Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:59:50.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Motives in Protestant Missions, 1890–1917*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2011

Paul A. Varg
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University

Extract

In terms of the number of missionaries, financial contributions, and amount of home front propaganda, the missionary movement reached its peak in the United States in the years from 1890 to 1917. Only during this period did the foreign missions of the Protestant churches enjoy sufficient popular support to warrant use of the term “crusade.”

This raises the question as to why Christian missions should have had such a strong appeal to the generation which elected Theodore Roosevelt to the presidency, embarked on a crusade to liberate the Cubans, and later sent its sons to Europe allegedly to defend the moral principles of democracy. Nothing could have been more quixotic than the slogan adopted by the Student Volunteers: “The Evangelization of the World in this Generation.” This motto expressed the vision of the thousands of college and seminary students who joined the Student Volunteers. It was also the goal of the hosts of women's missionary societies and the Laymen's Movement, the organization which marshaled the support of more than 100,000 men in the churches in behalf of foreign missions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Eddy, Sherwood, Pathfinders of the World Missionary Crusade (New York: Abingdon-Cokesbury Press, 1945), p. 50.Google Scholar

2. Beahm, William M., Factors in the Development of the Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions (Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Divinity School University of Chicago, 1941), p. 16.Google Scholar

3. Students and the Present Missionary Crisis. Addresses Delivered Before the Sixth International Convention of the Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions, Rochester, New York, December 29, 1909, to January 2, 1910 (New Tork: Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions, 1910), p. 197. Hereafter cited as Meport of the Student Volunteer Convention of 1910.

4. Students and the Modem Missionary Crusade: Addresses Delivered Before the Fifth International Convention of the Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions (New York: Student Volunteer Movement, 1906), p. 15. Hereafter cited as Meport of the Student Volunteer Convention of 1906.

5. Ibid., p. 29.

6. Report of the Student Volunteer Convention of 1910, p. 507.

7. Speer, Robert E., Missionary Principles and Practice. A Discussion of Christian Missions and of Some Criticisms upon Them (New York: Fleming H. Reveil Company, 1902), p. 19.Google Scholar

8. The Student Missionary Appeal. Addresses at the Third International Convention of the Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions (New York: Student Volunteer Movement, 1898), p. 151.

9. The Student Missionary Enterprise. Addresses and Discussions of the Second International Convention of the Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions (New York: Fleming H. Reveil Co., 1894), p. 48.

10. Abbott, Lyman, Reminiscences (Boston: Houghton Mimin Co., 1915), p. 477.Google Scholar For a discussion of this controversy see Swift, David, “Conservative Versus Progressive Orthodoxy in Latter 19 th Century Congregationalism,” Church History, XVI, March, 1947, pp. 2231.Google Scholar

11. Carver, William Owen, Missions and Modern Thought (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1910), pp. 1314.Google Scholar

12. World Missionary Conference, 1910. Report of Commission VI. The Some Base of Missions (New York: Fleming H. Reveil Company, 1910), pp. 133–134.

13. Speer, Robert E., Christianity and the Nations (New York: Fleming H. Reveil Company, 1910), p. 33.Google Scholar

14. Carver, , op. cit., p. 14.Google Scholar

15. Senate Document, 2nd Session, 35th. Congress, p. 1208.

16. The Life and Letters of Samuel Wells Williams, ed. Frederick Wells Williams (New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1889), p. 257.

17. Abbott, Lyman, The Rights of Man, A Study in Twentieth Century Problems (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company, 1901), p. 273.Google Scholar

18. Denby, Charles, “The Influence of Mission Work on Commerce,” The Independent, December 12, 1901, p. 2960.Google Scholar

19. Hamm, Margherita Arlina, “The Secular Value of Foreign Missions,” The Independent, April 26, 1900, p. 1001.Google Scholar

20. Clark, Francis E., “Do Foreign Missions Pay?The North American Review, March, 1898, p. 280.Google Scholar

21. Roosevelt, Theodore, ‘The Awakening of China,” The Outlooh, November 28, 1908, p. 666.Google Scholar

22. Holcombe, Chester, “The Missionary Enterprise in China,” Atlantic Monthly, September, 1906, p. 354.Google Scholar

23. Bond, George J., Our Share in China and What We Are Doing with It (Toronto: The Missionary Society of the Methodist Church, 1909), p. 62.Google Scholar

24. Preston Maxwell, J., “How Best to Obtain and Conserve Results in the Evangelistic Work amongst Hospital Patients,” The Chinese Recorder, May, 1913, p. 283.Google Scholar

25. Dennis, James S., Christian Missions and Social Progress. A Sociological Study of Foreign Missions (New York: Fleming H. Revell Company).Google Scholar

26. Speer, Robert E., Christianity and the Nations (New York: Fleming H. Eevell Company, 1910), p. 29.Google Scholar

27. Mott, John B., “What of the War?” The Student Missionary Appeal Addresses at the Third International Convention of the Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions (Cleveland, 1898), p. 274.Google Scholar

28. Smith, Arthur H., Village Life in, China A Study in Sociology (New York: Fleming H. Reveil Company, 1899), pp. 342345.Google Scholar

29. Bashford, J. W., God's Missionary Plan for the World (New York: Eaton and Mains, 1907), pp. 4445.Google Scholar

30. Barton, James L., “The Modern Missionary,” Harvard Theological Review, January, 1915, p. 6.Google Scholar

31. Speer wrote: “The West and Western nations, which owe all their good to Christianity, are under a heavy debt to the rest of the world, whieh it is not the function of the Christian chureh to discharge. It is the function of the Christian Church to inspire the Christian nations to do justice and to give help to the non-Christian nations, but there are many great and truly Christian services with whieh the foreign missionary enterprise is not charged. They are to be rendered through other forms of international relationship.” Christianity and the Nations, p. 57.

32. Wright, H. K., “The Social Message and Christian Missions,” The Chinese Recorder, March, 1912, pp. 147155.Google Scholar

33. Ross, Edward Alsworth, The Changing Chinese. The Conflict of Oriental and Western Cultures in China (New York: The Century Company, 1911), p. 245.Google Scholar

34. Giddings, Franklin Henry, The Principles of Sociology (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1928), p. 360.Google Scholar

35. Earl Taylor, S. and Luccoek, Halford E., The Christian Crusade for World Democracy (New York: The Methodist Book Concern, 1918), p. 64.Google Scholar

36. Broomhall, Marshall, Present Day Conditions in China (New York: Fleming H. Reveil Company, 1908), pp. 12.Google Scholar

37. Mott, John R., The Decisive Hour of Christian Missions (New York: The Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions, 1911), p. 34.Google Scholar

38. Bond, George J., Our Share in China and What We Are Doing with It, p. 27.Google Scholar

39. Fowler, Charles Henry, Missionary Addresses (Cincinnati: Jennings and Graham, 1906), pp. 4445.Google Scholar

40. Mahan, Alfred T., “Effects of Asiatic Conditions Upon International Policies,” North American Review, November, 1900, p. 615.Google Scholar

41. Roosevelt, Theodore, “The Awakening of China,” The Outlook, November 28, 1908, p. 666.Google Scholar

42. Rankin, Henry William, “Political Values of the American Missionary,” The American Journal of Sociology, XIII, Sept. 1907, p. 172.Google Scholar