No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
It is universally held and in all classical Greek Grammars taught that in their numeral system, the ancient Greeks denoted the figure for 6 by the digamma or vau, that for 90 by the koppa, and that for 900 by the sampi or sanpi. On a closer examination, however, this doctrine proves erroneous and requires correction.
page 38 note 1 Compare Quint. 1. 4. 9 : koppa apud Graecos nunc tantum in numero manet.
page 39 note 1 The above curious facts—the formation of 
from I and Ο, and of ⊏ or ⌈⌉ from ⌈⌈—makes me sceptical about the view generally held that, in their palmiest days, the Athenians, being incapable of inventing a special phonetic symbol for the letter eta (B or H), or to evolve B out of El, decided, in their despair, to have recourse to the revival of the then obsolete or rather long extinct H, and that they transformed it from a previous rough breathing (H = h) into a future letter (H = η). Compare on this subject my Hist. Greek Grammar, p. 531.