No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
The revival of interest in Greek metre cannot be without an influence on the text of Pindar. In some ways this influence may have been for the good, but in one respect a theory based on insufficient evidence seems in danger of corrupting the text. The theory is briefly that in his dactylo-epitrite poems Pindar occasionally equated a choriamb — ∪ ∪ — with an epitrite — ∪— — or — — ∪ —. This theory has been stated explicitly by two leading Pindaric scholars, Otto Schröder and U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorf. In the Prolegomena to his Editio Maior, p. 13, Schröder briefly states his case for what he calls ‘metathesis metrica.’ Moved by the fact that in iambic and Ionic metres a short syllable may be substituted for a long, and vice versa, he is convinced that the same applies to the metres of Pindar.
page 174 note 1 Cf. also his Appendix published in 1922, p. 503.
page 175 note 1 Weil, H., Jahrbuch. class. Phil. 85, 1862, P. 347Google Scholar.
page 175 note 2 Hardie, W. R., Res Metrica, p. 86Google Scholar.
page 176 note 1 In V. 191τᾷδε, Wilamowitz. In V. 151 μινὺνθη), Jebb; μνυνθεν, Housman.
page 177 note 1 Not by the vigilant Maas, P. in his excellent Die Ntue Responsionsfreiheien I., p. 10Google Scholar.
page 179 note 1 Pindaros, p. 302.
page 179 note 2 In his Adversaria Critica I., p. 187.
page 182 note 1 Op. cit. I., p. 9.