No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Aristophanes, Lysistrate 256–65 ∼ 271–80 runs as follows. I print the muchdiscussed and frequently emended2 lines 260–65 ∼ 275–80 as they appear in the manuscripts (the strophe survives only in R) and testimonia, and shall argue that they are sound with the exception of 264, for which I suggest an emendation.
page 53 I shall refer to the following works by the author's name only: editions of Lysistrate: Brunck, R. (Argentorati, 1783)Google Scholar; V. Coulon (Paris, 1928); R. Enger (Bonn, 1844); F. W. Hall and W. M. Geldart2 (Oxford, 1907); H. Holden (Cambridge, 1868); A. Meineke (Leipzig, I860); B. B. Rogers (London, 1911); J. van Leeuwen (Leiden, 1903); U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff (Berlin, 1927); other works: Dale, A. M., The Lyric Metres of Greek Drama 2 (Cambridge, 1968)Google Scholar; Denniston, J. D., ‘Lyric Iambics In Greek Drama’’, in Greek Poetry and Life. Essays Presented to Gilbert Murray (Oxford, 1936), pp.121 ff.Google Scholar; Fraenkel, E., ‘Lyrische Daktylen’’, in Kleine Beiträge zur klassischen Pbilologie i (Rome, 1964), pp.165 ff.Google Scholar (= RbM 72 (1918), 161 ff., 321 ff.); Henderson, J., ‘Coniecturarum in Aristophanis Lysistratam Repertorium’’, HSCPh 82 (1978)Google Scholar; Hermann, G., Euripidis Iphigeneia Taurica (Leipzig 1833)Google Scholar; Platnauer, M., ‘Antistrophic Variation In Aristophanes’’, in Greek Poetry and Life (as above), pp.241 ff.Google Scholar; Prato, C., I canti di Aristofane (Rome, 1962)Google Scholar; Schroeder, O., Aristophanis Cantica 2 (Leipzig, 1930)Google Scholar; Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von, Griechische Verskunst (Berlin, 1921).Google Scholar
page 53 note 1 See Platnauer, , pp.243 f.Google Scholar
page 53 note 2 For a full listing of proposed emendations, see Henderson, , ad loc.Google Scholar
page 54 note 1 For resolution of the first syllable in 265 cf. Frogs 395 f. and see Prato, , p.187 (at Birds 944).Google Scholar
page 54 note 2 For possible parallels see Denniston, , pp.139 ff.Google Scholar
page 54 note 3 Dale, , p.78 n.l.Google Scholar
page 54 note 4 Brunck conjectured 
at Plutus 297 (
codd.).
page 54 note 5 Further examples in Denniston, , pp. 133 ff.Google Scholar Note that Birds 1394, cited by Denniston, (p.134)Google Scholar, is not an example: see Fraenkel, , p.185 n.l.Google Scholar
page 54 note 6 See Wilamowitz, , Verskunst, pp.269 ff. for possible licences in Euripides.Google Scholar
page 54 note 7 Cf. Verskunst, pp.481 f.
page 54 note 8 First suggested by Hermann, (at line 192) and Reisig (in Enger, ad loc).Google Scholar