Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Though one of the most Protestant nations (approximately 96 percent belong to the state Lutheran church), Norway seemingly had neither cause nor opportunity to write the history of her Reformation. For her the modern writing of history began only in the early nineteenth century, triggered by the nationalism of the Napoleonic era and the July Revolution of 1830. Lacking the Reformation era's religious polemicism, Norway produced no church historians, such as those in other countries who helped found modern historiography in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. There was not even a printing press in Norway until 1643. But in 1811 Norway's first university, the present University of Oslo, was founded and soon became a center for historical research and writing. Far more important, on May 17, 1814, Norwegian representatives signed their constitution, making their land a constitutional monarchy. Precipitated by the 1814 Treaty of Kiel, which tore Norway from over four centuries of royal union with Denmark, a Napoleonic “loser,” and forced her into another ninety–year royal union with victorious Sweden, this constitution, as the only one from the revolutionary era to survive the Metternichian system, became the symbol of one of the most fervent and long-lasting displays of nationalism in modern times. This nationalism is the most important key toward understanding the writing Norwegian historians have done, or not done, about their Reformation.
1. The best account in English of these events can be found in Larsen, Karen, A History of Norway (Princeton, 1948).Google Scholar
2. Wisløff, Carl Fr., Norsk Kirkehistorie, 3 vols. (Oslo, 1966), 1.Google Scholar
3. Quoted by Seip, Diderik A., “Ved Universitetets fest for reformasjonens inførelse i Norge,” Norsk Teologisk Tidsskrift 38 (1937): 275–276.Google Scholar
4. Aslakson, Kort, Theologiske og historiske beskriffuelse om den Reformerede Religion (Copenhagen, 1622), p. 57.Google Scholar
5. Dietrichson, Jacob F., De Reformatione Ecclesiae Norwegicae (Christiania, 1837), pp. 3, 13.Google Scholar
6. Stenersen, Stener, Den christne kirkes Historie i Udtog, 2 vols. (Christiania, 1823), 2:133.Google Scholar
7. Keyser, Jacob Rudolf, Den norske Kirkes Historie under Katholicismen, 2 vols. (Christiania, 1868), 2:830–831, 818, 839.Google Scholar
8. Munch, Peter Andreas, Norges, Sveriges, og Danmarks Historie til Skolebrug (Christiania, 1838), pp. 487, 218–219.Google Scholar
9. Koht, Halvdan, På leit etter liner i historia (Oslo, 1953), p. 23,Google Scholar quoted in Smith, Leslie F., Modern Norwegian Historiography (Oslo, 1962), p. 16.Google Scholar
10. Wergeland, Håkon, Kyrkjesoge for Laererskulane, 5th ed., 2 vols. (Oslo, 1961), 2:22–24, 81;Google ScholarEriksen, Magnus, Større Kirkehistorie, Håndbok for laerere, 3rd ed. (Oslo, 1963), pp. 167–169.Google Scholar
11. Koht, Halvdan, “Historieskriving og folkevokster,” Norsk historisk videnskab i femti år 1869–1919 (Christiania, 1920), p. 8;Google ScholarWorm-Müller, Jacob, “Ernst Sars,” in Trin i norsk historieforskning (Oslo, 1935), p. 29.Google Scholar
12. Sars, Johan Ernst Weihaven, Samlede Vaerker, 3 vols. (Christiania, 1912), 2:272, 450; 3:117–118, 123–124.Google Scholar
13. Nielsen, Yngvar, Norges Historie (10 vol. cooperative work) vol. 4,Google Scholar part 1, Tidsrummet 1537–1588 (Christiania, 1909), pp. 28–30, 35, 235, 227–230;Google Scholar see his “Foranstaltning” in Jens Nilssøn, Visitatsböger og Reiseoptegnelser 1574–1597 (Christiania, 1885).Google Scholar
14. Brandrud, Andreas, “A. Chr. Bang: Den Norske Kirkes historie,” Nork Teologisk Tidsskrift 15 (1914): 369–371;Google ScholarBull, Edvard, “Norsk historisk forskning 1869–1919,” Norsk historisk uidenskab i femti år 1869–1919 (Christiania, 1920), pp. 117, 84.Google Scholar
15. Bang, Anton Christian, Den norske Kirkes Historie (Christiania, 1912), pp. 323–324.Google Scholar
16. Bang, Anton Christian, Udsigt over den norske kirkes historie efter Reformationen (Christiania, 1883), p. 24;Google Scholaridem, Den norske kirkes historie i Reformations-Aarhundredet (Christiania, 1895), pp. 98, 140, 113, 85, 195, 201, 236–241; idem, Den norske Kirkes Historie (Christiania, 1912), pp. 334, 336.
17. John E. Quam, who has written an unpublished doctoral dissertation on Bishop Jørgen Eriksson, thus characterizes Bang's approach in a letter to this writer June 14, 1967. See also Bang, Anton Christian, Den Norske Kirkes Geistlighed i Reformations-Aarhundredet (Christiania, 1897).Google Scholar
18. Bang, , Historie i Reformations-Aarhundredet, pp. 5–15, 420, 19;Google Scholaridem, “Peder Palladius: Katechismusudleggelse for de norske Prester,” Theologisk Tidsskrift, 3d series, 1 (1887): 217.
19. Bang, , Historie i Reformations-Aarhundredet, pp. 54–56, 356–357, 214, 369–371, 386–387;Google Scholaridem, “Gjengangere fra Hedenskabet og Katholicismen blandt vort Folk efter Reformationen,” Theologisk Tidsskrift, 2d series, 1 (1885): 166.
20. Seierstad, Andreas, “Då reformasjonen kom til Noreg,” in Vår lutherske aru. Et festskrift (Oslo, 1937), pp. 32–33;Google Scholaridem, “Den norske reformasjons struktur,” Tidsskrift for teologi og kirke 8 (1937): 199–203; idem, “Den norske reformasjons resultat,” Tidsskrift for teologi og kirke 9 (1938): 31–32, 36, 33.
21. Wisløff, , Norsk Kirkehistorie, pp. 407, 454–455.Google Scholar