Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T03:26:10.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An emendation to the scholia on Homer's Nekuia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Edward Gutting
Affiliation:
Princeton University, [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Shorter Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I would like to thank Richard Martin and the anonymous referee for their helpful comments on this piece.

2 Dindorf, G., Scholia Graeca in Homeri Odysseam (Oxford, 1855), 511–12.Google Scholar All subsequent references to the scholia of the Odyssey are to this edition, which remains the most recent with the exception of Ludwich's, A.Scholia in Homeri Odysseas A 1–309 Auctoria et Emendatiora (Hildesheim, 1966)Google Scholar, which covers but a small portion of the whole.

3 Butttnann, P., Scholia Antiqua in Homeri Odysseam (Berlin, 1821).Google Scholar

4 See, for example, Heubeck's note on Odyssey 11.568–627 for an argument for the text's integrity based on structural similarities between it and the Nekuia's catalogue of women. Heubeck also lists modern attempts to attack the lines, e.g. Wilamowitz's contention that they are an Orphic interpolation in Homerische Untersuchungen (Berlin, 1884), 109206.Google Scholar

5 Erbse, H., Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem (Berlin, 1969).Google Scholar

6 The scholia's other criticisms of the Heracles scene follow shortly after 11.568, at lines 11.601,602,604,616.