Article contents
Context and Meaning: Roman Catholic Devotion to the Blessed Sacrament in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
A French visitor to a nineteenth-century Irish Catholic parish in the United States described the scene as follows: Behold them, when the sanctuary bell announces the moment of consecration; they raise their hands, they extend their arms in the form of a cross, they pray and sigh aloud; at times some leave their pew and prostrate themselves in the aisle, in order to assume a more suppliant and adoring attitude. … If you wait until the end of mass, you will be further edified. You will see them approach as near as possible to the high altar, before which they bow profoundly, making several genuflections, and frequently remain for a moment almost prostrate to the ground. From here they go to kneel at the altar of the Blessed Virgin, then before that of St. Joseph. Then follows a last and touching station before the body of the dead Christ which the Italians call the pietá; they pray here for a few moments, and respectfully press their lips to the five wounds of the Saviour. At the door of the church they take holy water, sign themselves with it repeatedly, and sprinkle their faces with it; then turning to the tabernacle they make a last genuflection, as if to bid farewell to our Lord, and finally withdraw.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Church History 1985
References
1. Irish Faith in America: Recollections of a Missionary, trans. Ella McMahon (New York, [1881]), pp. 35–36.Google Scholar
2. Taves, Ann, “Relocating the Sacred: Roman Catholic Devotions in Mid-Nineteenth- Century America” (Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago, 1983), pp. 5–82.Google Scholar
3. Liguori, Alphonsus, The Mission Book of the Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer (Baltimore, 1862; reprint ed., New York, 1978), pp. 30–31.Google Scholar For similar instructions, see The Ursuline Manual (New York, 1857), pp. 118–119;Google Scholar for examples of “devotions at Mass,” see St. Vincent's Manual (Baltimore, 1854), pp. 106–128,Google Scholar and The Key of Heaven; or, A Manual of Prayer (New York, 1873), pp. 134–207.Google Scholar
4. Callahan, Nelson J., ed. The Diary of Richard Burtsell, Priest of New York: The Early Years, 1865–1868 (New York, 1978), pp. 337–338.Google Scholar
5. The New Catholic Encyclopedia, s.v. “Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament,” by Burbach, M. (Washington, D.C., 1967), 2:303–304.Google Scholar
6. Dehne, Carl, “Roman Catholic Popular Devotions,” Worship 49 (1975): 451,Google Scholar and Garraghan, Gilbert J., The Jesuits of the Middle United States, 3 vols. (New York, 1938), 2:96–97.Google Scholar
7. Guilday, Peter, A History of the Councils of Baltimore, 1791–1884 (New York, 1932), pp. 210, 256, 263–264.Google Scholar
8. Curley, Michael J., Venerable John Neumann, C.S.S.R., Fourth Bishop of Philadelphia (Washington, D.C., 1952), pp. 219–220.Google Scholar
9. Liguori, , Mission Book, p. 401;Google ScholarDiary of Richard Burtsell, p. 54; and Spalding, Thomas W., Martin John Spalding: American Churchman (Washington, D.C., 1973), p. 191.Google Scholar
10. Spalding, Martin John Spalding, p. 191.
11. Grimm, Eugene, ed., Complete Ascetical Works of St. Alphonsus Liguori, vol. 6, The Holy Eucharist, 3d ed. (Brooklyn, 1934), p. 123.Google Scholar
12. The Catholic Encyclopedia, s.v. “Heart of Jesus, Devotion to,” by Bainvel, Jean (New York, 1907), 7:166–167Google Scholar (hereafter cited as CE); and Guibert, Joseph de, The Jesuits: Their Spiritual Doctrine and Practice, A Historical Study ed. Ganss, George E., trans. William J. Young, (Chicago, 1964), p. 398.Google Scholar
13. Brun, Jacques Le, “Politics and Spirituality: The Devotion to the Sacred Heart,” trans. Griffith, J., in The Concrete Christian Life, ed. Christian Duquoc (New York, 1971), pp. 38–39.Google Scholar
14. CE, s.v. “Visits to the Blessed Sacrament,” by Herbert Thurston, 15:483–484.
15. Faber, Frederick William, Growth in Holiness: or, The Progress of the Spiritual Life (Baltimore, n.d.), p. 274.Google Scholar For background on Faber, see Taves, pp. 87–88.
