Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:28:02.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Periplus Maris Erythraei: The Indian Evidence as to The Date

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

J. A. B. Palmer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mr. M. P. Charlesworth seems to have been too sceptical when he remarked (Classical Quarterly, xxii, 1928, p. 93) that ‘the names of the Indian princelets given in the Periplus are unidentifiable, or rather too easily identifiable with any one, to be of any use’. Actually, the ruler mentioned in ch. 41 is identifiable beyond reasonable doubt, and (even more important) his date is practically certain.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 41 , Issue 3-4 , July 1947 , pp. 136 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 139 note 1 Konow, Sten (J.I.H. xii, 1933Google Scholar ) once argued that there were two Nahapānas—an earlier and a later. This view never won any acceptance: and it was based on a palaeographical argument which was refuted by Rapson, in A.O. xi, p. 260Google Scholar .