Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:48:32.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Russian Mystic Faces the Age of Rationalism and Revolution: Thought and Activity of Ivan Vladimirovich Lopukhin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Alexander Lipski
Alexander Lipski
Affiliation:
Professor of History, California State College at Long Beach*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is generally accepted that even though rationalism was predominant during the eighteenth century, a significant mystical trend was simultaneously present. Thus it was not only the Age of Voltaire, Diderot, and Holbach, but also the Age of St. Martin, Eckartshausen and Madame Guyon. With increased Western influence on Russia, it was natural that Russia too would be affected by these contrary currents. The reforms of Peter the Great, animated by a utilitarian spirit, had brought about a secularization of Russian culture. Father Florovsky aptly summed up the state of mind of the Russian nobility as a result of the Petrine Revolution: “The consciousness of these new people had been extroverted to an extreme degree.” Some of the “new people,” indifferent to their previous Weltanschauung, Orthodoxy, adopted the philosophy of the Enlightenment, “Volter'ianstvo” (Voltairism). But “Volter'ianstvo” with its cult of reason and belief in a remote creator of the “world machine,“ did not permanently satisfy those with deeper religious longings. While conventional Orthodoxy, with its emphasis on external rites, could not fill the spiritual vacuum, Western mysticism, entering Russia chiefly through freemasonry, provided a satisfactory alternative to “Volter'ianstvo.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 1967 , pp. 170 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Florovskii, G., Puti Russkago Bogosloviia (Paris, 1937), p. 114Google Scholar. The following studies have been specifically devoted to the life of Lopukhin: Athanas'ev, A., “I.V. Lopukhin,” Arkhiv Istoricheskie i prakticheskie Svedeniia Otnositel'no do Rossi (St. Petersburg, 1860), I, 1–60Google Scholar; Surovtsev, A. G., Ivan Vladimirovich Lopukhin (St. Petersburg, 1901)Google Scholar; Piksanov, N., “Ivan Vladimirovich Lopukhin,” in Mel'gunov, S. P. and Sidorov, N. P., eds., Masonstvo v ego Proshlom i Nastoiashchem (hereafter referred to as Masonstvo) (Moscow, 1914) I, 227–55Google Scholar; Barskov, I., “Lopukhin, Ivan Vladimirovich,” Russkii Biograficheskii Slovar' (St. Petersburg, 1896–1918), X 650–82.Google Scholar

2. Florovskii, , pp. 115–16;Google ScholarSemeka, A. V., “Russkoe Masonstvo v XVIII Veke,” Masonstvo, I, 134–35Google Scholar; Semeka, A. V., “Russkie Rozenkreitsery i Sochineniia Imperatritsy Ekateriny II Protiv Masonstvo,” Zhurnal Ministerstva Narodnago Prosveshcheniia (02, 1902), p. 346.Google Scholar

3. Kliuchevskii, V. O., “Vospominanie o N. I. Novikove i ego Vremeni,” Sochineniia (Moscow, 1959), VIII, 240Google Scholar.

In his just published book, The Icon and the Axe (New York, 1966)Google Scholar, Professor James H. Billington gives recognition to Lopukhin as one of the chief leaders of the Anti-Enlightenment, op. cit., p. 271.

4. Zapiski Nekotorykh Obstoiatel'stv Zhizni i Sluzhby Deistvitel'nago Tainago Sovetnika, Senatora I. V. Lopukhina, Sochinenyia Im Samin, Russkii Arkhiv, I (1884), 1–154.Google Scholar

5. Kliuchevskii, , p. 240.Google Scholar

6. Martinism derived from the French mystic L. C. de St. Martin (1743–1803) whose work Des Erreurs et de la Verité was highly esteemed in freemasonic circles. Erroneously the freemasons were called Martinists. Actually, St. Martin was only one among the many Western mystics who influenced the Russian freemasons. Longinov, M. N., Novikov i Moskovskie Martinisty (Moscow, 1867), p. 179Google Scholar. According to Kizevetter, the term was used for Rosicrucians only. See Kizevetter, A., “Moskovskie Rozenkreitscry XVIII stoletiia,” Russkaia Mysl', XXXVI:10 (10, 1915), 97.Google Scholar

7. Gertsen, A. I., “Zapiski I. V. Lopukhin,” Sobranie Sochineniia V Tridtsati Tomakh (Moscow, 1954), XIV, 297.Google Scholar

8. Underhill, E., Mysticism (New York, 1955) p. 70.Google Scholar

* All dates are according to the Old Style which was eleven days behind the New Style (Gregorian Calendar) in the eighteenth century and twelve days behind it in the nineteenth century.