16. Taves, , “Relocating the Sacred,” pp. 212–213.Google Scholar
17. Holmes, Derek, The Triumph of the Holy See; A Short History of the Papacy in the Nineteenth Century (Shepherdstown, W.V., 1978), p. 135.Google Scholar
18. Taves, , “Relocating the Sacred,” pp. 222–223.Google Scholar
19. For background on the group, see Curran, Robert Emmett, “Prelude to ‘Americanism’: The New York Accademia and Clerical Radicalism in the Late Nineteenth Century,” Church History 47 (1978):48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Kirk, Martin, “The Spirituality of Isaac Thomas Hecker Reconciling the American Character and the Catholic Faith” (Ph.D diss., Saint Louis University, 1980), pp. 238–240;Google ScholarDiary of Richard Burtsell, pp. 334, xviii.
21. Diary of Richard Burtsell, pp. 409–410.
22. Chinnici, Joseph P., “Organization of the Spiritual Life: American Catholic Devotional Works, 1791–1866”, Theological Studies 40 (1979): 233–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Spalding, John Lancaster, Life of the Most Rev. M. J. Spalding. D. D., Archibishop of Baltimore (New York, 1878), p. 308, quoted in Guilday, pp. 202–203.Google Scholar
24. See Kerr, Donal, “The Early Nineteenth Century: Patterns of Change tin Irish Spirituality]” in Irish Spirituality, ed. Maher, Michael (Dublin, 1981), p. 137;Google ScholarMiller, David W., “Irish Catholicism and the Great Famine”, Journal of Social History 9 (1975): 87;CrossRefGoogle ScholarLarkin, Emmet, “The Devotional Revolution in Ireland”, American Historical Review 77 (1972):649;Google ScholarFennell, Desmond, “The Myth of the Irish: A Failure of American Catholic Scholarship”, in The Changing Face of Catholic Ireland (London, 1968), p. 123;Google Scholar and Clark, Dennis, “The Irish Catholics: A Postponed Perspective”, in Immigrants and Religion in Urban America, ed. Miller, Randall M. and Marzik, Thomas D. (Philadelphia, 1977), pp. 53, 56–57.Google Scholar
25. Taves, , “Relocating the Sacred”, pp. 233–236.Google Scholar
26. Connolly, Sean J., Priests and People in Pre-Famine Ireland, 1780–1845 (New York, 1982), p. 147.Google Scholar
27. Gutman, Herbert, Work, Culture and Society in Industrializing America: Essays in Working-Class and Social History (New York, 1977), pp. 43–44.Google Scholar According to an old resident, “an Irish fairy brought over the water in her apron from the Lakes of Killarney and planted it in the humble part of the town”. Most Irish-American communities, however, probably did not have fairies who were willing to bring a bit of Irish holy water across the Atlantic to sanctify their wells.
28. The major exception of course was Saint Patrick's day, which went from a minor saint's day in Ireland to a major ethno-religious festival in the United States. For a discussion of the disappearance of Irish customs in the English context, see Lees, Lynn Hollen, Exiles of Erin: Irish Migrants in Victorian London (Ithaca, N.Y., 1979), pp. 185–190.Google Scholar
29. Ursuline Manual, pp. 116–117; a slightly altered version of the same text is in St. Vincent's Manual, p. 102; similar instructions appears in Liguori, Mission Book, pp. 31, 37.
