^{page 265 note 1} Classical Quarterly, October, 1912, pp. 246–268.Google Scholar

^{page 265 note 2} loc. cit., p. 252.

^{page 266 note 1} Italics mine.

^{page 266 note 2} 412c:

^{page 266 note 3} Quoted by Adam on 427E.

^{page 266 note 4} 427E.

^{page 266 note 5} Vide Adam′s note on 375c, 19, where re-ferences are given.

^{page 267 note 1} Thuc. ii. 40:

^{page 268 note 1} Contrast, however, 410C: (i.e., Music and Gymnastic) with 521E:

^{page 269 note 1} 404E, 410A, 410E:

^{page 269 note 2} He is helped by the common definition of

^{page 270 note 1} Loc. cit., p. 259.

^{page 271 note 1} 504B. Here, as in 435D, the object of the is to distinguish the ‘ parts ’ of Soul. Adam is wrong in taking αvτà. in 504B to refer to the Cardinal Virtues; according to a common Greek idiom the emphasis of the sen-tence beginning in 504A falls on the participial clause, . When this is seen it will readily follow that αvτà. below refers to εíδη Moreover, in the participial clause itself the emphatic word is not but αvτà. Socrates′ concern is not whether the ‘ parts ’ of soul are three in number or not, ls but whether he is right in distinguishing ‘ parts ’ at all.