Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:13:19.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on the Oresteia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

George Thomson
Affiliation:
Galway

Extract

The openings of the strophe and antistrophe do not correspond, and many unavailing efforts have been made, from Triclinius to Lawson, to bring them into conformity. But, as I have shown elsewhere (Greek Lyric Metre, pp. 117–18), the discrepancy appears to be intentional and appropriate. For other instances of the same thing see 709–10, 715–16 (ibid. pp. 113–14), and there is yet another in Cho. 422–4 (resolved iambics for lamentation, loc. cit. p. 88) = 443–5 (dochmiac in anticipation of the climax). In 1005 πρ⋯παρ (MSS) is not only better attested than προιθ' (Triclinius), but it makes a much better rhythm:

τ⋯ δ' ⋯π⋯ γ⋯ν πεσ⋯ν ἄπαξ θαν⋯σιμον πρν⋯σιμον πρ⋯παρ ⋯νδρ⋯ς μ⋯λαν αἶμα τ⋯ς ἄν…

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 References to Wecklein's edition.