Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:45:01.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Phantom of the Sophist:τo oυκ oντως oυκ oν (240a–c)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2006

David B. Robinson
David B. Robinson
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , December 2001 , pp. 435 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper has been much improved in the light of comments or suggestions made by Lesley Brown, Allan Coxon, Paolo Crivelli and Michael Stokes, among others. I must express great gratitude to all my critics; I am as grateful for criticisms against which I have rebelled as for those which I have accepted; no blame must attach to these critics for the remaining errors or absurdities. I am greatly indebted, not for the first time, to Elaine Hutchison for skilful word-processing. Principal sources are listed at the and of the paper.

References

* This paper has been much improved in the light of comments or suggestions made by Lesley Brown, Allan Coxon, Paolo Crivelli and Michael Stokes, among others. I must express great gratitude to all my critics; I am as grateful for criticisms against which I have rebelled as for those which I have accepted; no blame must attach to these critics for the remaining errors or absurdities. I am greatly indebted, not for the first time, to Elaine Hutchison for skilful word-processing. Principal sources are listed at the and of the paper.