30. Catholic Manual, (Baltimore, [1825?]), p. 155.Google Scholar
31. Mission Book, p. 116.
32. Brown, Peter, “Society and the Supernatural: A Medieval Change”, Daedalus 104 (1975):144.Google Scholar
33. Faber, Frederick William, Devotion to the Pope (Baltimore, 1860), pp. 9–10, 12–13, 19–20, 23.Google Scholar
34. Ibid., pp. 31–32, 30.
35. I have chosen to compare the Irish with the Italians, a late nineteenth-century immigrant group, because the Italian Catholics resisted “romanization” more strenuously than any other group—a fact which gave rise to high-level ecclesiastical discussions of the “Italian problem”. See Browne, Henry J., “The ‘Italian Problem’ in the Catholic Church of the United States”, Historical Records and Studies 35 (1946):46–72.Google Scholar The Germans, like the Irish, adopted romanized devotions quite readily. See Dolan, Jay P., The Immigrant Church: New York's Irish and German Catholics, 1815–1865 (Baltimore, 1977), pp. 75–81.Google Scholar
36. Vecoli, Rudolph, “Prelates and Peasants: Italian Immigrants and the Catholic Church”, Journal of Social History 2 (1969): 228–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Tomasi, Silvano M., Piety and Power: The Role of the Italian Parishes in the New York Metropolitan Area, 1880–1930 (New York, 1975), pp. 96–97.Google Scholar
38. Vecoli, , “Prelates and Peasants”, p. 238.Google Scholar
39. Shea, John Gilmary, “The Progress of the Church in the United States”, Catholic Quarterly Review 9 (1884):496Google Scholar, quoted in Vecoli, “Prelates and Peasants”, p. 237.
40. Vecoli, , “Prelates and Peasants”, pp. 222–223.Google Scholar
41. Shannon, William V., The American Irish, rev. ed. (New York, 1966), p. 21.Google Scholar
42. Larkin, , “Devotional Revolution”, p. 649.Google Scholar
43. Fennell, , “Myth of the Irish”, p. 123.Google Scholar
44. Larkin, , “Devotional Revolution”, p. 649.Google Scholar See Lees, , Exiles of Erin, pp. 193–197,Google Scholar for a discussion of Roman Catholicism and Irish identity in mid-nineteenth-century London. Jonathan Sperber's recent study of nineteenth-century German Catholicism suggests a number of parallels with the Irish situation. Like their Irish and American counterparts, German Catholics, especially in the northern and predominantly Protestant areas, experienced a revival of religion during the middle decades of the nineteenth century. According to Sperber, the “new practices and organizations replaced their more laic or secular … predecessors with relatively little opposition. Since the Catholic masses, even when engaging in practices that the clergy regarded as morally abhorrent, had always seen their actions in a religious context, and the self-conscious but bourgeois Vormärz secularism never spread widely among the population, there was no mass-based, effective ideology which might have contested the religious revival”; Sperber, Jonathan, Popular Catholicism in Nineteenth- Century Germany (Princeton, 1984), p. 280.Google Scholar This example suggests that it was the anticlericalism of the Italians which provided an effective, mass-based ideology capable of contesting what was clearly a very clerically oriented revival of religion.
45. Berger, Peter, The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion (Garden City, N.Y., 1967; Anchor Books, 1969), p. 138.Google Scholar
46. On Catholic missions as analogs of Protestant revivals, see Dolan, Jay, Catholic Revivalism: The American Experience, 1830–1900 (Notre Dame, 1978), pp. 187–192;Google ScholarMcLoughlin, William G., Jr., Modern Revivalism: Charles Grandison Finney to Billy Graham (New York, 1959);Google Scholar and Sizer, Sandra, Gospel Hymns and Social Religion: The Rhetoric of Nineteenth-Century Revivalism (Philadelphia, 1978)Google Scholar
47. Marty, Martin E., “America's Iconic Book”, in Humanizing America's Iconic Book: SBL Centennial Addresses, 1980, ed. Tucker, Gene M. and Knight, Douglas A. (Chino, Calif., 1982), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
48. Ibid., pp. 13–14.
49. Quoted in ibid., pp. 14–15.
50. Fogarty, Gerald P., “The Quest for a Catholic Vernacular Bible in America”, in The Bible in America: Essays in Cultural History. ed. Hatch, Nathan O. and Noll, Mark A. (New York, 1982), p. 177.Google Scholar
51. Williams, J. Paul, What Americans Believe and How They Worship (New York, 1962), p. 46,Google Scholar quoted in Marty, “America's Iconic Book”, pp. 10–11.
- 2
- Cited by