No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Ennead VI. 4. 1 (Volkmann's edition, p. 363, 1. 7): καὶ ὅμως ἐν μὲν ταῖς ποιότησι τὸ αὐτὸ μεμερισμένον θεωρεῖται, ἐπί δὲ ψνχῆς τὸ αὐτὸ οὐ μεμερισμένον κ.τ.λ. As there is no antithesis to justify ὅμως (praeterea, Ficinus) we should read ὅλως, which neatly sums up the argument: ‘in a word, while in qualities the same thing is seen as divided, in soul the same thing is not divided,’ etc.