Article contents
Παλίοντονον and Eὐθύτονον
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Extract
Great advances have been made of late years in the understanding of ancient artillery, but the difference between the παλíντινιν and the εὐθ⋯τινιν seems to remain a riddle still inviting solution. In tentatively accepting the invitation, we are met at the outset by a certain amount of fog due to the fact that ancient guns were classed by two methods which produce a cross division. It will pay us to dispel this fog, or at any rate to find our bearings in it as exactly as may be, before going further.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1920
References
page 85 note 1 It seems unnecessary now to combat the old view (due to Rüstow and Köchly again) that the μινάγκεν was a late invention: it is accepted now as known in all periods of ancient artillery.
page 86 note 1 Whether the passage of Philo (V. p. 91, 35 ed. Th.), cited above, carries the full implication can hardly be decided.
- 1
- Cited by