9. Zapiski, p. 3.

10. Ibid., p. 4, 7.

11. Ibid., p. 15.

12. Loc. cit. In this study the reprinted edition of Razsuzhdenie … in Drug Iunoshestva (February, 1809), 38–51, has been used.

13. Razsuzhdenie …, 38–48.

14. Ibid., pp. 49–50.

15. Longinov, , p. 99.Google Scholar

16. Bogoliubov, V., N. I. Novikov i Ego Vremia (Moscow, 1916), p. 140Google Scholar; Kheraskov, I. M., “Proiskhozhdenie Masonstva i ego Razvite v Anglii XVIII i XIX V.,” Masonstvo, I, 15–22Google Scholar; Waite, A. E., A New Encyclopedia Of Freemasonry (London, 1921), I, 333Google Scholar; Vernadskij, G., “Beiträge zur Geschichte der Freimaurerei und des Mystizismus in Russland,” Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie, IV (1927), 163.Google Scholar

17. Waite, A. E., The Secret Tradition in Freemasonry (London, 1937), pp. 532–88Google Scholar; Semeka, , Russkoe Masonstovo v XVIII Veke, 133–39.Google Scholar

18. Semeka, , p. 162.Google Scholar

19. Longinov, , pp. 177–78.Google Scholar

20. Zapiski, pp. 17–18.

21. Surovtsev, p. 23; “Otvety Novikov Sheshkovskomu v Schlusselburge, v Iune 1792,” Longinov, p. 085; “Voprosnye punkty statskomu sovetniku I. V. Lopukhin,” Ibid., p. 0125, Piksanov, p. 230.

22. Surovtsev, p. 29.

23. Zapiski, p. 7.

24. Ibid., Pp. 6, 9–10.

25. Ibid., p. 11.

26. Ibid., p. 14.

27. Ibid., p. 30–31.

28. Nekotoryia Cherty in Savodnik, V. T. “Masonskie Trudy I. V. Lopukhine,” Materialy poiatorii Russkago Masonstva XVIII – go Veka (Moscow, 1913), pp. 5–11, 15–16.Google Scholar

29. Ibid., pp. 40–45.

30. Chizevskii, D. (Tschizewskij), Russland zwischen Ost und West: Russische Geistesgeschichte II (Hamburg, 1961), p. 51.Google Scholar

31. Nekotoryia Cherty, pp. 46–50.

32. Ibid., pp. 50–57.

33. Ibid., p. 14.

34. Zapiski, p. 23, Barskov, p. 674.

35. Dukhovnyi Rystar, Savodnikov, op. cit., p. 4, Katikhizis, Ibid., pp. 43–46.

36. Ibid, p. 283, Surovtsev, p. 23; Barskov, p. 657. Vernadskij, G., “Le Césarévich Paul et les Francs-Macons de Moscou, “Revue des Etudes Slaves, III (1923), 268–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37. Barskov, p. 657, Longinov, pp. 272, 284–86.

38. Zapiski, p. 23, 49; Tikhonravov, op. cit., V:2, p. 16.

39. Longinov, pp. 314–15, 335–36.

40. Barskov, 662; Tikhonravov, V:2, pp. 23–36; “Zapiski o Martinistakh,” Russkii Arkhiv, IX (1875), 77.Google Scholar

41. Bogoliubov, pp. 440–41; Eshevskii, 415.

42. Zapiski, pp. 38–45; “Voprosnye punkty statskomu sovetniku I. V. Lopukhin,” Longinov, pp. 0125–0141; Tikhonravov, V:2, 61.

43. Kizevetter, pp. 111–12.

44. “In one word, Catherine was a model of a great sovereign and her reign was most beneficent for Russia, except for several victims of her vainglory, especially during wars whose object was not always the true interest and security of the empire, and also except for her forbearance toward luxury …” Zapiski, p. 53.

45. Izlianie Serdtsa (Kaluga, 1794), pp. 43–44, 30–32.Google Scholar

46. Surovtsev, pp. 61–62. The actual tract Vopl 'starinnago sud'y was not available to the author.

47. “Zapiski o Martinistakh,” pp. 76–78.

48. Zapiski, pp. 65–66.

49. Zapiski, p. 82. Slobdskaia Ukraine (from sloboda meaning free settlement) comprised the Belgorod and Voronezh region.

50. Zapiski, pp. 90–92, 96–97.

51. Ibid., p. 97.

52. Glas Iskrennosti, p. 371. See also letter to editor, July 12, 1806, Sionskii Vestnik (December 1817), 369–70.

53. Ibid., pp. 373–76; 382–83.

54. “Zamechanie na izvestnuiu knigu Russovy du Contrat Social,” Sionskii Vestnik (February, 1806), 218–24.

55. “Otryvki sochineniia odnogo starinnago Sud'i” Drug Iunoshestva (October, 1808), 14–18.

56. Zapiski, pp. 106, 110–12, 114–16, Surovtsev, pp. 83–85.

57. Zapiski, p. 123.

58. Ibid., pp. 139–40.

59. Lopukhin to Kutuzov, November 28, 1790, Barskov, Perepiska Moskovskikh Masonov XVIII Veka, p. 47.Google Scholar

60. Zapiski, p. 31.

61. “Zapiski o Martinistakh,” pp. 75–81. “Moskva v 1812 godu,” Russkii Arkhiv, VIII (1875), 383.Google Scholar

62. Lopukhin to D. P. Runich, April 26, and May 10, 1814, Russkii Arkhiv (1870), 1225–1228. Runich was in charge of the Moscow Post Office at the time he corresponded with Lopukhin. Ibid., p. 1215.

63. Zapiski, p. 149.

64. “Otryvok iz poslaniia M. I. Nevzorova k O. A. Pozdeevu,” (hereafter referred to as “Otryvok”), Bibliograficheskiia Zapiski XXI (1858), 658Google Scholar. “Pis'ma I. V. Lopukhin k M. M. Speranskomu,” Russkii Arkhiv (1870), 609–622; Surovtsev, pp. 99–102, 234. Tikhonravov, , Sochineniia, III: iii, 154.Google Scholar

65. Lopukhin to Runich, January 7, 1813, and November 17, 1813, Russkii Arkhiv (1870), 1217–1219.

66. “Nechto dlia razmyshleniia o Molitve i sushchnosti Khristianstva,” Drug Iunoshestva, (December 1814), 88–124.

67. Barskov, pp. 673, 676.

68. “Otryvok,” p. 646.

69. Voeikov, A. E., “Vospominanie o sole Savinskom i o dobrodetel'nom ego khoziaine,” Novosti Litteratury, (05, 1825), 75.Google Scholar

70. Piksanov, pp. 233–34.

71. “Iz staroi zapisnoi knizhki nachatoi v 1813 godu,” Russkii Arkhiv, V (1875), 102.Google Scholar

72. Ibid., Russkii Arkhiv, (1873), 2149–50; “Vospominaniia Fedora Petrovicha Lubianovskago,” Russkii Arkhiv, X (1872), 136.Google Scholar

73. Undated letter from Speranskii to Lopukhin, Ibid., (1870), 624–626.

74. Ibid., p. 250.

75. Florovskii, pp. 113–16; 254, Bakounine, T., Le Repertoire biographique des francs-macons russes (Brussels, 1938), xl.Google Scholar

76. Pypin, A. N., Religioznyia Dvizhenia Pri Aleksandre I (Petrograd, 1916), p. 423.Google Scholar