Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:17:38.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gelliana Graeca

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

P. K. Marshall
Affiliation:
Amherst College

Extract

The Vatican palimpsest (A) omits the word enthymemate and leaves a lacuna, thus showing that the scribe found it written as Greek in his exemplar. Now A has been shown to belong to the fourth century, and therefore its authority must be greater than that of the other manuscripts (twelfth and thirteenth centuries) available for this part of Gellius. The same problem occurs in 12.2.14, non pro enthymemate aliquo, where Hertz (followed by Hosius) goes against the Greek of the manuscripts and adopts the reading of Carrio. Yet an examination of the use of the Greek dative in Cicero's Letters will show that it can be used fully as the equivalent of a Latin ablative, can be governed by prepositions taking the ablative in Latin, and can be qualified by a Latin adjective in the ablative.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 179 note 1 See Hertz, M., Editio Maior (Berlin 18831885) ii, Praef., p. xvi.Google Scholar

page 179 note 2 See Lowe, , C.L.A., vol. i, no. 74.Google Scholar

page 180 note 1 Helmantica (1955), p. 73.Google Scholar