No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
In words familiar to us all St. Paul observes that in Christ there is “neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free.” This is usually, and I think correctly, not taken to mean that the Apostle's ideal is the abolition of human distinctions in a blank uniformity. His own love for the figure of the Body with its various members suggests rather the maintenance of differences, freed from the stigma of inferiority, in the harmony of corporate life. We were reminded last year of the importance of the Barbarian, that is the non-Greek element in the Christian tradition. My subject this address is one of the chief representatives of another element—the Roman. Neither in the passage just quoted nor in the similar one in Galatians does the Roman appear in St. Paul's listing of the differences capable of being united in Christ. But St. John tells us that the titulus upon the cross of Jesus was written in Latin as well as in Hebrew and Greek. Pious as well as scholarly comment has seen in his emphasis on this point a reference to the place of Roman along with Greek and Jew in the Christian body, and in so doing has probably sensed correctly the intent of the Evangelist. Certainly the Roman striving for liberty under law is of great concern for us today, when the alternative to law appears to be not anarchy but despotism.
1a Colossians 3:11.
2 Buckler, F. W., “Barbarian and Greek—and Church History,” Church History, XI, 3–32.Google Scholar
3 Gregory the Great, Epistles, xiii, 34Google Scholar (the Epistles are quoted by Ewald and Hartmann's numbers).
4 The Dialogues of Gregory the Great, tr. P. W., edited Gardner, Edmund G. (London and Boston, 1911).Google Scholar
5 Hodgkin, Thomas, Italy and Her Invaders (Oxford, 1895), VGoogle Scholar, “Lombard Invasion.”
6 Dudden, F. H., Gregory the Great (London, 1905).Google Scholar
7 Batiffol, Pierre, Saint Grégoire le Grand (Paris, 1927)Google Scholar; English translation by John L. Stoddard (London, 1929).
8 II Corinthiais 11:28.
9 e. g., Epistles xiii, 40.Google Scholar
10 Cf. descriptions in Hodgkin, R. H., History of the Anglo-Saxons (Oxford, 1935), I, 269–273Google Scholar; Clapham, A. W., English Romanesque Architecture before the Conquest, (Oxford, 1930), 17–33Google Scholar; the Church of the Quatuor Coronati in Bede, , Historia Ecclesiastica, II, 7.Google Scholar
11 Bede, , Historia Ecclesiastica, IV, 2.Google Scholar
12 Council of Cloveshoe, 747, Canon 17.
13 xxvii, 21 (11).
14 Moralia, proem.; cf. discussion in Dudden, op. cit., I, 196–198.
15 Epistles, xiii, 50.Google Scholar
16 Wilhelm Peitz, S. J., Liber Diurnus, in Sitzungsberichte der Wiener Akademie, (1918) Bd. 185, 1–140.Google Scholar
17 Lamentations 4:1.
18 Ezekiel 44:20.
19 Pastoral Care, i, 7.Google Scholar
20 Moralia, xix, 27 (18).Google Scholar
21 Moralia, xxxi, 10.Google Scholar
22 Epistles, i, 24.Google Scholar
23 Epistes, xiv, 12.Google Scholar
24 Cf. disaussion in Duehesne, L., Christian Worship, tr. McClure, M. L. (5th ed., London, 1919), 123BGoogle Scholar: and Batiffol, Pierre, History of the Roman Breviary, tr. Bayley, A. M. Y. (3rd ed., London, 1912), 41–46.Google Scholar
26 Epistles, xi, 26.Google Scholar
26 Bishop, Edmund, The Genius of the Roman Rite (London, 1902).Google Scholar
27 Interesting parallels to its petitions may be found in Dialogues, iv, 55–58.Google Scholar
28 Kennedy, V. L., C. S. B., The Saints of the Canon of the Mass (Studi di Antichita Cristiana, XIV), (Vatican City, 1938).Google Scholar
29 Frere, W. H., Studies in Early Roman Liturgy, I, The Kalendar (Oxford, 1930), 76–83, 93, 98Google Scholar: Wyatt, E. G. P., St. Gregory and the Gregorian Music (London, 1904).Google Scholar
30 Klauser, Th., Dos römische Capitulare Evangeliorum (Münster, 1935)Google Scholar; Frere, W. H., Studies in Early Roman Liturgy, vol. ii, The Roman Lectionary (Oxford, 1934)Google Scholar; the internal evidence of the Homilies analyzed in Pfcilschifter, G., Die authentisehe Ausgabe der 40 Evangelienholmilien Gregors des Grossen (Veröffentlichungen aug dem Kirchenhistorisehen Seminar München, Munich, 1900).Google Scholar
31 i, 1.
32 xxxi, 11–70
33 Cf. the conference which interrupts the collection of the legend of Bishop Fortunatus in Dialogues, i. 10.Google Scholar
34 i, 12.
35 iv, 59.
36 iii, 36.
37 iii, 19, 28.
38 Cf. discussion of this in Mortimer, R. C., The Origins of Private Penance in the Western Churches (Oxford, 1939), 170–187.Google Scholar
39 Cf.Butler, Cuthbert, Western Mysticism (London, 1924), 213–241.Google Scholar
40 Moralia, i, 20, (14).Google Scholar
41 Cf. references and discussion in Butler, op. cit., 91–133.
42 Cf. chronological table in Dudden, , Gregory, II, 472–3.Google Scholar
43 Epistles, xiii, 30Google Scholar; xiv, 15.
44 A quotation which I cannot carry further than the source from which Batiffol took it—Krüger, G., Des Papsttum (Religionsgeschichtliche Volksbücher, IV, 1, Tübingen, 1907), 24.Google Scholar
45 Italy and Her Invaders, VI, 452.Google Scholar
46 Gregory the Great, II, 281.Google Scholar
47 Epistles, xiii, 34Google Scholar; on Gregory's style Cf.Sister Dunn, M. Borromeo, The Style of the Letters of St. Gregory the Great (Catholic University of America Patristic Studies, XXXII), (Washington, 1931).Google Scholar
48 St. Grégoire le Grand, 232.