Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:54:28.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on Laurentianus XXXII. 2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

P. G. Mason
P. G. Mason
Affiliation:
Aldenham School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The following note is based upon a re-examination of the binding, the quire signatures, and the enumeration of the plays of Euripides in L first made at Florence in 1948 and checked in 1952. Its purpose is (1) to suggest that conjectures are still current about L and the exemplar from which it was copied, which cannot be regarded as sufficiently supported by good evidence to justify their retention; and (2) to attempt some further clarification of L's relationship with the MS. Palatinus 287.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 4 , Issue 1-2 , May 1954 , pp. 56 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 58 note 1 For recent views on this problem in general v. Maas, Textkritik, p. 27, and Pasquali, Storia della Tradizione e Critica del Testo 2, 36 n. I

page 59 note 1 This is especially clear on 157, where the late hand writes in the number of the play, the personae, and the title Hippolytus, L him self having Phaedra as the title of the play. Cf. also metrical comments on 182 with the play number on 184.

page 59 note 2 For this problem in general v. Pasquali, Storia della Tradizione e Critica del Testo 2, 26 ff.