Article contents
Saint Louis' Involvement with the Friars
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
The literature popular among students at Paris in the 1260's included a series of poems lamenting the ascendant role in society of the new mendicant orders. The Dominicans are so shrewd, said one of these poems, that they control both Paris and Rome, they are both king and apostle. The blame for this state of affairs was being placed squarely on Louis IX. The king favors the mendicants, read a second poem, yet ill-treatrs his knights, as if the friars could do anything useful for the defense of his kingdom.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Church History 1964
References
1. Bastin, J. and Faral, E., ed., Onze poèmes de Rutebeuf concernant la croisade (Paris, 1946), pp. 35–42Google Scholar. Denkinger, T., “Die Bettelorden in der französischen didaktischen Literatur des 13. Jahrhunderts, besonders bei Rutebeuf und im Roman de la Rose,” Franziskanische Studien, II (1915), p. 97.Google Scholar
2. Recueil des Historiens des Gaulles et de la France, XXIII, p. 150.Google Scholar Hereafter cited as HF.
3. Ibid., XX, p. 94.
4. Chenu, M. D., “Moines, clercs, laics au carrefour de la vie évangelique,” Revue d'histoire ecclésiastique, XLIX (1954), pp. 60–80.Google Scholar
5. Grundmann, H., Religiöse Bewegungen im Mittelater (Berlin, 1935), p. 118.Google Scholar
6. From the Annales Normannae, cited by Chenu, M. D., Saint Thomas d'Aquin et La théologie (Paris, 1960), p. 7.Google Scholar
7. Emery, Richard W., The Friars in Medieval France (New York, 1962), p. 3.Google Scholar
8. Aron, M., Un animateur de la jeunesse au 13e siècle: vie, voyages du bx Jourdain de Saxe (Paris, 1930), p. 158.Google Scholar
9. Wadding, L., Annales Minorum, 3rd ed., 25 vols. (Quaracehi, 1931-1934), II, p. 182.Google Scholar
10. HF, XX, p. 10.
11. de la Marche, A. Lecoy, La Chaire francaise au Moyen-âge (Paris, 1868), p. 476.Google Scholar
12. HF, XX, p. 75.
13. Ibid., p. 71.
14. Ibid., p. 73.
15. C. V. Langlois in the Lavisse series, III, pt. 2, 26, n. 1.
16. Rishanger, William, Chronica et Annaies Regnantibus Henrico Tertio et Edwardo Primo, ed. Riley, H. T., Rolls Series #28, pt. 2 (London, 1865), pp. 74–75.Google Scholar Cited by Kantorowicz, E. H., Laudes Regiae, A Study in Liturgical Acclamations and Mediaeval Ruler Worship (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1946), p. 77.Google Scholar
17. S. Bonaventurae Opera Omnia, ed. Fathers of the Collegio Santa Bonaventura, 10 vols. (Quaracchi, 1882–1902), IXGoogle Scholar, “Sermones,” passim.
18. Glorieux, P., “Essai sur la chonologie de Saint Bonaventure (1257-74),” Archivum franciscanum historicum, XIX (1926), p. 146.Google Scholar
19. Callébaut, A., “La deuxième croisade de Saint Louis et les Franciscains (1267-70),” La France franciscaine, V (1922), pp. 282–88.Google Scholar
20. HF, XX, pp. 90 and 93.
21. Salimbene de Adam, Cronica, ed. Holder-Egger, O., Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Scriptores, XXXII (Hanfoyer and Leipzig, 1913), pp. 221–25.Google Scholar
22. Le Nain do Tilemont, L. S., Vie de Saint Louis, ed. de Gnulle, J. P., 6 vol. (Paris, 1847-1851), V, p. 370.Google Scholar
23. HP, XX, p. 92.
24. Besides the minister-and master-generals, priors, bishops, missionaries, messengers, confessors, professors, and others that can be named, many friars at Compiègne, Paris, Seas were surely known to the king.
25. Strayer, J. R., The Administration of Normandy Under Saint Louis (Cambridge, Mass., 1932), pp. 93 and 27.Google Scholar
26. Rigaud, Eudes, Registrum Visitationem archiepiscopi rothomagensis, ed. Bonnin, Théodose (Rouen, 1832), pp. 290, 402, 420-21, 212, 322, 355.Google Scholar
27. Ibid., p. 399.
28. Ibid., p. 495.
29. HP, XXIV, especially the introductory essay by Delisle.
30. Paris, Matthew, Chronica Majora, ed. Luard, H. R., Rolls Series #57, 7 vols. (London, 1872–1883), IV, p. 579.Google Scholar
31. Vincent of Beauvais, De Eruditione Filiorum Nobiliuin, ed. Steiner, A. (Cambridge, Mass., 1938).Google Scholar
32. Gilbert of Tournal, Eruditio Regum et Principum, ed. de Poorter, A. (“Les Philosophes Belges,” IX, Louvain, 1914).Google Scholar
33. Kantorowicz, B. H., The King's Two Bodies, A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology (Princeton, 1957), p. 208.Google Scholar
34. Campbell, G. J., “The Attitude of the Monarchy Toward the Use of Ecclesiastical Censure in the Reign of Saint Louis,” Speculum, XXXV (1960), pp. 554-55.Google Scholar
35. Prof. Robert Branner of Columbia University kindly helped me with this list.
36. Little, A. G., Studies in English Franciscan History (Manchester, 1917), pp. 35–39.Google Scholar
37. Formoy, B., The Dominican Order in England Before the Reformation (London, 1925), pp. 76–77.Google Scholar
38. Layettes du trésor des chartes, IV, pp. lxi, 119–23, 171, 210–15.Google Scholar
39. Enquêtes administratives d'Alphonse de Poitiers, 1249-1271, ed. Fournier, P. and Guébin, P. (Paris, 1959).Google Scholar
40. Dimier, A., Saint Louis et Cîteaux (Paris, 1954), pp. 53–59.Google Scholar
41. Berger, E., Histoire de Blanche de Castille (Paris, 1895), p. 415.Google Scholar
42. Jean, Sire de Joinville, Histoire de Saint Louis, ed. de Wailly, N. (Paris, 1874), p. 407.Google Scholar
43. Delaborde, H. F., “Instructions d'un ambassadeur envoyé par Saint Louis aà Alexandre IV à l'occasjon du traité de Paris (1258),” Bibliothèque de l'école de Chartes, XLIX, 1888, pp. 630–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. Campbell, G. J., ”The Protest of Saint Louis,” Traditio, XV (1959), pp. 417–18.Google Scholar
45. Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis, ed. Denifle, H. and Chatelain, A., I (Paris, 1889)Google Scholar, hereafter cited as CUP, #230.
46. CUP, #237.
47. CUP, #240.
48. Thomas of Cantimpré, Bonum universale de Apibus (Douai, 1627), p. 175.Google Scholar
49. CUP, #257, #258.
50. William of Saint Amour, “Tractatus Brevis de Periculis Novissimorum Tomporum,” Opera Omnia (Coutances, 1632).Google Scholar
51. CUP, #268-#270.
52. MS., Erfurt, Amplon Q 170, listed by Msgr. Glorieux, , Répertoire des maîtres en théologie à Paris au XIIIe siécle, 2 vols. (Paris, 1933–1934), I, p. 345.Google Scholar I am deeply indebted to Mlle d'Alverny of the Bibliothèlque nationale for presenting me to M. Dufeil of the University of Algiers who is working on William of Saint Amour. M. Dufeil brought this sermon to my attention and very graciously permitted me to use a microfilm of the Erfurt MS. as well as his transcription The relevant portion of the text follows (f. 174r, lines 38 to 50):
Peccatum ypocrisis in paucis esse solebit modo in tantum crevit quod devenit usque ad episcopos. parochiales sacerdotes. milites. burgenses. reges et principes et similiter de multibus. Unde similiter dolendum eat unde in media nocte modo reges surgunt ad matutinas dicendas et in die audiunt sex paria missarum ad votum et dimittunt causas pauperum sequentiumn curiam suarn indiscussas et non portarent unam pulchram robam (interlin.: vestem) tamen bene permitterent unum bellum oriri vel fieri in quo mule christiani interficerentur. bene do suis extorsionibus redderent X solidos vel V sed nullo modo redderent unam comitivam nec unam villam vol casteilum. ot tamen a scripturis non habemus quod reges debent surgere ad matutinas de nocte et cetera et quod debere induere vestes do villi pano. sed bene invenio quod debent induere vestes preciosissimas non in talibus consistit officium regis sed in faciendo judicum et justitiam et judicando abbacias et ecclesias et do sedendo et procurando pacem sua terre. Ieronimus — utere deliciis non pro to sod pro regno ut timorem .i. curias ad justicias exercendas. ipse loquitur cuidam regi qui forte benignus erat et ideo ordinavit ecclesia quod papa equitat curn freno de strig. aurato bene et rubea que potest invenire et ferunt milites scilicet quando equitat unum pannum do serico super caput eius. non deberent regibus consulere homines boni quodessent begini sed quod facerent elcmosinas et vacarent semper iusticie et judicia facienda. Unde decretum dicit XXIII q V Regum est facere justitia et iudicium non invenitur quod rex debeat esse beginus. de nobis clericis notandum….
53. CUP, #289.
54. Faral, E., “Les Responsiones de Guilaume de Saint-Amour,” Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyenâge, XXV-XXVI (1950–1951), pp. 337–94.Google Scholar
55. CUP, #288.
56. CUP, #308 and #321.
57. CUP, #315.
58. Bastin, and Faral, , Onze poèmes do Rutebeuf…, pp. 4, 35–42.Google Scholar
59. Langlois, E., Origines et sources du Roman de la Rose (Paris, 1890), pp. 153-60.Google Scholar
60. Joinvile, ed. de Wailly, pp. 18-20.
61. Kantorowicz, E. H., Laudes Regtoe…, p. 4.Google Scholar
62. Enlart, C., Manuel d'Archéologie française, III, “Le Costume” (Paris, 1916), pp. 389-91.Google Scholar
63. Quoted in Coulton, G. G., From Saint Francis to Dante (London, 1907), p. 405.Google Scholar
64. HF, XX, p. 7.
65. Ibid., p. 8.
66. Acta Sanctorum. August, V. pp. 446-49. Also, Little, A. G., Franciscan History and Legend in English Medieval Art (Manchester, 1937), pp. xv–xvii.Google Scholar
67. For an illuminating commentary on the conflict between kingly and monastic ideals, comparing this conflict as expressed in Byzantium with the way it was in the West, see Ladner, Gerhart B., The Idea of Reform (Cambridge, Mass., 1959) pp. 107–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11
- Cited by