Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:07:40.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aeschylea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

A. D. Fitton Brown
Affiliation:
University College of North Wales, Bangor

Extract

Are we to restore ‘sit on eggs’ after Hesychius or ‘cry ’, ‘lament’ after Nauck? In his recent supplement to the Loeb Aeschylus, Mr. Lloyd-Jones says that the latter ‘is far better suited to the context’, by which I am given to understand that he means that Aeschylus would have been very unlikely to employ the brooding metaphor in this passage. Admonished by Wilamowitz (Interpretationen, p. 57 n.) that ‘es unverzeihlich ist, das Bild der briitenden Henne zu vertreiben’, I fall back in some bewilderment on the fact that I personally like it very much and that the tomb-nest symbolism, though not absolutely presupposed by Cho. 247 ff. and 501(), would certainly have encouraged the poet to write these later passages. But there is a dearth of objective argument on this matter which I want, if possible, to supply.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 79 note 1 Here again I suspect that we should restore the present tense.

page 79 note 2 So Wellmann, , Real. Enc. iii. 2115;Google Scholar D'Arcy Thompson, , Glossary of Greek Birds, p. 311.Google Scholar

page 80 note 1 It would be a welcome consequence of eliminating from this passage if Professor Fraenkel would now allow us to restore middle at Ag. 304. After all Aeschylus wrote something and the possibilities are circumscribed.

page 81 note 1 A further argument in its favour is the fact that, as Stanford remarked (C.P. xxxiii. 307), there is no other instance of tout court, ‘young of animals’, and what we need is a corrective epithet. Young vultures are ‘children that nest on high’, just as fish are ‘children without voice’.Google Scholar

page 83 note 1 I do not find Untersteiner's attempt to meet this point convincing.