Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:19:14.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On The Origin Of Theses: An Exploration of Horace Bushnell's Rejection of Darwinism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Thomas Paul Thigpen
Thomas Paul Thigpen
Affiliation:
a doctoral candidate in historical theology inEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Horace Bushnell's children knew him as a tender, playful father whose after-dinner romps and continual courtesy warmed the memories of their early family life. But his daughter, Mary, once told of a curious and glaring exception to his habit of fun and kindness at home. “The sight of a doll or [toy] monkey was abhorrent to him,” she remembered, “and he could not restrain his expression of the disgust thus awakened…Woe to the doll which lay in his path!”

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , December 1988 , pp. 499 - 513
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cheney, Mary Bushnell, The Life and Letters of Horace Bushnell (New York, 1880), pp. 453–454.Google Scholar

2. Munger, Theodore T., Horace Bushnell: Preacher and Theologian (New York, 1899), pp. 212, 216, 323, 344;Google ScholarCherry, Conrad, “The Structure of Organic Thinking: Horace Bushnell's Approach to Language, Nature, and Nation,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 40 (1972): 19.Google Scholar

3. Wilkins, Walter J. II, “Science and Religious Thought: A Darwinism Case Study” (Ph.D. diss., Florida State University, 1985), pp. 273–277.Google Scholar

4. Bushnell, Horace, “Science and Religion,” Putnam's Magazine 1 (03. 1868): 267.Google Scholar

5. Ibid., p. 267.

6. Bushnell, Horace, “Progress,” Hours at Home 8 (01. 1869): 199.Google Scholar

7. “Science and Religion,” pp. 268–270.Google Scholar

8. Cheney, , Life and Letters, p. 536.Google Scholar

9. “Science and Religion,” p. 271.Google Scholar

10. Cherry, , “Structure of Organic Thinking,” p. 19.Google Scholar

11. “Progress,” p. 204.

12. Ibid., p. 199; Barrett, Paul H., ed., Metaphysics, Materialism, and the Evolution of Mind: Early Writings of Charles Darwin (Chicago, 1974), pp. 18–19, 35, xiii.Google Scholar

13. “Science and Religion,” p. 273.Google Scholar

14. Ibid., p. 274.

15. Darwin, Charles, On the Origin of Species (Cambridge, Mass, 1964), p.483Google Scholar (hereafter cited as OS).

16. Ibid., p. 484.

17. “Progress,” pp. 199–200.Google Scholar

18. This is the primary argument of “Progress.” See also OS, p. 489.

19. Eiseley, Loren, Darwin's Century: Evolution and the Men Who Discovered It (Garden City, N.Y., 1958), p. 240.Google Scholar

20. Mayr, Ernst, “Introduction,” OS, p. ix.Google Scholar

21. Ibid., pp. xix-xx.

22. Eiseley, , Darwin's Century, p. 24.Google Scholar

23. Ibid., pp. 24, 5–6, 43.

24. Agassiz, Louis, Contributions to the Natural History of the United States of America, vol. 3, sect. 5 (Boston, 1860), pp. 88–99.Google Scholar For a full treatment of Agassiz's response to Darwin, see Mayr, Ernst, “Agassiz, Darwin, and Evolution,” Harvard Library Bulletin 13 (1959); 165–194.Google Scholar

25. Bushnell, Horace, Nature and the Supernatural (New York, 1858), pp. 65–70, 193–198Google Scholar (hereafter cited as NS).

26. OS, pp. 463–464.

27. NS, pp. 66–72.

28. “Science and Religion,” p. 271.Google Scholar

29. Ibid., p. 271.

30. Ibid., p. 271.

31. Eiseley, , Darwin's Century, p. 24;Google ScholarSirSmith, James Edward, A Selection of the Correspondence of Linnaeus and Other Naturalists from the Original Manuscripts, vol. 2 (London, 1821), p. 460;Google Scholar as quoted in Eiseley, , Darwin's Century, p. 15.Google Scholar

32. “Progress,” p. 206.Google Scholar

33. NS, p. 243.Google Scholar

34. Bushnell, Horace, “Preliminary Dissertation on the Nature of Language as Related to Thought and Spirit,” in God in Christ (Hartford, Conn., 1849), p. 41.Google Scholar

35. Smith, H. Shelton, ed., Horace Bushnell (New York, 1965), p. 93.Google Scholar

36. God in Christ, p. 22.Google Scholar

37. Bushnell, Horace, “Revelation” (1839), in Horace Bushnell: Selected Writings on Language, Religion, and American Culture, ed. Smith, David L. (Chico, Calif., 1984), p. 30.Google Scholar

38. Smith, H. S., Horace Bushnell, p. 80.Google Scholar

39. Ibid., pp. 98–99.

40. Bushnell to his wife, 21 August 1871; quoted in Cheney, , Life and Letters, pp. 523–524.Google Scholar

41. Smith, D. L., Bushnell: Selected Writings, p. 63.Google Scholar

42. Bushnell to Rev. Dr. Bartol, 29 March 1872; as quoted in Cheney, , Life and Letters, p. 526.Google Scholar

43. Bushnell, Horace, “On the Mutabilities of Life,” in Moral Uses of Dark Things (New York, 1886), p. 320.Google Scholar

44. Ibid., pp. 328–333.

45. This is Cherry's primary thesis in “Structure of Organic Thinking.”

46. Mumford, Lewis, The Myth of the Machine, vol. 2, The Pentagon of Power (New York, 1964).Google Scholar

47. Cherry, , “Structure of Organic Thinking,” p. 18;Google ScholarMumford, , Pentagon of Power, p. 386.Google Scholar

48. Smith, D. L., Bushnell: Selected Writings, pp. 54, 108;Google Scholar“Science and Religion,” p. 272.Google Scholar

49. NS, p. 245; Smith, D. L., Bushnell: Selected Writings, p. 102;Google ScholarSmith, H. S., Horace Bushnell, pp. 95–96.Google Scholar

50. NS, p. 245.

51. Munger, , Horace Bushnell, p. 344.Google Scholar

52. Cherry, , “Structure of Organic Thinking,” p. 19.Google Scholar

53. Mayr, , “Introduction,” OS, p. xvi.Google Scholar

54. NS, pp. 24–25, 254; Cherry, Conrad, Nature and Religious Imagination: From Edwards to Bushnell (Philadelphia, 1980), pp. 162–169.Google Scholar

55. NS, pp. 25–26; “Progress,” p. 207.

56. Smith, D. L., Bushnell: Selected Writings, p. 117.Google Scholar

57. NS, pp. 60–61.

58. Cherry, , Nature and Religious Imagination, p. 167.Google Scholar

59. NS, pp. 259–260.

60. Smith, D. L., Bushnell: Selected Writings, p. 120.Google Scholar

61. Cherry, , “Structure of Organic Thinking,” p. 10.Google Scholar

62. Bushnell to his daughter, 5 January 1863; quoted in Cheney, , Life and Letters, p. 480.Google Scholar

63. NS, pp. 69–70.

64. Ibid., p. 245; “Progress,” pp. 201, 208.

65. NS, p. 69; Smith, D. L., Bushnell: Selected Writings, pp. 65–66;Google ScholarMayr, , “Introduction,” OS, p. xi;Google ScholarOS, chap. 10; Hull, David L., Darwin and His Critics: The Reception of Darwin's Theory of Evolution by the Scientific Community (Cambridge, Mass., 1973), pp. 430–431.Google Scholar

66. “Progress,” p. 205.

67. “Science and Religion,” p. 273.

68. Darwin, Charles, The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882, ed. Barlow, Nora (London, 1958), p. 139;Google Scholar quoted in Barrett, , Metaphysics, Materialism and the Evolution of Mind, p. 68.Google Scholar