^{page 140 note 1} In this article I include under the term ‘adjective’ the adjectival pronouns talis, ipse, quis, qui, etc., numerals, and past participles

^{page 143 note 1} I have not taken into account 31 and 284, because in each line the noun is qualified by an adjectsive inside the line as well as by the intital relative: 31 quae simul optatae finito tempore luces advenere, 284 quo permulsa domus iucundo risit odore.284 is, and 31 is not, a syntactical unit.

^{page 144 note 1} divam is of course a noun.

^{page 145 note 1} Cf. Fowler, , The King's English, p. 230 (3rd ed.).Google Scholar

^{page 145 note 2} The punctuation in M is the work of Asterius Apronianus, consul in 494.

^{page 147 note 1} I regard a relative as an ‘introductory word’ if it refers to what has gone before and does not agree with a noun in the same clause as itself. Contrast e.g. Cic. Phaen. 404 f. (p. 165), where quas and formal are in the same clause.

^{page 152 note 1} Cf. A. 7. 98, 164, 184.

^{page 152 note 3} Cf. A. 7. 125, 570, 8. 61.

^{page 154 note 1} Cf. G. 372 f., A. 1. 755 f., 5. 698 f., 760 f., 9. 205 f.

^{page 154 note 2} Cf. G. 1. 159, 2. 176, 540, 4. 498, A. 2. 297, 5. 182, 7. 322, 10. 212.

^{page 154 note 3} Cf. Hor. C. 1. 18. 1 nullam Vare sacra vite prius severis arborem circa mite solum Tiburis et moenia Catili. (surely circa … Catili is a colon.)

^{page 156 note 1} Cf. Horace, , Epod. 2. 43–44Google Scholar: sacrum vetustis extruat lignis focum lassi sub adventum viri.

Here adventum is a verbal noun.

^{page 158 note 1} Cf. Lucan 10. 198

et sacras populis notescere legesIlias Lot. 1007

et varies cineri ludorum indicit honores. and the pentameters Cat. 95. 8

et laxas scombris saepe dabunt tunicas. Tib. 1. 10. 42

et calidam fesso comparat uxor aquam.

^{page 160 note 2} Cf. Prop. 3. 5. 21

et multo mentem vincire Lyaeo Prop. 4. 2. 25

et torto frontem mihi comprime faeno Lucan 2. 357

et pictovestes discriminant auro Valerius Flaccus 7. 158

et fulvo Venerem vestigat OlympoNemesianus, , Eel. 2. 5Google Scholar

et molli gremium compleret acantho and the pentameter Ovid, , Fasti 2. 648Google Scholar

et solida ramos figere pugnat humo.

^{page 161 note 1} Cf. Kühner-Stegmann ii, 2, pp. 599 f.; Kroll, , Ghtta ix, 112 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 161 note 1} Cf. K¨hner-Stegmann ii. 9, p. 600.

^{page 161 note 2} Cf. A. 12. 607 resonant late plangoribus aedes.

^{page 163 note 3} But in the two enclosed units longer than the line in Cat. 64 the adjectives are special (97 f. qualibus …fluctibus, and 175 f. nee malus hie … hospes).

^{page 166 note 1} Cf. Virgil, A. 5. 1–2; Ovid, , Met. 6. 157–8.Google Scholar

^{page 166 note 1} Cf. Hor. Epod. 2. 43 sacrum vetustis exstruat lignis focum.

^{page 167 note 1} Here the adjective follows the noun. Cf. Amph. 405 me hue ems misit meus.

^{page 167 note 2} Cicero {De Sen. 6. 16) tells us that these words are from the speech of Appius Claudius Caecus (no doubt its opening) in which he dissuaded the senate from making a treaty with Pyrrhus. They are a good example of the use of wide ‘Sperrung’ to convey strong indignation. Cf. above Bacch. 842, Poen. 810, Trin. 214 and see Fraenkel, , I.u.A., pp. 114 and 163.Google Scholar