Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:21:46.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Saving the Appearances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

G. E. R. Lloyd
G. E. R. Lloyd
Affiliation:
King's College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘Saving the appearances’, , is a slogan that, in its time, stood or was made to stand for many different methodological positions in many different branches of ancient natural science. It is not my aim, in this paper, to attempt to tackle the subject as a whole. I shall concentrate on just one inquiry, astronomy. Nor, with astronomy, can I do justice to all the complexities of what was certainly one of the central methodological issues, if not the central issue, in the history of ancient theoretical astronomy. I have a quite limited aim, to examine the foundations, and test the applicability, of a widespread and influential line of interpretation of ancient Greek astronomy according to which it was essentially, or at least predominantly, what we may call ‘instrumentalist’ in character—that is, broadly speaking, that Greek astronomical theories were devices or fictions put forward purely for the sake of calculations with no claims to correspond with physical reality.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , May 1978 , pp. 202 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(Except where otherwise stated, ancient authors are cited according to the following editions: Philoponus, , De Opificio Mundi, ed. Reichardt, W., Leipzig, 1897;Google Scholar
Proclus, , Hypotyposis Astronomicarum Positionum, ed. Manitius, C., Leipzig, 1909;Google Scholar
In Platonis Rem Publicam Commentarii, ed. Kroll, W., Leipzig, 1899–1901;Google Scholar
In Platonis Timaeum Commentaria, ed. Diehl, E., Leipzig, 1903–1906;Google Scholar
Ptolemy, , Syntaxis Mathematica, ed. Heiberg, J. L., Leipzig 1898–1903;Google Scholar
Opera Astronomica Minora, ed. Heiberg, J. L., Leipzig, 1907;Google Scholar
Simplicius, , In Aristotelis De Caelo Commentaria, ed. Heiberg, J. L., Berlin, 1894;Google Scholar
In Aristotelis Pbysica Commentaria, ed. Diels, H., Berlin, 1882–1895;Google Scholar
Theon of Smyrna, , Expositio rerum mathematicarum, ed. Hiller, E., Leipzig, 1878).Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, E. J. (1961): The Mechanization of the World Picture (original Dutch 1950), Oxford.Google Scholar
Doland, E., AND Maschler, C. (1969): To Save the Phenomena (translation of Duhem, , 1908), Chicago.Google Scholar
Dreyer, J. L. E. (1906): History of the Planetary Systems from Thales to Kepler, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1908): ΣΩzein Ta ΦainomenaGoogle Scholar
Annates de philosophie chretienne, 6, pp. 113–39, 277–302, 352–77, 482–514, 561–92.Google Scholar
(1954): LeSystéme du monde, 2nd edn. (1st edn. 1913), Paris.Google Scholar
Goldstein, B. R. (1967): ‘The Arabic version of Ptolemy's Planetary Hypotheses’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 57, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grynaeus, S. (1540): Prodi Diadochi Hypotyposis Astronomicarum Positionum, Basel.Google Scholar
Halma, N. (1820): Hypothesès et époques des planètes de C. Ptolémee et Hypotyposes de Proclus Diadochus, ParisGoogle Scholar
Hesse, M. B. (1967): ‘Laws and theories’, Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edwards, P., New York, Vol. 4, pp.404–10.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1970): Early Greek Science, Thales to Aristotle, London.Google Scholar
Manitius, C. (1909): Proclus, Hypotyposis Astronomicarum Positionum, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mittelstrass, J. (1962): Die Rettung der Phä;nomene, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neugebauer, O. (1957): The Exact Sciences in Antiquity, 2nd edn., Providence, R.I.Google Scholar
(1959): ‘The equivalence of eccentric and epicyclic motion according to Apollonius’, Scripta Mathematica, 24, pp.5–21.Google Scholar
(1972): ‘On some aspects of early Greek astronomy’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 116, pp.243–51.Google Scholar
Nix, L. (1907): translation of book ii of Ptolemy, Planetary Hypotheses, in Ptolemy, Opera Astronomica Minora, ed. Heiberg, J. L., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Sambursky, S. (1962): The Physical World of Late Antiquity, London.Google Scholar
(1965): ‘Plato, Proclus, and the limitations of science’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 3, pp.1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserstein, A. (1962): ‘Greek scientific thought’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 188, N.S. 8, pp.51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L. (1973–1974): ‘The astronomy of Eudoxus: Geometry or Physics?’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 4, pp.165–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar