No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Influence of the Puritan Clergy on the House of Commons: 1625–1629
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
As is well known, Puritanism, as well as social, economic, and constitutional issues, were involved in the struggle against the Crown in the reigns of the first two Stuarts. Like the other groups which comprised the opposition—the lawyers, the merchants, and the country gentry—the Puritans came to focus their attention on Parliament as the agency for the articulation of their grievances against the policy of the government. But unlike the other groups, the ties which bound the Puritans to Parliament were somewhat weak, and to a certain extent indirect. In the first place, the primary concern of the Puritans was with religious reformation, and it was only after they had been repulsed by the Crown and disowned by Convocation that they came to regard Parliament as the only avenue of protest against the conservative Anglicanism of James and the more extreme high church propensities of his son. Moreover, it was impossible for the natural leaders of the religiously disaffected—the Puritan preachers—to champion their cause in Parliament, since the lower clergy had been excluded from that assembly after the fourteenth century on the grounds that they were represented in Convocation.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Church History 1945
References
1 Great Britain, The Journal of the House of Commons (hereafter cited as Commons Journal), I, 118–119.Google Scholar
2 Ibid., 671, 715–716, 675, 722.
3 Ibid., 799; Gardiner, Samuel Rawson (ed.), Debates in the House of Commons in 1625 (“Publications of the Camden Society,” New Series, [Westminster, 1873]) VI, 6.Google Scholar
4 Commons Journal, I, 463Google Scholar; McClure, Norman Egbert (ed.), The Letters of John Chamberlain (Philadelphia, 1939), I, 525.Google Scholar
5 Commons Journal, I, 799Google Scholar; Gardiner, , Debates, 6.Google Scholar
6 Roberts, George (ed.), Diary of Walter Yonge, Esq. Justice of the Peace, and M. P. for Honiton, written at Colyton and Axminster, Co. Devon, from 1604 to 1628 (“Publications of the Camden Society,” [London, 1848]) XLI, 85–86.Google Scholar
7 Commons Journal, I, 799, 800Google Scholar; Gardiner, , Debates, 6, 29Google Scholar. That Holdsworth preached is a little uncertain since the Journal reads “Oldsworth,” but in 1640 a similar spelling undoubtedly meant Holdsworth.
8 Commons Journal, I, 875, 878Google Scholar.
9 Commons Journal, I, 883.Google Scholar
10 [Hyde], Edward, Earl of Clarendon, The History of the Rebellion and Civil Wars in England, to which is now added an Historical View of the Affairs of Ireland (Oxford, 1826), II, 25.Google Scholar
11 During the ejections of the period 1640–1660, John Fitzgeffery, a cleric of Anglican sympathies, was removed from the living of St. Dominick's parish, Cornwall (Coate, Mary, Cornwall in the great Civil War and Interregnum 1642–1660 [Oxford, 1933], 383)Google Scholar. An Alexander Fitzgeoffrey displayed Puritanical inclinations during the reign of Elizabeth (Rowse, A. L., Tudor Cornwall [London, 1941], 355)Google Scholar. It is interesting to note, moreover, that the minister-poet, Charles Fitzgeifrey, was Cornish.
12 Commons Journal, I, 927Google Scholar; Notestein, Wallace and Relf, Frances Helen (eds.), Commons Debates for 1629 critically edited and an Introduction dealing with Parliamentary Sources for the early Stuarts (Minneapolis, 1921), 42, 129, 83.Google Scholar
13 Dyke, Jeremiah, A sermon preached at tle publicke fast to the commons house of parliament April. 5th. 1628 (London, 1628), 27.Google Scholar
14 Preston, John, A sermon preached at a generall fast before the commons-house of parliament: the second of July, 1625 (London, 1633)Google Scholar, appended to Preston, John, The saiats qualification (London, 1634), 271–274.Google Scholar
15 Dyke, , A sermon, 22.Google Scholar
16 Ibid., 9.
17 Ibid., 10–12, 23.
18 Ibid., 17–21, 24–25.
19 Ibid., 20–21, 25.
20 Preston, , A sermon, 286.Google Scholar
21 Dyke, , A sermon, 38–42.Google Scholar
22 Ibid., 38.
23 Preston, , A sermon, 297.Google Scholar
24 Dyke, , A sermon, 42–43.Google Scholar
25 Preston, , A sermon, 295, 297.Google Scholar
26 Dyke, , A sermon, 42–43, 46–47.Google Scholar
27 Ibid., 44.
28 Preston, , A sermon, 299Google Scholar. This may refer to Roman Catholicism rather than to high ehurch Anglicanism, though both parties were obnoxious to the Puritans.
29 Ibid., 298–299.
30 Dyke, , A sermon, 35.Google Scholar
31 Ibid., 37.
32 Preston, , A sermon, 285.Google Scholar
33 Dyke, , A sermon, 35.Google Scholar
34 Preston, , A sermon, 294.Google Scholar
35 Ibid., 261. “Indeed wee care for the favour of Princes, and think that they can hurt us, or doe us good; and therefore wee are so intent about them, so busily occupied about them, but this would not worke on us so much if wee did beleeve…. that God oney is the Author of good and evill.”
36 Ibid., 299–300.
37 Dyke, , A sermon, 47–49.Google Scholar
38 Ibid., 49.
39 In a similar spirit, the Commons in 1625 reeolved to forego their customary oon sideration of grievances (Commons Journal, I, 800Google Scholar; Gardiner, , Debates, 9–12).Google Scholar
40 Cf. Burges, Cornelius, A sermon preached t the honourable house of commons assembled in parliament, at their pvbliqve fast, Novem. 17. 1640 (London, 1641)Google Scholar; Marshall, Stephen, A sermon preached before the honourable house of commons, now assembled in parliament, at their publike fast, November 17. 1640 (London, 1641).Google Scholar
41 Rushworth, John (ed.), Historical collections (London, 1721), I, 651Google Scholar; Notestein, and Relf, , Commons Debates, 28–29.Google Scholar
42 Coke and Pym were, of course prominent hi the affairs of the inns, while all four men received part of their education there.
43 The records of the honorable soctety of Lincoln's Inn. The black books (London, 1898), II, 234–235Google Scholar; Archbold, William Arthur Jobson, “Edward Reynolds,” The Dictionary of National Biography. XVI, 926–927.Google Scholar
44 The records of the honorable society of Lincoln's Inn, II, 277–278.Google Scholar
45 Fletcher, Reginald J. (ed.), The Pension Book of Gray's Inn (Records of the honourable society) 1569–1669 (London, 1901), 224.Google Scholar
46 Ball, Thomas, “The life of Doctor Preston,” in Clarke, Samuel, A generall martyrologie, containing a collection of all the greatest persecutions which have befallen the church of Christ from the creation to our present times (London, 1651), 494.Google Scholar
47 The records of the honorable society of Lincoln's Inn, II, 304 note.Google Scholar
48 Elrington, Charles Richard (ed.), The Whole Works of the Most Rev. James Ussher, D. D., Lord Archbishop of Armagh, and Primate of all Ireland (Dublin, 1864), XVI, 440–441.Google Scholar
49 Grossart, Alexander Balloch (ed.), The Complete Works of Richard Sibbes, D.D., Master of Catherine Hall, Cambridge; Preacher of Cray's Inn, London (Edinburgh, 1862), I, 376–383.Google Scholar
50 Preston, John, A sermon preached at Lincolnes-Inne on Gen. xxij.xiv. (London, 1635), 23.Google Scholar
51 Ball, “Doctor Preston,” 502.
52 Preston, , A sermon preached at a generall fast, 287.Google Scholar
53 One insight into Puritan practice may be provided in the Historical Manuscripts Commission Reports, where among the calendared papers of SirHarley, Robert, a Puritan member, is found the bare notation of “a list of petitions to be made on a day of humiliation” (Histtrical Manuscripts Commission, Report 14, appendix, part 2. The manuscripts of his grace, the duke of Portland, preserved at Welbeck Abbey, III [London, 1894], 23)Google Scholar. If indeed a number of Puritan petitions were presented to the House on the fast day, it speaks much for Puritan shrewdness in choosing the right psychological moment to approach the Conimons with their demands. There is some reason to think, however, that the list was merely a program of Sir Robert's personal devotions.
54 Commons Journal, I, 788.Google Scholar
55 Commons Journal, I, 802, 805–806, 807, 809–810, 811, 812Google Scholar; Gardiner, , Debates, 26, 33–35, 46–53, 61–63, 69–71.Google Scholar
56 Commons Journal, I, 851, 871, 911Google Scholar; see also Gardiner, , Debates, 179–186.Google Scholar
57 Commos Jovrnal, I, 926.Google Scholar
58 Notestein, and Relf, , Commons Debates, 59.Google Scholar
59 Ball, “Doctor Preston,” 504.
60 Elrington, , The Whole Works of… James Ussher, XVI, 395.Google Scholar
61 Ibid., XV, XVI, passim.
62 For treatments of the feoffees scheme, see Kirby, Ethyn W., “The Lay Feoffees: a Study in Militant Puritanism,” The Journal of Modern History, XIV (1942), 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Parker, Henry A., “The Feoffees of Impropriations,” Publications of the Colonial Society of Massachusetts: Transactions (1906–1907), XI, 263–277.Google Scholar
63 Historical Manuscripts Commission, 22.
64 Ibid., 23.
65 Ibid., 25.
66 Ball, “Doctor Preston,” 511.
67 Ibid., 514.
68 Ibid.