^{page 141 note 1} W. Schulze's observation (Quaestiones Epicae, p. 254, note 4) that ϕειδὠ : ὰϕειδής is a case of ē|ō ablaut is one of the rare admissions that an adjective ending in -ής can be anything but an s-stem. Another is Wackernagel's analysis of ὰγκυλο-χἠλης. I return later to these views and to those of Bechtel (on δνσαής).

^{page 141 note 2} The second α is probably short, although ἀαγ聑ς stands at the end of a hexameter in λ 575, and W. Schulze (Quaest. Epicae, 436) thinks that ἀ脓γής might be defended. The line ∪∪∪ (on such lines see Schulze 1. c. ), Sophocles, who has κνμαο脓γής, Oed. Col. 1243, did not know that.

^{page 142 note 1} The connexion of 礶καρής with κε聕ρω was perceived by the ancients (see Solmsen, Beiträge zur griech. Wortforschung, p. 162 footnote).

^{page 142 note 2} Tραϕ脴ναι is first fouind in Tragedy. Homer has only ἐτραφον, which he uses in a passive sense, v. Solmsen, Glottaa II. 311 (after Ph. Buttmann). With this fact the Homeric preference for -τρεφ聓ς (礶νεμο-τρεφ聓ς and many others) may be connected.

^{page 144 note 1} Herodian, περ联 ὀρθογραφίας, II. p. 473 (Lentz), quotes ὐπηλιφής andἀνυπηλιΦής Eustathius, Od. 1561, says: ἀνηλιφὴσ ναῦς ἡ μὴ ἀλιφεῖσα πίσσῃ, καὶ πισσαλιφὴς, ἡ πεπισσωμένη.

^{page 147 note 1} The ā-stems ending in -νίκης (-νίκας) are quite distinct. On their history see Fraenkel, E., Nomina Agentis, II. 98Google Scholar.