Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:13:19.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on The Corpus Tibullianum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Extract

Delia is being carefully watched and the door is locked to keep her in and her lover out (lines 5–6). It is hardly reasonable to suppose that she has in these circumstances been left in possession of the key; it is presumably in the custody of the ianitor. According to Ovid(A.A. iii. 643), what girls in this situation did was to have a duplicate key (adultera clauis) fabricated for use when occasion offered.

The Delphin Ed. note ‘Par. pro fixo habet fcdso’ may, of course, record what is merely a correction. Falso may, on the other hand, have arisen from a gloss on a reading ficto in a manuscript prior to those extant, which could easily have degenerated to fixo. This reading would sufficiently improve the sense of the passage to merit consideration, for lines 17 ff., while couched in general terms, clearly refer to the situation in which Tibullus and Delia are placed and describe the kind of behaviour by which they are to merit Venus' aid.

Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 As in Apuleius, , Met. ix. 20Google Scholar, where the situation is similar to that in the present passage.

2 Inst. Or. X. i. 93.

3 Compare, e.g., Virgil, , Ed. ix. 28Google Scholar, and Plautus, , Amph. II. ii. 94Google Scholar.