Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:39:11.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Evil Communications’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

H. J. Rose
Affiliation:
University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.

Extract

Mr. P. H. Ling's suggestion that the famous line ϕθε⋯ρουσιν ἤθη χρ⋯σθ' ⋯μιλ⋯αι κακα⋯ stood at the beginning of a play of Euripides seems to me to lack anything like cogent proof. A gnomic verse of this sort—to take the characteristics of the line in the order given by Mr. Ling—may indeed begin a play, as in the fragment of the Stheneboia (Nauck, 661) which he quotes; but it may also begin a speech, as Hec. 864; or come early in a speech, cf. Heracl. 2; or alone in stichomythia, as Alc. 540; or late in a speech, as Med. 561; or at the end of one, as Supp. 510. In other words, there is no position which it may not have. As to its lack of ‘any particle or conjunction to connect it with what preceded or followed,’ how does Mr. Ling prove that it was not preceded by γιγνώσκων ὅτι, cf. Med. 560; or that the previous line did not end in γάρ, like Hec. 551, Supp. 361; or that this line is not the end of a longer sentence, like Alc.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1925

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 92 note 1 C.Q. XIX., pp. 22 sqq.

page 92 note 2 See Norden, Agnostos Theos, for a full discussion.

page 92 note 3 See Moffatt, , Literature of the N.T., p. 89Google Scholar.

page 93 note 1 Cf. J. Th. Stud. XXV., p. 43.

page 93 note 2 Cf. Moulton-Howard, , Grammar of N.T. Greek, II., p. 63Google Scholar, where a wrong conclusion is drawn from correct facts.