Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:52:07.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Friend Of Galen1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

C. P. Jones
C. P. Jones
Affiliation:
Harvard University/University College, Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 163 Galen gave an anatomy lesson in Rome before an audience that included ‘Demetrius of Alexandria, a friend of Favorinus, who was every day speakingin public on themes proposed to him, in the style and manner of Favorinus’

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , December 1967 , pp. 311 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 311 note 2 14. 627 K. Kühn's translation, ‘quotidie publice exponens ea, quae secundum Favorini dictionis speciem proponebantur’, is meaningless. Demetrius, like Favorinus (Philostratus, Vit. Sophist. 491), specialized in improvisation, allowing his audience to propose subjects (for this sense of , cf. Philostratus, ibid., 482, 529).

page 311 note 3 14.629 K. On Demetrius see Schmid, W., R.E. 4. 2845 no. 100;Google Scholar on the date, Ilberg, J., Neue Jhrb. xv (1905), 288 f.Google Scholar

page 311 note 4 5. 84. In favour of the identification: Gerth, K., R.-E. Suppl. 8. 744 no. 67.Google Scholar Against: Brzoska, , R.-E. 4. 2844 no. 96Google Scholar and Dittenberger, W. on O.G.I.S. 712.Google Scholar

page 311 note 5 de Ricci, S., Archiv f. Papyrusf., ii (1902 1903), 566, no. 127;Google ScholarDittenberger, , O.G.I.S. 712;Google ScholarBreccia, E., Cat. général, Musée d' Alexandrie, Iscrizioni greche e latine, no. 146.Google Scholar The text given above is substantially that of de Ricci and Breccia; Dittenberger, relying on a copy of Botti's, in the last line restored , mechanically adopted by Kiessling, E., Preisigkes Sammelbuch, no. 8914.Google Scholar

page 311 note 6 Vit. Sophist. 524. Despite the balance of , the emendation might be suggested.Google Scholar

page 311 note 7 Ibid. 524 (Dionysius of Miletus), 532 (Polemo).

page 311 note 8 Ricci, De, op. cit. 564, no. 112 (= A.E. 1903, 227).Google Scholar

page 311 note 9 Ibid. 492, 489.

page 312 note 1 Ricci, De, op. cit. 490, cf. 536. 537.Google Scholar

page 312 note 2 Forschungen in Ephesos 3. 145 no. 62 (cf. P.I.R.2 F 308). Hierax is also mentioned inconclusively in two other Ephesian inscriptions, the one unpublished but mentioned in P.I.R.2 A 1571, the other published in Anzeiger der oesterreich. Akad. der Wiss., Phil.- Hist, . Kl., xcvi (1959), 35.Google Scholar

page 312 note 3 Forsch. in Eph., ibid. On this phenomenon see A. Stein,Swoboda (1927), 300 ff.

page 312 note 4 Denkschr. Akad. Wien lvii. 1 (1914), 86 ff., no. 116 = I.G.R. 4. 1662.Google Scholar

page 312 note 5 Galen's wording does not show clearly whether or not Favorinus was still alive in 163; might imply that he was dead, and this is probable if he is rightly supposed to have be born ca. 80 (as by Mensching, E., Favorin von Arelate [1963], 1 n. 2).Google Scholar