^{page 192 note 1} These verbs have been investigated by Hofmann, J. B. in a Greifswald dissertation (1910), De verbis quae in prisca Latinitate exstant deponentibusGoogle Scholar; cf. also Lindsay, , Lat. Lang. 522Google Scholar; Class. Quart. VII. 9.

^{page 192 note 2} There are of course a number of references to early anthors even in Philoxenus as now preserved; and in Cyrillus several quotations, e.g. from Terence, have been preserved, pointing to Festus as the source, though these are not in the Paris MS. of Philoxenus.

^{page 192 note 3} This view is accepted by Professor Lindsay, W. M., Textual Emendation, p. 16Google Scholar.

^{page 192 note 4} Journ. Theol. Stud. XVII., pp. 389 sq.; ibid. XXII., p. 380.

^{page 193 note 1} On Bible glossaries compiled from the ninth century onwards, and on late medieval dictionaries; cf.Goetz, , C.G.L. I. 217Google Scholar sqq., 236 sqq.

^{page 193 note 2} Class. Rev. XXXI. 188.

^{page 193 note 3} For the form of the second gloss we may compare AT 8 (Atharna:ϰθύος εῖδος) and AQ 3 (Aquipenser:εῖδος ϰθύος), the latter being a Festus gloss (cf. Paul. 20,26). What the correct form of the second lemma word was it is difficult to surmise.

^{page 193 note 4} The pertinent passage in Britonus, quoted in Du Cange (s.v. celtis), is: ‘Celtis: instrumentum ferreum aptum ad scalpendum, cisel Gallice, dicitur a celando, sed nusquam est in Biblia, unde Iob 19 ubi quidam legunt,’ etc.

^{page 194 note 1} The dictionaries actually give εποδοστράβη and ποδόστροΦον in this literal sence, i.e. a footsnare or an instrument of tortuse.

^{page 195 note 1} The entry in the Glossae Nominum (S.: quialium sermonibus errare facit) is merely an attempt to reproduce the Greek ρϒόμωκος in Latin; for Gloss. Nom. is largely (or wholly) compiled from Philoxenus material.

^{page 195 note 2} This question will be discussed more fully in the introduction to the edition of Philoxenus.