No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
In the April No., 1935, p. 66,1 asserted that Bechtel's proposal to read Kυλαιθίδος at Theocr. 5. 15 was prompted by Hdas 6. 55, which is now read otherwise. This is a mistake; it comes from 6. 50, where the papyrus is quite legible.
- Type
- Corrigendum
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1935
You have
Access