Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:59:24.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Greek and Latin Papyri in Aberdeen Museum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Extract

I DO not think that it is at all generally known that among the Egyptian antiquities given by Grant Bey to the Museum at Aberdeen there are a considerable number of papyrus fragments, Greek, Coptic,1 Hieratic, Demotic, and even Latin and Arabic, which except for an inspection by Prof. Sayce and a passing visit of Dr. Grenfell have up till now been left unexamined. That indeed is my only reason for trespassing in a branch of Palaeography with which I am quite unfamiliar; and it is in the hope of inciting some experienced papyrologist to turn his attention to them that I publish the following fragments. In the case of the Greek fragments lack of time combined with a mistrust of my powers of deciphering the more illegible non-literary hands forbade me do more than select the most promising literary fragments. Among these Homer naturally predominates; but the gem of the collection is a lyric fragment, which may fairly certainly be ascribed to Alcaeus, though Dr. Grenfell who first noticed it attributed it to Sappho. A fragment of Demosthenes, a fragment of Dioscorides, and a vellum fragment of a Latin Bible, were the only others which I succeeded in identifying; but these, with the few tragic, comic, and medical fragments which I also reproduce, are, I think, first-fruits sufficient to show that the crop would not be barren, if it found a competent gleaner.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 257 note 1 The Coptic fragments I examined, and found that, with the exception of one Achmimie fragment already known to specialists, they are too small and ill preserved to be of any value.

page 261 note 1 M.Reinach is wrong in calling it ‘deux lambeaux’: it is really one, though almost severed into two.

page 262 note 1 Revue des Ittudes grecgues xviii. 81 (July 1905) 295, and a later article in the same Revue. It has since been reproduced by U.von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff in Berliner Klassiker Texte, Heft V, Theil II (1907) pp. 148–149. He recognises that it is connected with a fragment published by Schubart Site. Berl Akad. 1902, p. 195; and suggests for the last line of the Aberdeen fragment the reading Mύρσιλος ⋯λεσεν, which fits very well with the trace of letters visible on the photo. This fragment seems, judging from Schubart's photo, to fit on to the bottom of his fragment.