Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:52:02.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Caeli Convexa Per Auras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

W. F. J. Knight
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Dr. Cyril Bailey and Dr. C. M. Bowra have most recently analysed Virgil's method of using the expressions of Lucretius and Ennius respectively, and Mile A.-M. Guillemin has lately added significant considerations to Father F.-X. M. J. Roiron's long examination of Virgil's method of using again his own former expressions. Since then other work has been done with the purpose of clarifying the less rational part of Virgil's self-repetition; it might be called complementary to the well-known researches of Mr. John Sparrow. With such a purpose I have tried to suggest how Virgil reached the strange phrase in the first Eclogue, rapidum Cretae, or cretae, Oaxen, by a not unparalleled confusion of the names of several different rivers and at least one town.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 34 , Issue 3-4 , October 1940 , pp. 129 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bailey, Cyril, The Proceedings of the Classical Association, xxxii, 1935, 1–49.Google Scholar

2 Bowra, C. M., C.Q. xxiii, 1929, 65–75.Google Scholar

3 Guillemin, A.-M., L'Originalité de Virgile, Paris, 1930.Google Scholar

4 Roiron, F.-X. M. J., S.J., Étude sur l'imagination auditive de Virgile, Paris, 1908.Google Scholar

5 Sparrow, John, Half-lines and Repetitions in Virgil, Oxford, 1930.Google Scholar

6 Knight, W. F. J., C.R. li, 1937, 212–13.Google Scholar

7 Virg. Ecl. i. 65.Google Scholar

8 Friedrich, W.-H., Untersuchungen zu Senecas dramatischer Technik, Borna-Leipzig, 1933.Google Scholar

9 Virg. Aen. ix. 485.Google Scholar

10 Virg. Aen. iv. 205.Google Scholar

11 Ciris, 61 = Virg. Ecl. vi. 77.Google Scholar

12 Virg. Aen. vi. 80.Google Scholar

13 Virg. Georg. ii. 407.Google Scholar

14 Virg. Aen. ii. 169.Google Scholar

15 Virg. Georg. i. 200.Google Scholar

16 Virg. Georg. ii. 77.Google Scholar

17 Virg. Georg. iv. 309.Google Scholar

18 Virg. Aen. vi. 738.Google Scholar

19 Virg. Georg., i. 135.Google Scholar

20 Virg. Georg. ii. 151–2.Google Scholar

21 Virg. Aen. vi. 6–7.Google Scholar

22 Virg. Aen. vii. 287.Google Scholar

1 Virg. Aen. vii. 543.Google Scholar

2 Virg. Aen. vi. 300.Google Scholar

3 Virg. Aen. xii. 407–8.Google Scholar

4 Virg. Aen. ix. 676.Google Scholar

5 Virg. Aen. ii. 238.Google Scholar

6 Virg. Aen. viii. 153.Google Scholar

7 Virg. Aen. iv. 363–4.Google Scholar

8 Virg. Aen. iv. 6–7.Google Scholar

9 Virg. Aen. iv. 607.Google Scholar

10 Virg. Aen. iii. 111.Google Scholar

11 Virg. Aen. xi. 557.Google Scholar

12 Virg. Ecl. iv. 38.Google Scholar