Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:27:56.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philipp of Hesse's View of the Relationship of Prince and Church

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Alton O. Hancock
Alton O. Hancock
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Religion, Centenary College of Louisiana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Philipp of Hesse's style as a Christian prince had some unusual aspects. He came under the influence of the Reformation during a formative period for himself and his territory and developed his princely self-understanding and the ecclesiastical constitution of Hesse in dialogue with the evangelical movement. Both the man and the land bore the indelible stamp of the encounter.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , June 1966 , pp. 157 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See the discuserton in Hartung, Fritz, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte von 15. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart, (Stuttgart, 1950), pp. 77–80.Google Scholar

2. Carsten, F. L., Princes and Parliaments in Germany (Oxford, 1959) p. 151.Google Scholar

3. Schenk zu Schweissberg, Gustav F., “Aus der Jugendzeit Landgraf Phillipps des Grossmütigen,” Philipp der Grossmütige: Beiträge zur Geschichte seines Lebens und seiner Zeit (Marburg, 1904), p. 124.Google Scholar

4. Carsten, , Princes, p. 159.Google Scholar

5. , J. Pistor, “Tilemann Schnabel,” Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie, XXXII (Leipzig, 1811), 81.Google Scholar

6. Joachimsen, Paul, Die Reformation als Epoche der Deutschen Geschichte (München, 1951), p. 99.Google Scholar

7. Hermann, Fritz, “Zum Gedächtnis Philipps des Grossmütigen,” Philipp der Grossmütige: Beiträge zur Geschichte seines Lebens und seiner Zeit (Marburg, 1904), p. 3.Google Scholar

8. Hassencamp, F. W.. Hessische Kirchengeschichte seit dem Zeitalter der Reformation (Frankfort, 1864), I, pp. 37–38.Google Scholar

9. Quoted in Küach, Friedrich, “Landgraf Philipp und die Einführung der Reformation in Hessen,” Zeitschrift der Vereins für hessische Geschichte und Landeskunde, XXXVIII (1904), 212.Google Scholar

10. Franz, Günther, et al. , eds., Urkundliche Quellen zur hessischen Reformationsgeschichte (Marburg, 1954), II, 1–6.Google Scholar

11. Robert Stupperich, , ed., Melauehthons Werke (Gütersloh, 1951), I, 179–189.Google Scholar

12. Sohm, Walter, Territorium und Reformation in der hessischen Geschichte 1526–1555 (Marburg, 1957), p. 27.Google Scholar

13. Urkundliche Quellen, II, no. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar

14. The name of the recipient is missing, but the letter is to a Marburg Franciscan. See Urkundliche Quellen, II, p. 3, note 1.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., no. 4 pp. 7–8.

16. Egelhaaf, Gottlob, “Landgraf Philipp der Grossmütige,” Schriften des Vereins für Reformationsgeschichte, VII (1904), 7.Google Scholar

17. Holborn, Hajo, A History of Modern Germany: The Reformation (N. Y., 1959) p. 174.Google Scholar

18. Joaehimsen, , Die Reformation, p. 170.Google Scholar

19. Urkundliche Quellen, II. no. 5, pp. 8–9.Google Scholar

20. Ibid., no. 13, pp. 12–13.

21. Ibid., no. 7, pp. 9–10.

22. Kidd, B. J., ed., Documents Illustrative of the Continental Reformation (Oxford, 1911), no. 90, p. 185.Google Scholar

23. Küeh, , “Einführung,” p. 218.Google Scholar

24. Hassencamp, , Kirehengeschichte, I, 62, note 1.Google Scholar

25. Walter, Heiuemeyer, ed., Politisches Archive des Landgrafen Philipp des Grossmütigen (Marburg, 1954), III, 156.Google Scholar

26. Müller, Gerhard, Frans Lambert von Avignon und die Reformation in Hessen (Marburg, 1958), p. 35f.Google Scholar

27. Urkunädliche Quellen, II, no. 29B, p. 21.Google Scholar

28. For a summary of Lambert's theses (Paradoxa), see Winters, Roy L., Francis Lambert of Avignon (Philadelphia, 1938), pp. 66–70.Google Scholar

29. Müller, , Lambert, p. 43.Google Scholar

30. Richter, A. L., ed., Die evangelischen Kirchenordnungen des sechzehnten Jahrhunderts (Weimar, 1846), I, 56–69.Google Scholar

31. Maurer, W., “Franz Lambert von Avignon and das Verfassungsideal der Reformatio Ecclesiarum Hassiae von 1526,” Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte, 48, (1929), pp. 256–257,Google Scholar note 1, finds Lambert's ideas on church constitution relatively independent of his Franciscan and Lutheran presuppositions. He believed Lambert's synodal constitution as a whole to be rooted in the conciliar thought of the late middle ages, although some individual points may have come from practices in the Franciscan Order. It is interesting to note that Zwingli did not inaugurate the synod in Zürich until Easter, 1528, or about two years after Lambert wrote the “Reformatio.”

32. See Maurer, , “Reformatio,” p. 215Google Scholar, and Winters, Lambert, p. 93.Google Scholar

33 . Kurten, E., Franz Lambert von Avignon und Nikolaus Herborn (Münster, 1950), pp. 116–125.Google Scholar

34. See chapters XXII–XXIII in Richter, , Kirchenordnungen, p. 66.Google Scholar

35. Maurer, , “Reformatio,” p. 247.Google Scholar

36. See chapter XXIX in Richter, , Kirchenordnungen, p. 68.Google Scholar

37. Müller, , Lambert, p. 50.Google Scholar

38. Luther, Martin, Briefwechsel, Weimar Edition, IV (1883ff), 157–158.Google Scholar

39. See Küch, , “Einführung,” pp. 238–242Google Scholar for the dating`of the memoranda.

40. Urkundliche Quellen, II, no. 286, p. 198.Google Scholar

41. Ibid., no. 250, p. 167f.

42. Wappler, Paul, Die Stellung Kursachsens und des Landgrafen Philipp von Hessen zur Täuferbewegung (Münster, 1910), pp. 152–153.Google Scholar

43. Güther, Franz, ed., Urkundliche Quellen zur hessischen Beformationsgeschichte, IV: Wiedertäuferakteu, 1527–1626 (Marburg, 1951), no. 15, p. 38.Google Scholar