^{page 166 note 1} For general accounts see Hauréau, , Hist, de la Philos. Scolastigue, i., 1872, pp. 199–206Google Scholar; Huemer, , Wiener Sitzungsberichte, 96, 1880, pp. 505–551Google Scholar; Manitius, , Gesch. lat. Lit. des Mittelalters, i., 1911, pp. 504–519Google Scholar.

^{page 166 note 2} Cf. Manitius, , Münchener Museum für Philol. des Mittelalters, 2, 1913, pp. 79–98Google Scholar.

^{page 166 note 3} Manitius, ibid., pp. 101–108.

^{page 166 note 4} Manitius, ibid., pp. 98–101.

^{page 166 note 5} Manitius, ibid., pp. 109–113.

^{page 166 note 6} Esposito, , Didaskaleion; Studi filologici di letteratura cristiana antica, iii., 1914, pp. 173–181Google Scholar.

^{page 166 note 7} Phocas is thought to have lived in the second half of the fifth century, cf. Teuffel, , Gesch. rom. Lit., 6^e Aufl., iii., 1913, § 472Google Scholar , 4.

^{page 166 note 8} Cf. Manitius, , Neues Archiv der Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichtskunde, 32, pp. 681–683Google Scholar.

^{page 166 note 9} Neues Archiv, 36, 1910, pp. 47–48; Gesch. lat.Lit., i., 1911, p. 510; Didaskaleion, ii., 1913, pp. 73–88.

^{page 166 note 10} Of Theyer's valuable collection of about 800 MSS. some 312 are now in the British Museum (cf. Diet. Nat. Biog., art. Theyer, John). Theyer lived from 1597 to 1673.

^{page 166 note ll} According to Mr. J. P. Gilson, who has kindly furnished me with some particulars about the MS., these fragments are from an antiphonal.

^{page 167 note 1} This MS. is not referred to in Lindsay's edition of the Elymologiae (2 vols., Oxford, 1911)Google Scholar.

^{page 167 note 2} I.e. that portion on pp. 410–436, line 25, of Keil's edition (Grammatici Latini, v., 1868, pp. 410–439)Google Scholar, only the last two and a half pages not being commented on.

^{page 167 note 3} In the extracts above I print the words of Phocas in italics.

^{page 167 note 4} Phocas, p. 410, 2–3.

^{page 167 note 5} Cf. Isidori Etymol., i., 1, 2 (ed. Lindsay).

^{page 167 note 6} Isid., ibid., i., 5, 2, Alii dicunt a Graecis hoc tractum esse uocabulam [ars] άπò της άρεϒης, id est a virtute.

^{page 167 note 7} Isid., ibid., i., 39, 14.

^{page 167 note 8} tuo cod.

^{page 167 note 9} as cod.

^{page 167 note 10} gramaticos cod.

^{page 167 note 11} Ed., p. 410, 4–5.

^{page 167 note 12} Ed., p. 410, 6–7.

^{page 168 note 1} Ed., p. 410, 8–9. For uehis Keil reads uehens. The reading uehis is given by the Munich and Wolfenbüttel MSS. collated by Keil, and our text agrees with these MSS. in several other readings.

^{page 168 note 2} Ed., p. 436,1. 18.

^{page 168 note 3} Ibid., 19.

^{page 168 note 4} infiniti Keil.

^{page 168 note 5} praesens tempus K.

^{page 168 note 6} in re K.

^{page 168 note 7} Ibid., 19–20.

^{page 168 note 8} Ibid., 20–21.

^{page 168 note 9} infiniti K.

^{page 168 note 10} gerundi K.

^{page 168 note ll} messem feci K.

^{page 168 note 12} potest K.; ibid., 21–23.

^{page 168 note 13} Hec om. K.

^{page 168 note 14} sisto om. cod.

^{page 168 note 15} Ibid., 23–24.

^{page 168 note 16} tamen K.

^{page 168 note 17} Ibid., 24–25.

^{page 168 note 18} Teuffel, Gesch., iii.8, § 472, 4.

^{page 168 note 19} Manitius, , Gesch., i., pp. 46Google Scholar, 167, 279, 281, 460, 464, 492, 509.

^{page 168 note 20} Manitius, ibid., p. 509.

^{page 168 note 21} Keil (Gr. hat., v., pp. 406–7) mentions two anonymous Commentaries on Phocas, Munich, 19454. PP. I45–236, s. xi., and Vatican, Regia. 1560, ff. 24–35, s. xi. The first seems identical with, and the second closely allied to, the work of Remigius described above.

^{page 168 note 22} Gesch., i., pp. 506–515.

^{page 168 note 23} The Commentary on the De Barbarismo in Gotha, Membr. ii., No. 126, ff. Ia–24a, s. xii./xiii. (Jacobs, , Beiträge zur ältern Litteratur, i., 1835, p. 228), is perhaps that of Remigius.Google Scholar

^{page 169 note 1} Other copies are possibly Bruges, 168, s. xii., and Brussels, 5665, s. xii.

^{page 169 note 2} This MS. bears the superscription Expositio Martiani a Iohanne Scotto cepta, but the Commentary is that of Remigius.

^{page 169 note 3} This MS. is similarly inscribed Expositio Martiani a Iohanne Scotto excerpta, and Manitiushas wrongly given it as a copy of the work of Johannes, (Gesch., i., p. 337)Google Scholar.

^{page 169 note 4} This MS. has been fully described by the present writer (Zeits. für celtische Philologk, ix., 3, pp. 159–163, and Didashaleion, iii., 1914, pp. 173–181).