Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:44:17.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on the use of the Praenomen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

J. G. F. Powell
J. G. F. Powell
Affiliation:
Merton College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is recognized that Romans of the late Republic did not normally address or refer to one another by praenomen alone (for the conventions, see J. N. Adams, ‘Conventions of naming in Cicero’, CQ n.s. 28 [1978], 145 ff.; J. P. V. D. Balsdon, Romans and Aliens, ch. 11; Fordyce on Catullus 68 init.). Most instances in which the praenomen is used alone are easily explicable (see Adams, p. 161); either the persons concerned are members of the same family, with names otherwise identical (‘Marce fili’, ‘Quinte frater’; ‘Luci’ in de Fin. 5. 71, cf. 15, etc.), or the praenomen itself is particularly distinctive and aristocratic (Appius Claudius or Servius Sulpicius).

Type
Shorter Notes
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , May 1984 , pp. 238 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)