Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:22:14.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Reformation and the Decay of Medieval Ideals*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Lacey Baldwin Smith
Affiliation:
Northwestern University

Extract

Over a generation ago Lucien Febvre wrote a short article on the origins of the Reformation which he called “Une question mal posée.” Today the question remains just as “mal” as it ever was, and the modern historian who ventures forth into these eristic fields of study will find that time has in no way mitigated the full vigor of the historiographical and theological controversy that surrounds the Protestant Reformation. Some scholars have endeavoured to find the secret of the upheaval in the political machinations of unscrupulous princes and the dynastic ambitions of rival sovereigns. Others of a more social and economic bent prefer some variant of the school of economic determinism. The institutional historian tends to see the Reformation as part of the growth of the centralized national state while yet others say that the revolt was the result of corruption and abuse within the mother institution itself—the Catholic Church. Those who see the movement as part of the vast intellectual revolution of the era, hail the Protestant revolution as the “coming-of-age” of medieval Europe—the emancipation of the laity and the lay mind from the tutelage of the ecclesiastical. It is unnecessary to enumerate further. The only point which I have to contribute along these lines is to say that all of these suggested reasons fail to explain adequately three aspects of the Reformation which historians at least have tended to ignore.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Febvre, L., “Une question mal posée: les origines de la réforme française et le probléme général des causes de la réforme,” Revue Historique, CLXI (1929), pp. 173.Google Scholar

2. The most available summary of the causes of the Reformation is MacKinnon, James, The Origins of the Reformation, London: 1939.Google Scholar

3. Foxe, John, Acts and Monuments, ed. Townsend, G., London: 1847, vol. VII, p. 550.Google Scholar

4. Strayer, J. R. and Munro, D. C., The Middle Ages, New York: 1942, p. 440.Google Scholar

5. Oman, Charles, The Sixteenth Century, New York: 1936, p. 33.Google Scholar

6. This quotation was taken from Tawney, R. H. (Religion and the Rise of Capitalism, Pelican edition; 1947, p. 35)Google Scholar who has improved considerably upon St. Antonino's original statement that “Production is on account of man, not man of production.” See Jarrett, Bede, S. Antonino and Mediaeval Economics, London: 1914, p. 59.Google Scholar

7. Bucer, Martin; quoted in Schapiro, J. S., Social Reform and the Reformation, Columbia University Dissertation, New York: 1909, p. 22.Google Scholar

8. Memoirs of Benvenuto Cellini, Trans. Roscoe, Thomas, London: 1883, p. 104.Google Scholar

9. Longman, J. A., A Sermon spoken before the Kinge his Maiestie at Greenwiche, upon Gopd Fryday, London: 1536,Google Scholar Sig. Eii-Eiii.

10. More, Sir Thomas, English Works, edit. Campbell, , Reed and Chambers; London: 1931, vol. I, pp. 468470.Google Scholar

11. Sykes, Norman, The Crisis of the Reformation, London: 1938, p. 25.Google Scholar

12. Quoted in Vallari, P., Life and Times of Girolamo Savonarola, London: 1888, p. 113Google Scholar from Savonarola's “Della Orazione Mentale.”

13. Quoted in Bainton, R. H., Here I Stand, A Life of Martin Luther, New York: 1951, p. 45Google Scholar. See also Beard, Charles, Martin Luther and the Reformation in Germany, London: 1896, pp. 157162.Google Scholar

14. Quoted, in Beard, , Martin Luther, p. 162.Google Scholar

15. Bainton, R. H., The Reformation of the Sixteenth Century, Boston: 1952, p. 53.Google Scholar

16. Quoted in Bainton, R. H., Here I Stand, p. 65.Google Scholar

17. SirMore, Thomas, English Works, London: 1557, pp. 207208Google Scholar; Gairdner, James, Lollardy and the Reformation in England, London: 1908, vol. I, p. 399.Google Scholar

18. Foxe, John, Acts and Monuments. vol. IV, p. 635.Google Scholar

19. Ibid, p. 635.