^{page 105 note 1} See Delisle, L., Bill. Nationale, Catalogue des Manuscrits des Fonds Libri et Barrois (1888), p. 125Google Scholar; Omont, Inventaire Sommaire; Nigra, , lib. cit., XX. (1892), pp. 209–212Google Scholar; Ludwich, A., op. cit., p. 124Google Scholar; Allen, T. W., Vol. V. of Homeri Opera (Oxford Text), p. 190Google Scholar.

^{page 105 note 2} Formerly Ashburnham 1198, Libri 8070. For the Homeric Hymns it is Π for Proclus, P.

^{page 105 note 3} So Delisle, I.e.; Nigra, , l.c., p. 209Google Scholar, says cmm. 33, 7 x 23.

^{page 105 note 4} Cf. Q, F, At.

^{page 105 note 5} I cite it from Nigra, l.c. For an emended text, see Wilamowitz, p. 4. The poem recurs in a printed copy from Berne (see Hermes, XXVI., p. 308); and II. 1–4 in F, At, T, and (by addition) I. Politian (Misc. XXIV.) cites 1. 5. Nigra discusses the items named (l.c., pp. 210–211).

^{page 106 note 1} Praef., p. 11.

^{page 106 note 2} See Bandini, A. M., Catalogus codicum MSS. bibliothecae Mediceo-Laurentianae (Florence, 1763–1770), II., pp. 204–5Google Scholar; Ludwich, A., op. cit., p. 123Google Scholar; Allen-Sikes, , Homeric Hymns, p. XGoogle Scholar. For Proclus it is E; for Homeric Hymns, L^l. Mr. Allen say it has ff. 170, and assigns ff. 144–170 to Homeric Hymns.

^{page 107 note 1} See Piccolomini, E., Intorno alle condizioni ed alle vicende della libreria Medicea privata, in Archivio Storico Italiano, Third Series, XIX. (1874), pp. 100–129, 254–281Google Scholar; XX. (1874), pp. 51 sqq.; XXI. (1875), pp. 102 sqq., 282 sqq.; 538 sq.

^{page 107 note 2} Praef., p. II.

^{page 107 note 3} In Encycl. Brit., art. ‘Savonarola.’

^{page 107 note 4} See Nigra, , lib. cit., XX. (1892). pp. 414Google Scholar sqq.

^{page 107 note 5} Angeli Politiani Miscellaneorum Centuriae Primae ad Laurentium Midicem.

^{page 107 note 6} See Proctor, R., The Printing of Greek in the Fifteenth Century (Oxford, 1910), p. 133Google Scholar.

^{page 108 note 1} Opera Omnia Angeli Politiani, et alia quaedam lectu digna, quorum nomina ex sequenti indice videre licet.

^{page 108 note 2} See Maittaire, M., Annales Typographici (Amsterdam, 1733), I. 101–7, 759Google Scholar; Fabricius, J. A., Bibliotheca Graeca (fourth edition, Hamburg), p. 825Google Scholar; Hain, L., Repertorium BibUographicum (Stuttgart, 1827)Google Scholar, I., Part 2, No. 4266; Nigra, , lib. cit., XX. (1892), pp. 418 sqqGoogle Scholar. Four copies of ed. pr. are in the British Museum; one each in the Bodleian, in Rylands Library, Manchester, and in the Earl of Crawford's Library at Haigh Hall, Wigan. Blomfield, cites it as L in his edition of the Hymns (1815)Google Scholar for nearly 300 readings, misquoting it in about 30.

^{page 108 note 3} ῎Іϰνια μασγεύων кТλ.

^{page 108 note 4} On the significance of this innovation see Proctor, , op. cit., p. 78Google Scholar.

^{page 108 note 5} Maittaire, , op. cit., I., p. 103Google Scholar.

^{page 108 note 6} Maittaire, l.c.

^{page 109 note 1} Op. cit., pp. 79–80. He places the Callimachus in 1495. Maittaire, (op. cit., p. 105)Google Scholar points out that the Anthology must have been the first of this Alopa series, in view of its pre-fatory letter in which Lascaris explains the basis of his new type.

^{page 109 note 2} See below.

^{page 109 note 3} See below, p. 110.

^{page 109 note 4} See below, p. 110.

^{page 109 note 5} So Proctor, p. 79. If 1496 be the true date of I, Lascaris can hardly have removed to Paris in 1495, as Encyclopaedia Britannica states (art. Lascaris, Johannes).

^{page 109 note 6} See Proctor, , op. cit., p. 118Google Scholar.

^{page 109 note 7} Ibid.

^{page 109 note 8} So Nigra, , lib. cit., XX. (1892), p. 419Google Scholar.

^{page 109 note 9} Like Chrysoloras', Erotemata and Cebes', Πίναξ, of which Proctor (p. 79)Google Scholar says that ‘these small books may well have been set up after his departure, and in either case would not have taken long to print. They agree in every respect with the Lucian.’

^{page 109 note 10} In J.H.S. XV. (1895), p. 164Google Scholar. He regards it as possible that they are not direct copies of the same manuscript.

^{page 110 note 1} II's history before it came to Perugia is unknown, whereas we do know D to have been a Medicean MS. Hence the latter seems a more likely source than the former for Politian's and Lascaris' readings.

^{page 110 note 2} I assume the change from βαλоῖσα (so Q) to λαβоῖσα in S to be subsequent to Politian's publication of his text; we have seen that C. Lascaris used the latter elsewhere (pp. 66–7 above).

^{page 111 note 1} His other unsuccessful conjectures (first оσσα (108). edition) are εδιкασεν (V. 18), δαιμоν (39), and

^{page 112 note 1} See Omont, H., Inventaire Sommaire des Manuscrits grecs de la Bibl. Nat. (Paris, 1886–1898)Google Scholar; Allen-Sikes, , Homeric Hymns, p. ixGoogle Scholar; Schneider, , Praef. XXXIGoogle Scholar.; Ludwich, A., op. cit., p. 125Google Scholar.

^{page 112 note 2} Formerly Colbert 4906, Regius 3202. For the Homeric Hymns it is A; for Proclus, g.

^{page 112 note 3} Also in H.

^{page 112 note 4} See E. Martini and D. Bassi, op. cit.; Allen-Sikes, , op. cit., p. xGoogle Scholar; Schneider, , Praef. XXXIIGoogle Scholar.; Nigra, , lib. cit., XX. (1892), p. 203Google Scholar; Ludwich, , op. cit., p. 124Google Scholar.

^{page 112 note 5} Wilamowitz does not mention it. Schneider calls it f; but as it is closely akin to E, not F, I have renamed it e. For Homeric Hymns it is Q; for Proclus, b.

^{page 112 note 6} Ff. I. and V. are of parchment.

^{page 113 note 1} Cf. q.

^{page 113 note2} This lame line is found at the end of II ‘Parisian’ MSS. of the Homeric Hymns; see Allen-Sikes, ap. crit. to Hymn XXXIII. ad fin.

^{page 113 note 3} It oocurs also in H.

^{page 113 note 4} Christ, W. (Pindari Carmina, Teubner text, 1899, p. 2)Google Scholar reports that fr. I (1 Bergk = 4 Boeckh) is found in Laur. XXXII. 52.

^{page 113 note 5} See on BCK above, p. 6, note 4.

^{page 113 note 6} Contrast εὶς λоννρὰ Тῆς παλλὰδоς, most codd.: ѷμѵоς εὶς λоντρὰ Тῆς παλλὰδоς K: εὶς 'Аθηνᾶς λоʋТρά G.

^{page 113 note 7} Teubner text, 1880.

^{page 113 note 8} Lycophronis Alexandra (Berlin, Weidmann, 2 vols., 1881 and 1908)Google Scholar. It also differs from the short comments found in Hesychius, etc., on Фλοιδоύμενоς; see Pohl, p. 3, note 2.

^{page 114 note 1} E's third letter may be either ε or α: e has ἀνεγ.

^{page 114 note 2} The scholia of cod. Marcianus on 11. 1–34 are numerous, filling two pages of Kinkel's edition.

^{page 114 note 3} Praef. XXXI.

^{page 114 note 4} Tittmann, , Epist. Ruhnk. Valck. al., pp. 39–40Google Scholar, cited by Pohl, p. 2; Schneider, O., De locis quibusdam Callimachi lacunosis (Philologus, 1851, p. 512)Google Scholar, referred to by Pohl, p. 1.

^{page 114 note 5} Ad Callimachi hymnos et ad Graeca illorum scholia Parisiensium codicum duorum uarias lectiones enotauit G. Pohl (Posen, 1860)Google Scholar. His touchstones were the Tauchnitz (1829) edition for the Hymns, and Ernesti's for the scholia; his citations from the Hymns number nearly 440. Of fourteen mistakes in E. which he attributes to the ‘socordia et ignorantia librarii,’ seven, occurring also in e, must be ascribed to their common source, and indicate the fidelity, not the defects, of the writer of E.

^{page 114 note 6} e owes ὀ- to correction, and a space is left before it, in which Т probably stood.

^{page 115 note 1} Probably Ee's source had ὦ in different ink from the rest of the line; cf. some members of he z group passim.

^{page 116 note 1} There are also 211 minor cases, comprising 144 of accent, 26 of word-division, 17 of use or omission of iota subscr., 16 of breathing, and 8 of punctuation.

^{page 116 note 2} Add I. 10, where E attains παρρασίη by correction (παρνασίη e codd.); so do C and S, but E elsewhere shows no indebtedness to either.

^{page 119 note 1} Possibly an archetypal misdivision, corrected by cett.'s sources from the scholium here: ἐσσὴν кνρίως δ βασιλεὐς Тῶν μελισσῶν кТλ.

^{page 119 note 2} At III. 57 E'S margin emends τρινακίης of his conjecture to τρινακρίης: at III. 240 it annotates πρύλιν with πρύλην (? πρύχην: the word occurs, with this same doubt, in his text at I. 52). In seven places E's margin=e's text; viz. thrice in correcting E's own text (II. 6, ἀναкλίνεσθε: II. 8 χоρόν: V. 3, εѷТνкоς), thrice in recording the reading of his source beside his own conjecture (I. 26, πоλύσγТειоν: II. 4, ὲπὲνενσεν: VI. 38, ἐТιὸωνТо), and at III. 78 (кόρσιν, the alternative which E did not choose from the source's doublet).

^{page 119 note 3} Add the three marginalia just noted; V. 24–5, and VI. 38; and perhaps IV, 181.

^{page 120 note 1} Nigra, , lib. cit., XX. (1892), p. 228Google Scholar, cites кόρση from T's margin.

^{page 121 note 1} See Allen, T. W., Notes on Abbreviations in Greek Manuscripts (1889), pp. 12–14Google Scholar.

^{page 121 note 2} Id., ibid., pp. 15–16.