No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Cicero, Brutus 304–5
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Extract
In an otherwise convincing article Mr. T. P. Wiseman argues that this passage ‘seems to mean (a) that L. Memmius and Q. Pompeius were principes, i.e. outstanding orators, and (b) that they were not among those who spoke in their own defence in 90 B.C.’. But he rightly refuses to believe that Cicero can have intended this, since, apart from other considerations, it is clear from Cicero's previous references to Memmius and Pompeius that he did not consider them to be outstanding orators.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1968
References
page 412 note 1 ‘Lucius Memmius and his Family’ in C.Q. N.s. xvii (1967), 164–7.Google Scholar
page 412 note 2 For Memmius see section 136; for Pompeius section 206. That the L. Memmius mentioned in section 136 is identical with the L. Memmius in the present passage is demonstrated by Wiseman, , op. cit. 166, n. 1.Google Scholar
page 412 note 3 Biedl, A., ‘De Memmiorum familia’, Wiener Studien xlviii (1930), 98–107, at p. 100.Google Scholar
page 412 note 4 For this idiom see Kühner-Stegmann, , Lateinische Grammatik, i. 623 f.;Google Scholar Madvig, Latin Grammar, para. 489b, and his note on De Finibus 4. 16. 43, ‘Hi ponunt illi quidem prima naturae, sed ea seiungunt a finibus et summa bonorum.’ Numerous examples are cited by Pease, A. S. on De Nat. Deor. 2. 117 (p. 844).Google Scholar
page 412 note 5 Sections 37, 70, 115, 128, 136, 140, 167, 177, 178, 227, 239, 240, 259, 267, 305.