¹ Euxitheos also mentions agricultural labour as typical of the δουλικ κα ταπειν πργματα into which citizen women had been forced by Athens' circumstances (57.45); since he adds that many have since gone from poverty to wealth, he seems to be suggesting that work of this sort was often temporary.

² This is the idealized division presented in Xenophon'sOeconomicus 7.17–43, especially 22.

³ Antiphanes fr. 157 (all comic fragments are cited from Kassel–Austin unless otherwise noted); cf. Hunter on the Ττθαι or Ττθη of Eubulus.

⁴ The following tombstones commemorate nurses (* denotes the description χρηστ, # denotes ϕλη; in those marked +, ττθη indicates both name and function: see L. Robert in Firatli, N. & Robert, L., Les Stèles Funéraires de Byzance Gréco-Romaine [Paris, 1964], 186)Google Scholar: IG II² 10843, 11647*, 12177⁺, 12242*, 12387*, 12559*, 12632*, 12812–4⁺ 12815–6+*, 12996, 13065; SEG XXI 1064*, XXVI 341*. On IG II² 7873 (below) and 9112 (below, n. 22), see Clairmont, C. W., Gravestone and Epigram (Mainz, 1970), nos. 25 and 18 respectively.Google Scholar

⁵ In Soph. Trach, Eur. Medea, Hipp., Andr. and, apparently, Stheneboea (Webster, T. B. L., The Tragedies of Euripides [London, 1967], 80–4)Google Scholar, they are confidants of principal female characters (and it is striking how much better informed the Nurse is than the Paidagogos in the prologue of the Medea), but the relationship of Odysseus and Eurycleia in Odyssey 19–23 (n.b. Rutherford [Cambridge, 1992] on 19.357) and the fact that most of the presumed donors depicted on the relevant gravestones are male imply that this is due to dramatic economy rather than simply reflecting reality.

⁶ Foxhall, L., CQ n.s. 39 (1989), 22–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Harris, E. M., Phoenix 46 (1992), 309–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷ Gould, J., JHS 100 (1980), 38–59 esp. 48–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Just, R., Women in Athenian Law and Life (London, 1989), ch. 6, esp. 106–8, 113Google Scholar. Interestingly, revisionist scholars trying to debunk the standard picture of female seclusion have made little or nothing of female labour as an argument: e.g. Gomme, A. W., CP 20 (1925), 1–25Google Scholar, Kitto, H. D. F., The Greeks (Harmondsworth, 1951), 219–36Google Scholar, Richter, C. D., CJ 67 (1971/1972), 1–8Google Scholar (who takes Euxitheos' words at face value on p. 8).

⁸ Cohen, D., Law, Sexuality and Society (Cambridge, 1991), ch. 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar, developing his arguments in G&R 36 (1989), 3–15Google Scholar. Gould had already suggested that it might be a question of ‘submerged lines of demarcation’, even among the poor (op. cit. [n. 7], 48–9).

⁹ The standard discussion of women at work in ancient Greece is still Herfst, P., Le travail de la femme dans la Grèce ancienne (Utrecht, 1922Google Scholar; repr. Salem, New Hampshire, 1980), which covers a wide geographical and chronological area: officially, his field is the Greek world to the 1st century a.d. (11), but he regularly cites later authors such as Clement of Alexandria and Eusebius and even the 12th-century Theodorus Prodromus (43n.10). Some of the relevant material from curse tablets is now made more accessible in Gager, J. (ed.), Curse Tablets and Binding Spells from the Ancient World (Oxford, 1992), ch. 4.Google Scholar

¹⁰ SEG 18.36 B212, 25.178.5; n.b. Athen. 415ab on Aglais the trumpeter. For women following artistic and intellectual careers in general, see Pomeroy, S., AJAH 2 (1977), 51–68.Google Scholar

¹¹ Pl. Alc. 126e, Lys. 208d, Laws 805e, Xen. Mem. 3.9.11, Lac.Pol. 1.3.

¹² Wool-workers: Tod, M. N., Epigraphica 12 (1950), 10–11Google Scholar; Jameson, M., CJ 73 (1977/1978), 134 n. 63Google Scholar; n.b. also the great frequency of scenes of wool-working on Attic vases: Webster, T. B. L., Potter and Patron in Classical Athens (London, 1972), chs. 16–17Google Scholar; dyeing: Ar. Eccl. 215 (amateur), Eup. fr. 434 (professional); carpet-weaver: SEG 18.36 B62; linen-working: Aeschin. 1.97, Alexis fr. 36; sewing of garments: IG II² 1556.28, Ziebarth, E., SBAW 33 (1934), n. 7.8Google Scholar ( = Jordan, D. R., GRBS 26 (1985), n. 72)Google Scholar and Antiphanes' play Aκεστρα (frr. 21–4); n.b. also the net-weaver, below 342; sale: Elephantis the cloak-seller IG II² 11254, Apollod. Car. fr. 30 (a play sub-titled ‘The Cloak-seller’); Thettale: IG II² 1672.70–1. In the same inscription, one Artemis of Piraeus sells 70 dr. worth of reeds (line 64); these were probably roofing material.

¹³ Pl. Rep. 455c cf. Thuc. 2.78.3; Herfst, op. cit. (n. 9), 24–32.

¹⁴ Men. fr. 451.12, Alexand. Com. fr. 3, Antiph. fr. 224; their services were particularly associated with weddings: Poll. 3.41.

¹⁵ Bread-sellers: Ar. Frogs 857–8, Lys. 458 and n.b. Hermipp. frr. 7–12 (Αρτοπώλιδες); Philocleon in Byzantium: Ar. Wasps 238; the summons: ibid. 1388–1414; cf. fr. 129 for a similar victim in another play. Their association in comedy with loud voices and abuse might be simply popular prejudice, but a low status elsewhere is suggested in the linking of bread-sellers with prostitutes by Anacreon, PMG 388.4–5. Bread-sellers at Athens were not exclusively female: see Rhodes on [Arist.] Ath.Pol. 51.3.

¹⁶ κοδομ, κοδομετρια: Poll. 1.246, 6.64, 7.181. Other domestic activities seem to be viewed in the same ideological light: like milling, water-carrying is represented as an activity which women did for themselves in the Golden Age before slavery (Herod. 6.137.3 cf. Pherec. fr. 10; P. Vidal-Naquet, in Vernant, J.-P. and Vidal-Naquet, P. (edd.), Travail et Esclavage en Grèce ancienne [Paris, 1988], 104–6)Google Scholar; hence some passages in drama imply that it is unusual for a respectable contemporary woman to fetch water, or acceptable only in a crisis (Eur. El. 107–9, 309; Men. Dys. 189–94; water-carrying in ritual contexts might have been felt to hark back to the Golden Age, though n.b. D. Williams, in Cameron, A. and Kuhrt, A. [edd.], Images of Women in Antiquity [London, 1983], 102–5Google Scholar for complexities here), yet other evidence implies that many free women did still fetch water (Ar. Lys. 327–35, Eur. Hipp. 123–4; Webster, op. cit. [n. 12], 98–9).

¹⁷ Porridge (λκιθος): Ar. Lys. 457, 562, Wealth 427–8; this last passage again links the trade to abusive language.

¹⁸ Meal and seed: Ar. Lys. 457, Poll. 6.37, IG II² 1554.40, D.L. 7.168; in the last case, the woman involved was presumably of free status, since Cleanthes cited her as a witness before the Areopagus; pulse: IG II² 1558.67.

¹⁹ Ach. 478, Thesm. 387, 456, Frogs 840; more precisely, she was a herb-seller, a female equivalent of the σκανδικοπώλης of Fr.Adesp.Vet. 97A (Edm.).: see Ruck, C., Arion n.s. 2 (1975), 14–16Google Scholar. Might the slur perhaps have been due either to origins in a deme represented as economically backward (though Phlya is not especially remote), or to the family's practising market-gardening rather than growing cereals?

²⁰ Vegetables: Wasps 497–9, Lys. 457, Poll. 7.199; garlic: Ar. Lys. 458; figs: ibid. 564, Poll. 7.198; sesame: IG II² 1561.27 – apparently working with her husband: ibid. 23; salt: IG II² 12073; honey: IG II² 1570.73, Poll. 7.198.

²¹ Washerwoman: IG I² 473 ( = Raubitschek, A. E., Dedications from the Athenian Akropolis [Cambridge, MA, 1949], no. 380)Google Scholar; fullers: IG II² 2934 n.b. Poll. 7.37.

²² There was also a vogue for Spartan nurses at Athens (Plut. Lyc. 16, Alc. 1); IG II² 9112, the tomb of Malicha of Cythera, might indicate that nursing was sufficiently lucrative to encourage migration to Athens, but Plut. Lyc. 16 makes it clear that some Spartan nurses at least were slaves. The involvement of nurses in the household in which they worked is implied by the titles of several 4th-century comedies: there were plays called Ττθη) by Alexis and Menander and Ττθαι or Ττθη by Eubulus.

²³ Hagnodike: Hyg. Fab. 274; Phanostrate: IG II² 6873 (n.b. the masculine form of ἰατρς: Robert, op. cit [n. 4], 175–8 discusses the terms used to denote women practising medicine); on both see Pomeroy, op. cit. (n. 10), 58–60, but n.b. the sceptical treatment of King, H. (PCPS 32 [1986], 53–77)Google Scholar, who regards the story of Hagnodike as a kind of myth. Alexis is reported to have used the word ἰτριαν (fr. 319), but this might simply have been a humorous coinage: Geoffrey Arnott has kindly drawn my attention to fr. 214, where Alexis uses περιστερς ‘in order to stress humorously by means of the masculine ending the sex of a speaker whose identification of himself with Aphrodite's pet bird is itself an amusing conceit’ (I quote by permission from his forthcoming commentary).

²⁴ E.g. Eur. Hipp. 293–4, Ar. Eccl. 528–50, and see in general Lloyd, G. E. R., Science, Folklore and Ideology (Cambridge, 1983), 63, 70–80Google Scholar and Herfst, op. cit. (n. 9), 55–6 for female healers. One might also note the popular association between women and ϕρμακα: Just, op. cit. (n. 7), 265–8.

²⁵ [Arist.] Ath.Pol. 14.4, Athen. 609c. The point seems to be that Hippias in marrying her took a wife of low status, hence, presumably, the alternative version in Ath. Pol. which makes her a Thracian (n.b. Rhodes ad loc). Other testimony on garland-sellers: Eubulus' play ‘Garlandsellers’ (frr. 97–104), Poll. 7.199.

²⁶ Dem. 57.31, 35; note that Euxitheos uses the 1st person plural, suggesting that he works together with his mother, and the present tense, implying that they are still practising the trade.

²⁷ Pherecr. fr. 70 with Athen. 612ab, 687a, citing an alleged law of Solon, is refuted by, for example, IG II² 1558.37. Sale of perfume: Ar. Eccl. 841, IG II² 1576.17, SEG 25.180.34; manufacture: Θρᾷττα μυρεϕς (IG II² 11688) – presumably a skilled slave.

²⁸ Fr. 70; since the passage is speaking of trade, this seems a more likely sense for μγειρος than ‘cook’.

²⁹ The classic text is Isaeus 10.10 with Wyse, the implications of which are discussed by Kuenen-Janssen, L. J. T., Mnemosyne³ 9 (1941), 199–214.Google Scholar

³⁰ See Schaps, D. M., Economic Rights of Women in Ancient Greece (Edinburgh, 1979), 52–8, 61–3Google Scholar; de Ste. Croix, G. E. M., CR n.s. 20 (1970), 273–8Google Scholar; Foxhall and Harris (opp. citt. [n. 6]) discuss practical ways in which women could escape the formal limitations of their capacities.

³¹ πανδοκετριαι: Ar. Lys. 458, Frogs 114, 549–78; καπηλδες: Thesm. 347, Wealth 1120–2, Theopomp. Com. frr. 25–9, IG II² 1533.16, 1557.51; bad language: Ar. Wealth 426–36, cf. Wasps 38; dishonesty: Wealth 435–6, Pl. Laws 918d. Curses: R. Wünsch, Defixionum Tabellae Atticae (IG III.3), 30.10, 68a.5, 13, b.6, 87a.8 (compare the κπηλοι cursed in 30, 68, 70, 73, 75, 87), Gager (op. cit. [n. 9]), no. 74 and n. 47, Jordan, op. cit. (n. 12), no. 11. Prostitute(s?) and procuress: Wünch 68a; purpose of curses: Gager, op. cit., 151–3, C. A. Faraone, in C. A. Faraone and D. Obbink (edd.), Magika Hiera (Oxford, 1991), 11.

³² βαλανετρια Poll. 7.166; λεπτρια: cf. also Lys. fr. 88S = Poll. 7.17; note also the plays titled Bαλανεῖον by Amphis, Diphilus and Timocles. For the disreputable character of bathattendants see Anderson, C. A., TAPA 121 (1991), 151 and n. 10.Google Scholar

³³ Cobblers: IG II² 1578.5, Wünsch (op. cit. n. 31) 12.2; gilder: SIG³ 1177 (probably Hellenistic, but may well reflect earlier conditions); potter: Beazley, ARV ² 571.73, but Green, R., JHS 81 (1961), 73–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar argues that the scene depicts metal-workers; ARV ² 658.29, which shows a woman cresting a helmet, may furnish another woman associated with metalwork; groom (πσηκιστρι[α]: SEG XVIII 36 B91; Glaukothea: Dem. 18.129, 259, 19.199, 281 – the cult was that of Sabazius (see Wankel on 18.259); Euphrosune the net-weaver: Ziebarth, op. cit. (n. 12), no. 5.3–5 [= Jordan, op. cit. (n. 12), no. 52]; again, the tablet is 3rd century, but seems likely to reflect classical conditions.

³⁴ So for example Fitton Brown, A. D., LCM 9 (1984), 71–4Google Scholar, following Herfst (op. cit. [n. 9]), 13–17.

³⁵ Sallares, Notably R., The Ecology of the Ancient Greek World (London, 1990), esp. 55–7, 82–3Google Scholar; Gallant, T. W., Risk and Survival in Ancient Greece (Cambridge, 1991), esp. 30–3, 127–8Google Scholar; Jameson, op. cit. (n. 12), 122–45; Cooper, A. Burford, CJ 73 (1977/1978), 162–75Google Scholar; Osborne, R., Demos: The Discovery of Classical Attika (Cambridge, 1985), 142–6Google Scholar, and Classical Landscape with Figures (London, 1987), esp. ch. 2Google Scholar; de Ste. Croix, G. E. M., The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World (London, 1981), esp. Appx. II.Google Scholar

³⁶ 18%; Jameson, op. cit. (n.12), 133–5; in general, see Tod, op. cit. (n. 12).

³⁷ Dem. 57.45; for this general sense of ἔριθος n.b. Hes. WD 602–3, Poll. 1.221, 7.141 and cf. 1.222, 7.141 for τρυγτρια.

³⁸ Song of the winnowers: Ar. Clouds 1358, fr. 352, Phryn. Com. fr. 14, Nicophon fr. 8; ποστρια: Poll. 7.141, Archipp. fr. 44, Phryn. Com. frr. 39–45, Magnes fr. 5; θερστρια: Ar. fr. 829; ϕρυγανστρια: Ar. fr. 916, Poll. 7.142; καλαμτρις: Poll. 1.222, 7.142; μητρδες in 1.222 appears to be the result of scribal confusion. N.b. also Fitton Brown (op. cit. [n. 34]), 73 for vasepaintings of women picking apples; these were perhaps inspired by the erotic overtones of apples (Burnett, A. P., Three Archaic Poets (London, 1983), 267 and n. 102).Google Scholar

³⁹ Burford Cooper, op. cit. (n. 35), 168–72; Osborne, , Classical Landscape (n. 35), 45–6Google Scholar, reinforced by the theoretical and comparative studies of Gallant, op. cit. (n. 35), ch. 4, esp. 82–92, who concludes that 3 hectares was a minimum holding for a household and 4–6 the norm.

⁴⁰ Arist. Pol. 1252b12, 1323a5–6; contrast Ar. Eccl. 651, the Utopian ideal. There are other considerations: Gallant, op. cit. (n. 35), 33 notes the status aspects of slave ownership, which might override purely economic calculations, and also points out that, in a crisis, slaves might be sold (ibid. 127–8). Todd, S. (JHS 110 [1990], 167–9)CrossRefGoogle Scholar suggests that political and jury pay may have been a significant supplementary income, especially for farmers, who would look on it as a bonus on top of their annual crop; any juror ‘covered for’ by his womenfolk would obviously be getting a genuine bonus, but the apparent profit might affect the readiness of any potential juror to buy a compensating slave.

