Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T01:50:07.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

French Catholic Demonologists and Their Enemies in the Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Jonathan L. Pearl
Affiliation:
Mr. Pearl is associate professor of history in the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Extract

Since the eighteenth century, critics and historians have looked with embarrassment and horror at the belief in and persecution of witches in France, as well as in the rest of Europe, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The witchcraft crisis has seemed to be either an example of the evils of traditional religious bigotry or an odd aberration in the march of progress following the Renaissance. Those who defined and propagated the learned theories of witchcraft—its reality and dangers and the need for severe persecution of witches—have been depicted almost universally as oppressive, bigoted extremists. In recent years historians have dealt with witchcraft from new points of view and have provided valuable new information and interpretations, but they still have tended to confirm the traditional images of the writers of demonological tracts. They are horrified and repulsed by the demonologists, whom they see as spokesmen for a unified oppressive upper class.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Trever-Roper, Hugh R., “The European Witch-Craze of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries,” in Religion, the Reformation, and Social Change (London, 1972);Google Scholar Mandrou, Robert, Magistrats et sorcièrs en France an XVIf siecle (Paris, 1968), p. 136;Google Scholar Muchembled, Robert, La Culture populaire ella culture des elites (Paris, 1978), p. 300;Google Scholar idem, La Sorcèire au village (Paris, 1979), p. 77. All translations from French are my own.

2. Clark, Stuart, “Inversion, Misrule, and the Meaning of Witchcraft,” Past and Present 87 (1980): 98127,CrossRefGoogle Scholar makes valuable suggestions about the language of demonology.

3. Deyon, Pierre, Amiens Capitale Provinciale (Paris, 1967), pp. 396397.Google Scholar

4. Crespet, Pierre, Deux liures de Ia hayne de Sathan et matins esprits con tre l'homme (Paris, 1590)Google Scholar, fols. 194v, 233r.

5. Loyer, Pierre Ie, III Livres des spectres (Angers, 1586), p. 526;Google Scholar Maldonat, R. P., Traicte des anges et demons, trans. Boric, Francois de la (Paris, 1605), p. 178.Google Scholar

6. See Pearl, Jonathan L., “Humanism and Satanism: Jean Bodin's Contribution to the Witchcraft Crisis,” The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 19 (1982): 541548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. de Nynauld, J., De la lycanthropie, transformation, et extase des sorciers (Paris, 1615), pp. 4, 21, 74.Google Scholar

8. Benedicti, Jean, La triomphante victo ire de Ia Vierge Marie, sur sept maims esprits (Lyon, 1611), pp. 9, 69;Google Scholar Birette, Sanson, Refutation de l'erreurdu vulgaire touchant les responses des diables exorcizez (Rouen, 1618);Google Scholar Pithoys, Claude, La Descouverture des faux possedez (Chalons, 1621)Google Scholar, in Whitmore, P. J. S., ed., A Seventeenth-Century Exposure of Superstition: Selected Texts of Claude Fithoys (1587–1676,) (The Hague, 1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9. Michaelis, Sebastien, Discours des esprits (Lyon, 1614), p. 104;Google Scholar Valderama, R. P., Histoire generale du monde, trans. Richardier, Sieur de la (Paris, 1619), p. 311.Google Scholar

10. Lancre, Pierre de, L'incredulitè et mescreance du sortilege plainement convaincue (Paris, 1622), pp. 710, 366.Google Scholar

11. DuPont, R., La Philosophie des esprits (Paris, 1622)Google Scholar, fol. 7r; Garasse, Francois, La Doctrine curieuse des beaux esprits de ce temps (Paris, 1623), p. 37;Google Scholar idem, La Somme theologique des veritz capitales de la religion Chrestienne (Paris, 1625), p. 61; Valderama, Histoire, pp. 180, 13, 18.

12. Garasse, , Somme Theologique, pp. 1415.Google Scholar

13. Rebreviettes, G. de, L'impieté combatue par des infideles (Paris, 1612), pp. 29, 411412;Google Scholar L'Estoile, Pierre de, Journal de L'Estoile, ed. Armand, Brette (Paris, 1906).Google Scholar For the concerns of educational reformers, see Chartier, R., Compere, M.-M., and Julia, D., L'Education en la France du XVI' an XVIII' sthcle (Paris, 1976).Google Scholar

14. Richeome, Louis, L'immortalit de l'ame (Paris, 1621), p. 84,Google Scholar intro.; Garasse, , Doctrine curzeuse, pp. 843, 847.Google Scholar

15. Church courts had very narrow jurisdiction in this period. In general, they only heard cases in which clerics were charged with heresy, blasphemy, or witchcraft. Even in these matters, charges often were referred to lay courts. See Dewald, Jonathan, The Formation of a Provincial Mobility: The Magistrates of the Parlement of Rouen, 1499–1610 (Princeton, 1980), p. 313.Google Scholar

16. See, for example, Mandrou, Magistrats et sorcièrs.

17. Loyer, Le, IIII Livres, p. 526;Google Scholar Crespet, Deux livres, fol. 42r.

18. Lancre, Pierre de, Tableau de 1'inconstance des mauvais anges et demons (Paris, 1612)Google Scholar, intro.; idem, L'Incredulité; pp. 353, 363, 601, 609.

19. Soman, Albert, “Les Proces de sorcellerie au Parlement de Paris (1565–1640),” Annales 32 (1977): 794796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20. Chauvincourt, Sieur de Beauvoys de, Discourse de la lycanthropie (Paris, 1599), p. 19.Google Scholar

21. Mandrou, , Magistrats et sorcièrs, pp. 183, 343, 345;Google Scholar Soman, , “Proces de sorcellerie,” p.795.Google Scholar Henningsen, Gustav, The Wdches'Adoocate: Basque Witchcraft and the Spanish Inquisition (1609–1614) (Reno, Nev., 1980)Google Scholar, demonstrates the important role that judges' attitudes played in witchcraft cases. When the inquisitors were believers, hundreds of cases were unearthed; but when they were not, people revoked their confessions, and witchcraft seemed virtually to disappear.