^{page 38 note 1} ‘Codex Membranaceus XI.-XII. saec’ (MS. note by a modern librarian inside cover oj the MS. itself.)

^{page 39 note 1} The dotted y is of common occurrence in MSS. of this period.

Here H omits unice————urbis.

^{page 39 note 3} Mentioned in letters of Q. Aurelius Symmachus (end of fourth cent. A.D.).

^{page 40 note 1} Dianu, in his study of Codex Thuaneus (Introduction, p. 6), notes that this division into half decades was not infrequent.

^{page 40 note 2} Lindsay (Contractions in early Latin minuscule MSS.) mentions ẽ, eẽ, and eẽt as Notae Juris—really preminuscule contractions, which were gradually superseded.

^{page 40 note 3} At the bottom of fol. 56 (verso):

Titi Li Vii Nicomachvs Dextervm Emndari Ad Exemplvm Parentis Mei Clementiani Ab Vrbe Cond Victorianvs Emendabam Domnis Simmachis Liber. V. Explicit.

At the top of fol. 57 (recto):

Titi Livii Tincomachvs Dextervm Emendari Ad Exemplv *** Parentis Mei Clementiani Ab Vrbe Cond Victorianvs Emendabam Domnis Symmss.) Machis. Liber Qvintvs Explicit.

Incipit Liber VI.

^{page 40 note 4} Professor Walters has noted the same dislocation in D at this point; but it does not appear in H, nor has it been noted in any other MS., though there is some evidence of corruption: vide Drak.'s note, cited in Table C, ad loc.

^{page 41 note 1} ‘Ipsi haud dubie inter bonos et praestantes L₁, et H₁, qui quam sint cognati ex eiusmodi mendis communibus nee ad ullos praeterea propagatis intelligi potest.’ Drak. vol. vii. pp. 321–322. Drakenborch, writing in 1746, computed the age of H at seven or eight centuries, and of L at six or seven centuries, and he ranks L as second only to the Florentinus (M), vide Drak., loc. cit. H is now assigned by the British Museum authorities to the tenth century, L by the Leiden authorities to the eleventh or twelfth century.

^{page 42 note 1} For an account of the chief MSS. referred to, see Professor Walters’ article in the Classical Quarterly, July, 1908.