⁴¹ The point is made by, among others, C. Mossé, in Finley, M. (ed.), Problèmes de la terre en Grèce ancienne (Paris, 1973), 179–86Google Scholar; De Ste. Croix, op. cit. (n. 35), 33, 52–3, and ch. 4; Wood, E. M., Peasant, Citizen and Slave (London, 1988)Google Scholar, chs. 2–3; cf. PI. Rep. 565a, and especially Isocrates' identification of the poor with fanners and traders in Golden Age Athens (7.44).

⁴² Walcot, P., Greek Peasants Ancient and Modern (Manchester, 1970), 37, 40–2Google Scholar; Jameson, op. cit. (n. 12), 138 n. 79.

⁴³ See also Gallant, op. cit. (n. 35), 87–92 for long-term fluctuations in the labour available to his model oikos.

⁴⁴ Jameson, op. cit. (n. 12), 137; Herfst, op. cit. (n. 9), 13–17.

⁴⁵ E.g. Mossé, op. cit. (n. 41), esp. 184–5.

⁴⁶ The case for widespread labour by citizen women at an early date would in fact be strengthened if we could trust his citation of a law of Solon forbidding the slandering of any citizen, male or female, for working in the agora (Dem. 57.30), but its authenticity is doubted by Ruschenbusch, E., ΣΩΛΩΝΟΣ ΝΟΜΟΙ (Historia Einzelschriften 9, Wiesbaden, 1966), Fl 17Google Scholar. One is the more inclined to suggest that his offer to name other citizen nurses, if the jurors wish, is a bluff, since it lays on them the onus for a breach of the apparent convention that citizen women are not mentioned by name in court (Schaps, D., CQ 27 [1977], 323–31).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁷ Which should warn us against identifying anyone threatening legal retribution as a citizen (e.g. Theopomp. fr. 28, Ar. Wealth 418–21, 433–4).

⁴⁸ [Xen]. Ath.Pol. 1.10–12; Pl. Rep. 563b, cf. Dem. 9.3

⁴⁹ Visits: Dem. 55.23–4, Men. Sam. 35–41; loans: Ar. Eccl. 446–9, Thphr. Char. 10.13, Cropp on Eur. El. 191, Millett, P., Lending and Borrowing in Ancient Athens (Cambridge, 1991), 37–9, 144–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; mutual assistance: Lys. 1.14, Eur. El. 1129–30, Ar. Eccl. 528–50.

⁵⁰ loc. cit. (n. 8).

⁵¹ Demos (n. 35), 144–6.

⁵² See, for example, Xen. Oec. 7.20–3, [Ar.] Oec. 1.3.4; the picture of Heracles working wool, at Omphale's behest is the ultimate rôle-reversal. This outlook persists in contemporary Albania: ‘no self-respecting male would be seen dead doing “women's work” for fear of being the laughing stock of his mates’ (The Guardian, 8th July, 1993).Google Scholar

⁵³ Women's market: Thphr. Char. 2.9, 22.10, Poll. 10.18. γλγη: Eup. fr. 327, Poll. 3.127, Cratin. fr. 51, Hermipp. fr. 11 with Hesychius s.v. γελγπωλις, against Pollux 7.198, who seems, since the context concerns terms for sellers of foods, to take γελγπωλις to mean ‘garlic-seller’, from γλγις (as do LSJ s.v.).

⁵⁴ De Ste. Croix, op. cit. (n. 35), 179–88; it is hard to know how much to make of Xenophon's preference for work over idleness even in high status women (Mem. 2.7.7, Oec. 10.10–13).

⁵⁵ So Walker, S., ‘Women and housing in classical Greece: the archaeological evidence’, in Cameron, A. and Kuhrt, A. (edd.), Images of Women in Antiquity (London, 1983), 81Google Scholar; n.b., however, M. Jameson, in Murray, O. and Price, S. (edd.), The Greek City from Homer to Alexander (Oxford, 1990), 186–92.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ See, for example, Xen. Oec. 10.2, Ar. Eccl. 878 with Ussher; Lys. 530–1, Thesm. 823. On the parasol as a status-symbol in its own right see Miller, M. C., JHS 112 (1992), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar