Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T13:58:31.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Regaining of Faith: Reconversions among Popular Radicals in Mid-Victorian England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Timothy Larsen
Timothy Larsen
Affiliation:
Timothy Larsen is a professor of church history at Tyndale Seminary, Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is a wealth of literature on Victorian religious doubt, and much of it is structured by implicitly defining pure faith in the context of nineteenth-century England as an organized, traditional, orthodox, trinitarian, and supernatural version of Christianity and then herding together people who deviate from this ideal at various points into vague categories such as “unbelief,” “infidelity,” “irreligion,” “honest doubt,” or “freethought.” Members of the numerically impressive group which is thereby constructed are then said to represent a strong trend that is given labels such as “the Victorian crisis of faith,” “the loss of faith,” or “secularization.” Much of this historiography is imbued with a Whig interpretation: these figures are seen as part of an inevitable movement toward the abandonment of religious beliefs by thinking people in the modern age as they progressed toward a more credible worldview. Indeed, the considerable attention that is paid to such people in the literature despite the fact that the Victorian age is often simultaneously declared to have been an extraordinarily religious one seems to be tacitly justified on the grounds that, although these figures may have been out of step with thespiritual confidence of their own generation, they were in step with the march of truth. The rhetoric of “honest doubt” is often tinged with the notion that a full appreciation of the fruits of modern thought and scientific inquiry would almost automatically lead to the abandonment of religious views; it is not just “honest” in the senseof candidly avowed and not derived from unworthy motives, but, rather, it is as if an “honest” examination ofthe facts could lead only to religious doubt. A contention of this study is that these interpretative tendencies have obscured a notable and telling countervailing pattern.

Type
Articles
Information
Church History , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 527 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hugh McLeod has also suggested recently that the literature is unbalanced: “Mean while the Victorian ‘crisis of faith ’ continued to be a subject of absorbing interest, and, if anything, claimed a disproportionately large share of the space in the Parsons collection.” McLeod, Hugh, Religion and Society in England, 1850–1914 (New York: St. Martin's, 1996), 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar His reference is to Parsons, Gerald, ed., Religion in Victorian Britain, Vols. 1, 2, and 4 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988).Google Scholar The dissemination of this approach can be seen, for example, in Melinda Corey and Ochoa, George, eds., The Encyclopedia of the Victorian World (New York: Henry Holt, 1996), which has an entry on Charles Bradlaugh, but not Charles Spurgeon.Google Scholar

2. Willey, Basil, More Nineteenth Century Studies: A Group of Honest Doubters (London: Chatto & Windus, 1956).Google Scholar

3. Cockshut, A. O. J., The Unbelievers: English Agnostic Thought, 1840–1890 (London: Collins, 1964).Google Scholar

4. For example, George Eliot looms large in Turner, Frank, “The Victorian Crisis of Faith and the Faith that was Lost,” in Victorian Taith in Crisis: Essays on Continuity and Change in Nineteenth-Century Religious Belief, eds. Helmstadter, R. J. and Lightman, Bernard (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990), 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Moore, James R., “ Theodicy and Society: The Crisis of the Intelligentsia,” in Victorian Faith in Crisis, 153–80.Google Scholar

6. For example, in addition to the sources cited below, McCalman, I. D., “Popular Irreligion in Early Victorian England: Infidel Preachers and Radical Theatricality in 1830s London,” in Religion and Irreligion in Victorian Society: Essays in Honor of R. K. Webb, eds. Davis, R. W. and Helmstadter, R. J. (London: Routledge, 1992), 51–67.Google Scholar

7. Most notably, Royle, Edward, Victorian Infidels: The Origins of the British Secularist Movement, 1791–1866 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1974)Google Scholarand Radicals, Secularists, and Republicans: Popular Freethought in Britain, 1866–1915 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1980). I have never met Royle, but I am grateful to him for answering several questions I put to him in writing and thereby facilitating my pursuit of relevant primary sources.Google Scholar

8. Budd, Susan, “The Loss of Faith: Reasons for Unbelief among Members of the Secular Movement in England, 1850–1950,” Past and Present 36 (1967): 106–25CrossRefGoogle Scholarand chap. 5 in Varieties of Unbelief: Atheists and Agnostics in English Society, 1850–1960 (London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1977).Google Scholar

9. By using Secularist obituaries as her primary database, Budd's study automaticallyexcluded the voices of reconverts. The existence of this pattern is noted in Smith, F. B., “The Atheist Mission, 1840–1900,” in Ideas and Institutions of Victorian Britain: Essays in Honour of George Kitson Clark, ed. Robson, Robert (London: Bell, 1967);Google Scholar and Watts, Michael R., The Dissenters: Volume II (Oxford: Clarendon, 1995), 561–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Reasoner, 11 August 1852.Google Scholar

11. For Cooper's life, in addition to his celebrated autobiography (cited below), see Conklin, Robert J., Thomas Cooper, the Chartist (1805–1892) (Manila: University of the Philippines Press, 1935).Google Scholar

12. Investigator, August 1858.Google Scholar

13. Reasoner, 29 August 1858. For Barber's political activities, see his entry in Bellamy, Joyce M. and Saville, John, eds., Dictionary of Labour Biography (London: Macmillan 1977), 4: 6–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. National Reformer, 2 August 1862.Google Scholar

15. National Reformer, 25 June 1876.Google Scholar

16. No women reconverts have been found, but this is not surprising, as Budd and others have noted that popular infidelity was largely a male world.Google Scholar

17. Amsterdam, Internationaal Istituut Voor Sociale Geschiedenis, Coll. Cooper, ThomasCooper to Charles Kingsley, 22 June 1856.Google Scholar

18. Investigator, January 1857.Google Scholar

19. It should also be noted that their final theological ideas were generally (if not invariably) much more nuanced than their views had been during their earlier Christian identity. Joseph Barker's final view of the nature of the Bible is a telling example of this: Barker, Joseph, The Bible, Its Great Worth and Divine Origin (Philadelphia: Methodist Episcopal Book-Room, 1873).Google Scholar

20. Budd emphasizes the role of a moral critique of Christians and Christian teaching, the reading of radical literature, and doubts that arise from studying the Bible. She also discusses factors such as detachment from families and old communities and rebellion against fathers.Google Scholar

21. Bebbington, J. B., Why I Was an Atheist, and Why 1 Am Now A Christian, 2d ed. (London: H. J. Tresidder, [1864]), 5.Google Scholar

22. Bebbington, Why I Was an Atheist, 5.Google Scholar

23. [Barker, Joseph], The History and Confessions of a Man, as Put Forth by Himself(Wortley: J. Barker, 1846), 186–87.Google Scholar

24. Manchester, John Rylands University Library, Joseph Barker Case Correspondence, Benjamin Barker to William Cooke, 20 January 1845.Google Scholar

25. Lincoln, Lincolnshire Archives, Misc. Don. 2 Bapt 2, Thomas Cooper lecture notes, “The Being, Power & Wisdom of God: the Design Argument re-stated: selection of striking instances of Design,” (Hall of Science, London), 21 September 1856.Google Scholar

26. Sexton, George, The Fallacies of Secularism (London: G. S. Sexton, 1877), 56.Google Scholar

27. Sexton, Fallacies of Secularism, 45.Google Scholar

28. One recurring application of this was that unbelief did not offer any hope or comfort to the dying.Google Scholar

29. Gordon, J. H., The Public Statement of Mr. J. H. Gordon, (Late Lecturer to the Leeds Secular Society), with Reference to his Repudiation of Secular Principles, and his Adoption of the Christian Faith (Leeds: J. Hamer, 1862), 7.Google Scholar

30. Barker, Joseph, Modern Skepticism: A journey through the Land of Doubt and Back Again; a Life Story (Philadelphia: Smith, English & co., 1874), 238–39.Google Scholar

31. Bebbington, Why I was an Atheist, 10.Google Scholar

32. Sexton, George, The Folly of Atheism (London: G. S. Sexton, 1880).Google Scholar

33. Reasoner, 11 August 1852.Google Scholar

34. Barber, Jonathan, The Apology for Renouncing Infidel Opinions of Jonathan Barber, Frame-Work Knitter (Nottingham, [1859]), 10.Google Scholar

35. Six Nights' Discussion between Thomas Cooper and Joseph Barker, held in St. George Hall, Bradford, September, 1860 (London: Ward and co., n.d.), 63, 93; Bebbington, Why 1 was an Atheist, 10–15.Google Scholar

36. The People, 2: 101 (1850).Google Scholar

37. For example, Sexton, Folly of Atheism, 21–31.Google Scholar

38. Ellison, W. S., Statement Delivered by W. S. Ellison, (Formerly a Secularist) in Ebenezer Chapel, Leeds, On Wednesday Evening, Oct. 8, 1862, Containing his Reasons for having Abandoned Secularism, and an Account of his Conversion (Leeds: Charles Goodall, A. Mann, & B. Summersgill, [1862]), 12–13.Google Scholar

39. Bebbington, Why I was an Atheist, 15.Google Scholar

40. For the latter, see Cooper, Thomas, God, the Soul, and a Future State (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1874).Google Scholar For Cooper's career as a popular Christian apologist, see Larsen, Timothy, “Thomas Cooper and Christian Apologetics in Victorian Britain,” Journal of Victorian Culture 5 (2000): 239–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41. Sexton, George, Reasons for Renouncing Infidelity (London: G. S. Sexton, 1876), 5.Google Scholar

42. Barker, Joseph, The Inspiration of the Sacred Scriptures(Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: J. Barker, n.d.).Google Scholar

43. Barker, Joseph, Confessions of Joseph Barker, a Convert from Christianity (London: Holyoake, 1858), 9.Google Scholar

44. For a scholarly sketch of Barker's life, see his entry in Baylen, J. O. and Gossman, N. J., eds., Biographical Dictionary of Modern British Radicals: Vol. 2: 1830–1870 (Hassocks: Harvester, 1984), 38–41.Google Scholar For his career as an anti-Bible lecturer, see Larsen, Timothy, “Joseph Barker and Popular Biblical Criticism in the Nineteenth Century,” Bulletin of the JohnRylands University Library of Manchester 82 (2000): 115–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45. Barker, Joseph, Teachings of Experience, or, Lessons I have Learned on my Way through Life (London: E. W. Allen, 1885), 281.Google Scholar

46. Barker, Modern Skepticism, 325–26.Google Scholar

47. Cooper, Thomas, The Life of Thomas Cooper, Written by Himself (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1872), 352.Google Scholar

48. Cooper, God, the Soul, and a Future State, 99.Google Scholar

49. Gordon, The Public Statement of Mr. J. H. Gordon, 10.Google Scholar

50. Gordon, J. H., Just-What-You-Like-Ism. A Brief Explanation of Mr. G. j. Holyoake's “Principles of Secularism Briefly Explained” (Leeds: J. Hamer, 1863), 93.Google Scholar

51. Bebbington, Why I Was an Atheist, 24.Google Scholar

52. Sexton, Fallacies of Secularism, 85.Google Scholar

53. Norfolk News, 10 April 1858. See also, Bradford Review, 15 May 1858.Google Scholar

54. For this kind of self-help, see Harrison, Brian, Drink and the Victorians: The Temperance Question in England, 1815–1872 (London: Faber and Faber, 1971).Google Scholar

55. Sexton, Reasons for Renouncing Infidelity, 45.Google Scholar

56. Six Night's Discussion between Thomas Cooper and Joseph Barker, 153.Google Scholar

57. Barker, The Bible, Its Great Worth and Divine Origin, 31–33.Google Scholar

58. Sexton, Reasons for Renouncing Infidelity, 33.Google Scholar

59. Thompson, E. P., The Making of the English Working Class (London: Victor Gollancz, 1965), 375–400.Google Scholar

60. Royle, Victorian Infidels, 190.Google Scholar

61. Reasoner, 12 August 1860, 261–62.Google Scholar

62. Murray, A. D., John Ludlow: The Autobiography of a Christian Socialist (London: F. Cass, 1981), 149.Google Scholar

63. For mid-Victorian popular radicals and Spiritualism, see Barrow, Logie, Independent Spirits: Spiritualism and English Plebeians, 1850–1910 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986).Google Scholar For a recent study of Besant's phases of faith and unbelief, see Bevir, Mark,“Annie Besant's Quest for Truth: Christianity, Secularism and New Age Thought,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 50 (1999): 62–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

64. Most notably, see Bruce, Steve, ed., Religion and Modernization: Sociologists and Historians Debate the Secularization Thesis (Oxford: Clarendon, 1992).Google Scholar For a recent, insightful survey of the relevant historiography, see the introduction and conclusion in Green, S. J. D., Religion in the Age of Decline: Organisation and Experience in Industrial Yorkshire, 1870–1920 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar