No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
National Elements in the Career of St. Athanasius
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
It has been recognized for some time that nationalism is a factor to be reckoned with in the ecclesiastical history of the later Roman Empire. Certainly the history of the Monophysites after Chalcedon is largely the story of the struggle of Egyptian and Syrian national feeling against the Empire. In all probability the bishops of Alexandria who in the two generations before Chalcedon combatted the rise of the imperial church at Constantinople— Theophilus, Cyril, and Dioscorus—were supported by the patriotism of the Egyptian nation as well as by the pride of the Alexandrian see. But there has not yet been any answer to the question, when did this union of Christianity and nationalism in Egypt begin?
The discussion of this problem involves interrogating our sources on a subject they do not consciously treat and must be a matter of interpretation rather than merely of quotation of evidence. The problem could be stated in two ways; the church historian asks, when did Egyptian Christianity become nationalist? while for Egyptian history the problem is, when did Egyptian nationalism become Christian? The Egyptian nation, with its language, its religion, and some remnants of its literature and culture, had continued to exist through the whole period of Greco-Roman dominance. In the Coptic church it was to find once more the means to vigorous self-expression.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Church History 1933
References
1 Cf. Wigram, , The Separation of the MonophysitesGoogle Scholar and Maspero, Jean, Histoire des patriarches d'Alexandrie.Google Scholar
2 Cf. Woodward, , Christianity and Nationalism in the Later Roman Empire.Google Scholar
3 On the national character of Coptic Christianity, cf. Maspero, , op. cit.Google Scholar, chaps. 1–2.
4 Sozomen, , ii, 21–22Google Scholar; Socrates, , i, 27Google Scholar; the charges of violence on the part of Athanasius are partly confirmed by the Meletian papyri published by Bell, H. I., Jews and Christians at Alexandria;Google Scholar in Apologia contra Arianos, 59Google Scholar, Athanasius seems to condemn the Nicene clemency to the Meletians.
5 Festal Index, 6Google Scholar; Sozomen, , ii, 25Google Scholar; Bell, , op. cit.Google Scholar
6 Sozomen, , ii, 25Google Scholar; Socrates, , i, 28–32Google Scholar; Apol. c. Arianos, 59–85.Google Scholar
7 Sozomen, , ii, 28Google Scholar; Socrates, , i, 35Google Scholar; Apol. c. Arianos, 9, 86–87.Google Scholar
8 Apol. c. Arianos, 87, 7; Festal Index, 10–11Google Scholar; Sozomen, , iii, 5Google Scholar; Socrates, , ii, 8.Google Scholar
9 Apol. c. Arianos, 3, 18.Google Scholar
10 Sozomen, , iii, 5Google Scholar; Socrates, , ii, 9–10.Google Scholar
11 Epistola Encydica, 2–6Google Scholar; Sozomen, , iii, 6, 8.Google Scholar
12 Athanasius, , Historia Arianorum, 21.Google Scholar
13 Festal Index, 18Google Scholar; Apol. c. Arianos, 51–56.Google Scholar
14 Cf. signatures in Apol. c. Arianos, 50.Google Scholar
15 Athanasius, , Apologia ad Constantium, 9–10, 23Google Scholar; Festal Index, 22.Google Scholar
16 Athanasius, , Historia Arianorum, 31–46.Google Scholar
17 Apol. ad Constantium, 19.Google Scholar
18 Ibid., 2–22; Festal Index, 27.Google Scholar
19 Historia Arianorum, 81Google Scholar; Apologia ad Constantium, 22–26Google Scholar; Athanasius, , Apologia de Fuga, 24Google Scholar; Festal Index, 28Google Scholar; Historia Acephala, 4–5.Google Scholar
20 Apol. ad Constantium, 27.Google Scholar
21 Ibid., 28–35; Festal Index, 29–32Google Scholar; Historia Acephala, 6.Google Scholar
22 Festal Index, 33–34Google Scholar; Historia Acephala, 10.Google Scholar
23 Julian, , Epistles, 26, 6, 51Google Scholar; Historia Acephala, 11.Google Scholar
24 Festal Index, 35–36Google Scholar; Historia Acephala, 12–13.Google Scholar
23 Festal Index, 37Google Scholar; Historia Acephala, 15–16.Google Scholar
26 Cf. the tone of Constantius' letters, Apol. ad Const., 30–31Google Scholar, and of Philostorgius, iii, 12.
27 Epistola Encyclica, 3–5.Google Scholar
28 Athanasius, , Ad Episcopos Aegypti, 22.Google Scholar
29 Hist. Arianorum, 54, and references in note 19, above.Google Scholar
30 Historia Acephala, 8.Google Scholar
31 Julian, , Epistles, 51.Google Scholar
32 Historia Acephala, 15.Google Scholar
33 Festal Index, 39Google Scholar; Historia Acephala, 18.Google Scholar
34 Sozomen, , iii, 6Google Scholar; Socrates, , ii, 11Google Scholar. Athanasius writing at the time, mentions no such incident (Epistola Encyclica, 5).Google Scholar
35 Sozomen, , v, 6.Google Scholar
36 Socrates, , iv, 13.Google Scholar
37 Vita Pachomii, in Acta Sanctorum, Maii, iii, 1680, pp. 22*–44*; chap. 88.Google Scholar
38 Socrates, , iii, 14Google Scholar; Theodoret, , iii, 5.Google Scholar
39 Festal Index, 35Google Scholar; Historia Acephala, 13.Google Scholar
40 Letter of Ammon, in Acta Sanctorum, Maii, iii, pp. 54*–61*; chap. 23.Google Scholar
41 Philagrius before the second exile (Hist. Arianorum, 9Google Scholar), Syriarius before the third; so Narses under Justinian, Cyrus under Heraclius.
42 On the later history, cf. Maspero, , Histoire des patriarchsGoogle Scholar, and Butler, A. J., The Arab Conquest of Egypt.Google Scholar
43 e. g., Tyre, Apol. c. Arianos, 71, 77–79Google Scholar; Sardica, Ibid., 50.
44 Apol. ad Constantium, 27–28Google Scholar; Hist. Arianorum, 71–73.Google Scholar
45 Cf. Athanasius' letter to Dracontius (Epistle, 49Google Scholar) urging him to accept the episcopate.
46 Festal Letters, 11 and 19.Google Scholar
47 For actions see note 4 above; for language cf. Apol. c. Arianos, 59Google Scholar, Hist. Arianorum, 78.Google Scholar
48 Evidence as to the organization and Coptic character of the Meletians in Bell, , op. cit.Google Scholar
49 Festal Index, 2–6.Google Scholar
50 Apol. c. Arianos, 6.Google Scholar
51 Athanasius, , Vita Antonii, 67–71Google Scholar; Festal Index, 10.Google Scholar
52 Vita, Pachomii, 20, 70, 73, 77, 92; 96.Google Scholar
53 Ibid., 73, 88, 92; Letter of Ammon, 23.
54 Cf. examples in Epistle, 49Google Scholar, to Dracontius.
55 Epistles, 52–53 and 48.Google Scholar
56 Note the national feeling expressed in Histor. Arianorum, 78Google Scholar—Egypt has been the most orthodox country.