Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T02:11:28.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Unnoticed Official: The Praepositus Saltus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

David Woods
Affiliation:
Belfast

Extract

The Passio Typasii survives in only one manuscript and was published for the first time in 1890. It purports to describe the trial and death of a Mauretanian martyr, a military veteran by the name of Typasius, during the Diocletianic persecution. However as recently demonstrated its literary borrowings, from the Breviarium of Eutropius and the Vita Martini of Sulpicius Severus, suggest that it is a mere fiction and that it should be dated after c. A.d. 396. It is the purpose of this note to draw attention to its preservation of an otherwise unattested title, that of the praepositus saltus, and to expand upon the significance of this title for the interpretation of the work. This title only occurs fully in one passage, being elsewhere abbreviated to praepositus, and this passage is of some interest therefore.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Smedt, C., ‘Passiones Tres Martyrum Africanorum’, Analecta Bollandiana 9 (1890), 107Google Scholar–34. In my references to this text I follow Smedt's chapter headings, but also refer to the sentences which his text does not number.

2 Woods, D., ‘A Historical Source of the Passio Typasii’, Vigiliae Christianae 47 (1993), 7884CrossRefGoogle Scholar, developing upon Stancliffe, C., St. Martin and His Hagiographer (Oxford, 1983), pp. 144–8Google Scholar, and Monceaux, P., ‘Etude critique sur le Passio Tipasii Veterani’, Revue Archéologique 4 (1904), 267–74Google Scholar. See also Fontaine, J., ‘Suplice Severe a-t-il travesti Saint Martin de Tours en martyr militaire?’, Analecta Bollandiana 81 (1963), 3158, pp. 43–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Barcellona, F. S., ‘Sogni e visioni nella letteratura martirologica africana posteriore al III secolo’, Augustinianum 29, 193212, pp. 208–10Google Scholar. It is the date of composition of the Vita Martini which provides the terminus post quem of c. A.d. 396 for the Passio Typasii. It should be pointed out now also that the Vita Martini spread across North Africa, from Carthage to Egyptian Thebes, within a remarkably short period, within a year of its production even, Sulpicius Severus, Dial. I.3, 23.

3 C. Smedt, art. cit., p. 119.

4 Helgeland, J., ‘Christians in the Roman Army, A.d. 173–337’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der romischen Welt II.23.1 (1979), 724834, p. 787.Google Scholar

5 PLRE I, p. 269, Doncius.

6 Passio Typasii 2.9: Et continuo eum praepositus cunei eius accepit atque in ferrea vincula conjecit.

7 J. Helgeland, art. cit., p. 787.

8 The pro-Roman nature of the text rules out the possibility that this praepositus and the decurion are ‘cases, perhaps, not of actual Roman officials, but of local dynasts who had assumed Roman military titles’, as described by Matthews, J., ‘Mauretania in Ammianus and the Notitia’, 157–88, p. 172, in Aspects of the Notitia Dignitatum (Oxford, 1976), edd. Goodburn, R. and Bartholomew, P..Google Scholar

9 Jones, A. H. M., The Later Roman Empire 284–602 (Oxford, 1964), pp. 412–14Google Scholar, for this and what follows.

10 Not. Dig. Oc. XII. 17–27.

11 Not. Dig. Oc. XII. 25: Procurator rei privatae per Mauritaniam Sitifensem.

12 A. H. M. Jones, op. cit., p. 413.

13 Peachin, M., ‘Praepositus or Procurator?’, Historia 36 (1987), 248–9.Google Scholar

14 Amm. 22.11.9; 14.9.7.

15 J. Helgeland, art. cit., p. 787, simply following C. Smedt, art. cit., p. 119.

16 C.Th. 12.1.33.

17 C.Th. 10.3.4.

18 A. H. M. Jones, op. cit., pp. 615–19, for what follows.

19 C.Th. 7.13.7 (A.d. 375).

20 C.Th. 7.13.2 (A.d. 370); an exception being C.Th. 7.13.12 (A.d. 397).

21 A. H. M. Jones, op. cit., p. 1252.

22 Ibid., p. 617.

23 Historia Monachorum In Aegypto VIII.10; Orosius, Hist. Adv. Paganos VII.33.

24 C.Th. 12.1.11 (A.d. 325), 13 (A.d. 326), 22 (A.d. 336), 37 (A.d. 344), 38 (A.d. 346), 45 (A.d 358), 56 (A.d. 362), 87 (A.d. 381), 88 (A.d. 382), 95 (A.d. 383), 113 (A.d 386), 137 (A.d. 393), 147 (A.d. 416).

25 Warmington, B. H., ‘The Career of Romanus, Comes Africae’, Byzantische Zeitschrift 49 (1956), 5564.Google Scholar

26 Frend, W. H. C., The Donatist Church (Oxford, 1952), pp. 51, 61, 199.Google Scholar

27 Gregoire, H., ‘Sainte Salsa, roman épigraphique’, Byzantion 12 (1937), 212–34.Google Scholar

28 Barnes, T. D., ‘An Anachronism in Claudian’, Historia 27 (1978), 498–9.Google Scholar

29 The temptation is all the greater since this date explains why the author used the Breviarium of Eutropius as his historical source rather than the Historia Adversus Paganos of Orosius which was only composed in A.d. 417. His failure to use the Chronicle of Jerome, which was composed at Constantinople c. A.d. 380, is not quite as surprising as would have been his failure to quote from the work of a fellow North African Christian.

30 Passio Typasii 1.3: Praeterea in Sitifensi provincia gentiles, qui semper pacati fuerant et Quinquegentiani vocantur, direptis provincialium facultatibus atque universis possessoribus incolisque prostratis, latrocinia perpetrabant.

31 Claudian, De Bello Gildonico 197200.Google Scholar

32 Passio Typasii 1.5: Tanta erat desperatio ut Africa Romanis necata videretur imperio.

33 Passio Typasii 1.4: Contra quos multi iudicesproduxerant, et universi cum magnis exercitibus victi perierant, in tantum ut terribili horrore nullus iam comes ad ipsas partes auderet accedere et, duces, qui ad Sitifensem provinciam mittebantur, aut aegritudinem fingerent, aut veluti naufragia formidantes, in vicinas Italiae insulas residerent.

34 Claudian, De Bello Gildonico 516–26.Google Scholar

35 T. D. Barnes, art. cit., p. 499.

36 Seeck, O., Regesten der Kaiser und Päpste für die Jahre 311 bis 476 n. Chr. (1919), p. 292.Google Scholar