Article contents
Religion and the Wyatt Rebellion of 1554
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
In his book Two Tudor Conspiracies, D. M. Loades challenged the traditional view among historians that the Wyatt rebellion was influenced by Protestant concerns over the Catholic policies of Mary Tudor. In Loades' account of the event, religion played no prominent part; the conspirators were secular and anti-clerical, but otherwise their religious convictions remain “shadowy.” Loades contends that apart from William Thomas, the well-known Protestant enthusiast, “all had conformed without protest under Edward, and those still alive were to do so again under Elizabeth, but throughout the period of the rebellion and trials which followed it, all protested their loyalty to the Catholic Church.” The real reasons for the revolt, he asserts, were secular and political—namely, fear of foreign domination through the Queen's intended marriage to Philip of Spain.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Church History 1978
References
1. Loades, D. M., Two Tudor Conspiracies (Cambridge, 1965)Google Scholar and his more recent books: The Oxford Martyrs (New York, 1970), pp. 123–124Google Scholar; Politics and the Nation 1450–1660 (London and Glasgow, 1974), pp. 226–232, 236.Google Scholar
2. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 16.Google Scholar
3. Ibid., p. 88.
4. Reviews by Williams, in English Historical Review 82 (01, 1967): 159–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Rabb, in American Historical Review 71 (07, 1966): 1325–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Ferguson, in Journal of Modern history 39 (03, 1967): 172–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Supporters of Loades' thesis include Dickens, A. G., The English Reformation (New York, 1964), p. 261Google Scholar;, Pill, David, The English Reformation 1529–58 (London, 1973), p. 178Google Scholar; and Elton, G. R., Reform and Reformation (London, 1977), pp. 380–382.Google Scholar
5. Slavin, A. J., The Precarious Balance (New York, 1973), p. 192.Google Scholar
6. Russell, Conrad, The Crisis of Parliaments (London and New York, 1971), p. 139Google Scholar. See also D. M. Pallister, “Popular Reactions to the Reformation During the Years of Uncertainty,”in Heal, Felicity and O'Day, Rosemary, eds., Church and Society in England: Henry VIII to James I (London, 1977), p. 42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Fletcher, Anthony, Tudor Rebellions (London, 1968), p. 87Google Scholar. A similar interpretation is Jones, Whitney R. D., The Mid-Tudor Crisis (New York, 1973), pp. 94–95.Google Scholar
8. There were no less than five different changes of the established religion during this period. Yet, by Edward's reign, doctrinal differences separating Catholic and Protestant were carefully demarcated in official government pronouncements on matters of faith. Cardinal Catholic doctrines, such as purgatory and prayers for the dead, the use of images, clerical celibacy and Catholic priesthood all were denied, and such Protestant doctrines as justification by faith, predestination and the correct form of church service emphatically were proclaimed. It will be argued here that the Wyatt conspirators tended to be staunch supporters of the religious policies of the Edwardian regime. For Protestantism under Edward, see Haigh, Christopher, Reformation and Resistance in Tudor Lancashire (Cambridge, 1975), pp. 139–177Google Scholar; Jordan, W. K., Edward VI: The Threshold of Power (London, 1970), pp. 362–4011Google Scholar; and Davies, Horton, Worship and Theology in England, 1534–1603 (Princeton, 1970), pp. 3–39.Google Scholar
9. Pill, David, The English Reformation, pp. 166–167.Google Scholar
10. Ibid., p. 168; Hughes, Philip, The Reformation in England (London, 1954) 2:195Google Scholar; Maclure, Millar, The Paul's Cross Sermons (Toronto, 1958), p. 50.Google Scholar
11. Hughes, Paul L. and Larkin, James F., eds., Tudor Royal Proclamations II (New Haven and London, 1969), pp. 67–68.Google Scholar
12. Pill, , The English Reformation, p. 168.Google Scholar
13. Hughes, , The Reformation 2:196Google Scholar; Brooks, Peter, Thomas Crammer's Doctrine of the Eucharist (New York, 1965), pp. 72–111, and especially p. 77, n. 3Google Scholar; Loades, , Oxford Martyrs, pp. 117–118.Google Scholar
14. The Chronicle of Queen Jane and Queen Mary, ed. John Gough Nichols, Camden Society, Old Series, Vol. 48 (London, 1850), p. 33.Google Scholar
15. Muller, James A., Stephen Gardiner and the Tudor Reaction (New York, 1926), p. 243.Google Scholar
16. Garrett, Christina, The Marian Exiles (Cambridge, 1938), p. 3.Google Scholar
17. Holinshed, Raphael, Chronicles, (London, 1808), 4:36.Google Scholar
18. Calendar of Slate Papers, Spanish, Edward VI and Mary, 1553 (London, 1916) 2:472Google Scholar (hereafter, C.S.P., Spanish); Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 22.Google Scholar
19. Calendar of the Patent Rolls, Philip and Mary, Vol 2, 1554–1555 (London, 1936), pp. 47; 124–125; 177; 201–202; 293Google Scholar; Harbison, E. Harrison, Rival Ambassadors at the Court of Queen Mary (Princeton, 1940), p. 111, n. 6Google Scholar; Loades, , Conspiracies, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
20. Pollard, A. F., The History of England, 1547–1603 (London, 1910), pp. 107–108Google Scholar; Harbison, , Rival Ambassadors, pp. 112–113.Google Scholar
21. Harbison, , Rival Ambassadors, p. 111.Google Scholar
22. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 79.Google Scholar
23. C.S.P., Spanish, 1554 12:42.Google Scholar
24. See P. 9.
25. Dictionary of National Biography (hereafter D.N.B.) (London, 1921) 4:1261Google Scholars.v. “Edward Courtenay.” See Courtenay, Edward, Earl of Devonshire, A Treatise… of the Benefit that True Christians Receive by the Death of Jesus Christ, in Babington, Churchill, ed., The Benefit of Christ's Death… (London and Cambridge, 1855)Google Scholar. Undoubtedly the pamphlet's advocacy of predestination (pp. 177–178) accounts for its appeal to Protestants.
26. C.S.P., Spanish, 1554, 12:108.Google Scholar
27. MacCaffrey, Wallace, The Shaping of the Elizabethan Regime (Princeton, 1968), p. 445Google Scholar. In Elizabeth's reign Croft spoke out against the Puritans, which is an indication of his moderation on religion. Neale, J. E., Elizabeth l and Her Parliaments, 1559–1581 (New York, 1966), pp. 199, 202.Google Scholar
28. Among his instructions from the Privy Council is the admonition that religion was to be “cherished.” C.S.P., Ireland, 1509–1573, p. 117.Google Scholar
29. Calendar of the Carew Manuscripts, 1515–1574, (London, 1867) pp. 226, 231Google Scholar; Bagwell, Richard, Ireland Under the Tudors (London, 1963), 1:360.Google Scholar
30. Bagwell, , Ireland pp. 365–368Google Scholar
31. Mant, Richard, History of the Church of Ireland (London, 1840), 1:209–210.Google Scholar
32. Portland Papers, PWV83, University of Nottingham Library, Nottingham, Eng., no foliation; Ham, R. E., “The Autobiography of Sir James Croft,” Bulleltn of the Institute of Historical Research 50 (05, 1977):48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Adair, E. R., “William Thomas: A Forgotten Clerk of the Privy Council,”in Seton-Watson, R. W., ed., Tudor Studies (New York, 1970), pp. 135, 138, 147.Google Scholar
34. Ibid., p. 147; Narratives of the Reformation, “Autobiography of Thomas Hancock,” Camden Society, Old Series, Vol. 77 (London, 1859), p. 83.Google Scholar
35. Rowse, A. L., Ralegh and the Throckmortons (London, 1962), pp. 11, 14, 18, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward VI, Vol. 3 (London, 1925), p. 137Google Scholar. Strype, John, Ecclesiastical Memorials, 2, pt. 2:164.Google Scholar
37. Chronicle of Queen Jane and Queen Mary, pp. 12–13.
38. Nichols, John Gough, ed., The Legend of Sir Nicholas Throckmorton (London, 1874), p. 29.Google Scholar
39. Holinshed, , Chronicles, 4:42.Google Scholar
40. C.S.P., Spanish, 1558–1567, p. 37.Google Scholar
41. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 39.Google Scholar
42. The Carews were among the leading Protestants of the county. See Hoskins, W. G., Devon (London, 1959), pp. 283, 427.Google Scholar
43. Hooker, J., The Life… of Sir P. Carew (London, 1857), pp. 111–112.Google Scholar
44. Ibid., p. 111; Rose-Troup, Frances, The Western Rebellion of 1549 (London, 1913), p. 107Google Scholar; Polwhele, Richard, The History of Devonshire (London, 1747), pp. 290–291.Google Scholar
45. Hooker, , Life, p. 111.Google Scholar
46. C.S.P., Spanish, 1554, p. 16.Google Scholar
47. C.S.P., Domestic, 1547–1580, p. 72.Google Scholar
48. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 107.Google Scholar
49. Strype, John, Ecclesiastical Memorials, (London: 1731) 3:95.Google Scholar
50. Original Letters Relative to the Reformation Vol. 1, ed. Hastings Robinson (Cambridge, 1842), p. 3Google Scholar; D.N.B. 8:629, s.v. “Henry Grey.”
51. Memoirs and Remaini of Lady Jane Grey ed. Harns Nichols (London, 1831), p.xxiiGoogle Scholar; Mathew, David, Lady Jane Grey (London, 1972), p. 132.Google Scholar
52. C.S.P., Spanish, 1553, p. 332.Google Scholar
53. C.S.P., Spanish, 1554, p. 125.Google Scholar
54. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 17.Google Scholar
55. C.S.P., Spanish, 1550–1552, p. 218.Google Scholar
56. C.S.P., Foreign, 1547–1553, ed. William B. Turnbill (London, 1861) pp. 176–77.Google Scholar
57. Ibid., p. 250.
58. The Zurich Letters, Cormprising the Correspondence of Several English Bishops and others, with Some Helvetian Reformers, during the Early Part of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth, ed. Hastings Robinson, Vol. 1, 1st Ser. (Cambridge, 1842), p. 34.Google Scholar
59. Strype, John, The Life of John cheke in Works (Oxford, 1822), p. 951Google Scholar; Garrett, , Marion Exiles, pp. 272–273Google Scholar; D.N.B., 17:118Google Scholar, s.v. “Sir Edward Rogers.”
60. Camden, William, The Historie of the Most Renowned and Victorious Princesse Elizabeth (London, 1630), pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
61. D.N.B., 22:75, s.v. “Sir Nicholas Arnold.”
62. Letters and Papers of henry VIII, ed. James Gairdner (London, 1890) 12(1):831Google Scholar; Powell, K. G., “The Social Background to the Reformation in Gloucestershire,” Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society 92 (1973):116.Google Scholar
63. Ibid., p. 118.
64. Proctor, John, The History of Wyats Rebellion, in Tudor Tracts, ed. Pollard, A. F. (London, 1903), pp. 201–257.Google Scholar
65. The Papers of George Wyatt, ed. D. M. Loades (London, 1968), pp. 181–205.Google Scholar
66. Ibid., pp. 181–182.
67. Ibid., p. 181.
68. Ibid., pp. 200–201.
69. Loades, , Conspiracies, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
70. Thomson, Patricia, Sir Thomas Wyatt and His Background (Stanford, California, 1964), pp. 62–69.Google Scholar
71. Hasted, Edward, A History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent (Canterbury, 1797) 4:451Google Scholar; Fuller, Thomas, The History of the Worthies of England, ed. Nuttall, P. Austin (London, 1840) 2:152.Google Scholar
72. Original Letters Relative to English Reformation 1:36–37.Google Scholar
73. The Papers of George Wyatt, p. 9.
74. Thomson, , Wyatt, p. 74.Google Scholar
75. The Papers of George Wyatt, p. 165.
76. Ibid., pp. 167–168.
77. Ibid., p. 168.
78. Ibid., p. 167.
79. Ibid., p. 165.
80. Ibid., p. 164–165; Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 50.Google Scholar
81. Quoted in Lehmberg, Stanford E., Sir Walter Midmay (Austin, Texas, 1954), p. 40.Google Scholar
82. Holinshed, , Chronicles 4:42.Google Scholar
83. Neale, , Parliaments 1:148Google Scholar; Russell, , Crisis of Parliaments, p. 138.Google Scholar
84. Harbison, , Rival Ambassadors, p. 126.Google Scholar
85. For factual detail, Loades' account is superior to all others. Conspiracies, pp. 25–88. See also Muller, , Stephen Gardiner, pp. 236–244Google Scholar; Prescott, , Spanish Tudor, pp. 287–313.Google Scholar
86. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 34.Google Scholar
87. Ibid., p. 40; C.S.P., Spanish 12:82.Google Scholar
88. Proctor, , Historie, pp. 212–213Google Scholar; Chronicle of Queen Jane and Queen Mary, p. 36.
89. C.S.P., Spanish, 12:79.Google Scholar
90. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 65.Google Scholar
91. Foxe, John, Acts and Monuments of John Foxe, ed. Cattley, Stephen Reed (London, 1837) 6:414–415.Google Scholar
92. Ibid., p. 413.
93. Proctor, , Historie, p. 210.Google Scholar
94. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 55.Google Scholar
95. The government's counter-propaganda emphasized that Wyatt was a religious extremist in order to discredit him with the populace. The effectiveness of this approach suggests that Wyatt was wise in not stressing religion, but in attempting to appear as a leader aiming at removing “evil councilors” and prohibiting the entrance of Spaniards. For governmental propaganda, see C.S.P., Spanish, 01–07 1554, pp. 55, 78Google Scholar, and the Queen's speech of 1 February, printed in Foxe, , Acts and Monuments 6:414.Google Scholar
96. Stow, John, Annals (London, 1631), p. 620Google Scholar; Garrett, , Marian Exiles, p. 254Google Scholar; Hudson, Winthrop S., John Ponet (Chicago, 1942), pp. 64–65.Google Scholar
97. The Sermons of Edwin Sandys, ed. John Ayre (Cambridge, 1841), p. ix.Google Scholar
98. Loades construes this to mean that Protestant leaders were estranged from Wyatt's cause. (Conspiracies, p. 87.) In The Oxford Martyrs (pp. 116–117), however, he suggests that failure to rebel involved commitment to lawful authority: this was undoubtedly a powerful motive whether or not Protestants harbored sympathies for Wyatt.
99. Fletcher, , Tudor Rebellion, p. 90Google Scholar. Another example contrary to Loades' thesis is that of Sir William Pelham, a Protestant gentleman from East Sussex. See Manning, Roger B., Religion and Society in Elizabethan Sussex (Leicester, 1969), p. 264.Google Scholar
100. Loades, , Conspiracies, p. 87.Google Scholar
101. According to the list printed in Maitland, S. R., The Reformation in England (London, 1904)Google Scholar, there were three men burned at Rochester, two at Maidstone, and two at Ashford. It is generally agreed that there were fifty-eight burnings in Kent, of which thirty-nine were men. For a discussion of the Marian martyrs, see Dickens, , The English Reformation, pp. 264–272.Google Scholar
102. Loades, , Two Tudor Conspiracies, pp. 87–88.Google Scholar
103. Cox, J. C., Churchwarden's Accounts (London, 1913), pp. 3–14Google Scholar; Campbell, Mildred, The English Yeuman (London, 1960), pp. 325–331.Google Scholar
104. C.S.P., , Venetian, 1534–1554, p. 560Google Scholar; de Noailles, Messieurs, Ambasades en Angleterre, ed. de Vertot, R. A. and Villaret, C. (Leyden, 1763) 3:16, 22.Google Scholar
105. See Wiatt, William H., “The Lost History of Wyatt's Rebellion,” Renaissance News, 15 (Summer, 1962): 130CrossRefGoogle Scholar. A similar explanation was offered by Christopherson, John, An Exortation to Alle Menne to Take Hede and Beward of Rebellion (London, 1554), no pagination.Google Scholar
106. Holished, , Chronicles 4:11Google Scholar; Stow, JohnAnnales (London, 1631), p. 613.Google Scholar
107. Elton, G. R., England Under the Tudors (London, 1955), pp. 420–421.Google Scholar
108. Prescott, , A Spanish Tudor, p. 282.Google Scholar
109. Muller, , Stephen Gardiner, p. 239.Google Scholar
110. Bradford, John, The Copye of a letter, sent by John Bradforth to the Erles of Arundel, Darbie, Shrewburye and Pembroke, declaring the nature of the Spaniards… (N.P., n.d. [1556]).Google Scholar
111. Maltby, William S., The Black Legend in England (Durham, NC., 1971), p. 29.Google Scholar
112. Ponet, John, A Short Treatise of Politike Power, printed in Hudson, Ponet, pp. 93–94, 122.Google Scholar
113. Ibid., pp. 165–167.
114. Goodman, Christopher, How Superior Powers Ought to be Obeyed (Geneva, 1558), p. 118.Google Scholar
115. Ibid., pp. 135, 209–13; The Writings of John Bradford, ed. Aubrey Townsend (Cambridge, 1848), pp. 425, 428.Google Scholar
116. Holinshed, , Chronicles 9:41.Google Scholar
- 8
- Cited by