No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Canadian Confederation and the Protestant Churches*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
On July 1, 1867, the colonies of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick were united by an act of the imperial parliament—The British North America Act—to form a federal state known as Canada. The centennial of this Confederation was celebrated by Canadians in 1967. In this paper I want to discuss its influence on the Protestant churches of Canada.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Church History 1969
References
1. Presbyterian, 08, 1867, p. 230.Google Scholar
2. Peake, F. A., “Movements towards Christian Unity in the Post-Confederation Period,” in the Journal of the Canadian Church Historical Society, 12, 1967, p. 97.Google Scholar
3. There was certainly agitation for annexation in Pictou county in 1870. Christian Guardian, 02 9, 1870, p. 22.Google Scholar
4. “The French section of the community, who are unhappily controlled by self-seeking priests, have now complete ascendancy.” Christian Messenger (Brantford), 07 10, 1856.Google Scholar
5. Canadian Baptist, November 17, 1859.
6. Christian Guardian, 0314, 1866, p. 42.Google Scholar
7. Canadian Independent, 08, 1867, p. 71.Google Scholar
8. Christian Guardian, 11 18, 1868, p. 190.Google Scholar
9. Canadian Methodist Magazine, 09, 1875, p. 370.Google Scholar
10. Presbyterian Witness, 04 14, 1866, p. 116.Google Scholar
11. Canadian Independent, 01, 1866, P. 219.Google Scholar
12. Canadian Baptist, August 30, 1866.
13. Speech to the Confederation Resolutions, February 8, 1865. Waite, P. B. (ed.), The Confederation Debates in the Province of Canada, 1865 (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1963), p. 60.Google Scholar Brown also described Confederation as “the duty which an over-ruling Providence has placed upon us.” Ibid., p. 79.
14. Presbyterian Witness, 06 2, 1866, p. 172.Google Scholar
15. Home and Foreign Record of the Canada Presbyterian Church, 01, 1868, p. 65.Google Scholar
16. Presbyterian Witness, 06 29, 1867, p. 204.Google Scholar
17. Christian Guardian, 01 1, 1868, p. 2.Google Scholar
18. Guardian, July 17, 1867.
19. See footnote 7 above and the point it refers to in the text.
20. Canadian Independent, 08, 1867, p. 71.Google Scholar
21. Guardian, July 17, 1867.
22. Canadian Independent, 08, 1867, p. 71.Google Scholar
23. Christian Guardian, 01 1, 1868, P. 2.Google Scholar
24. Presbyterian Witness, 09 21, 1867, p. 301.Google Scholar
25. Home and Foreign Record, 10, 1867, p. 370.Google Scholar
26. Christian Guardian, 07 4, 1866, p. 106.Google Scholar
27. Home and Foreign Record, 10, 1867, p. 269.Google ScholarChristian Guardian, 09 11, 1867, p. 146Google Scholar; September 18, 1867, p. 149.
28. “Intemperance can have no place in the halls of the legislatures. Rulers must realize the responsibffity of their position and regulate their conduct accordingly,” Home and Foreign Record 10, 1867, p. 369.Google Scholar
29. Canadian Independent, 07, 1867, p. 1.Google Scholar
30. Presbyterian, 10, 1866, pp. 310, 311.Google Scholar
31. Christian Guardian, 07 4, 1866, p. 106.Google Scholar
32. Proceedings, General Synod of the Church of England in Canada, 1893, pp. 8, 9.Google Scholar
33. Presbyterian Witness, 09 17, 1864, p. 150.Google Scholar
34. Grant, W. L. and Hamilton, Frederick, Principal Grant (Toronto: Morang and Company Limited, 1904), p. 155.Google Scholar
35. McNeill, J. T., The Presbyterian Church in Canada, 1875–1925 (Toronto: General Board of the Presbyterian Church in Canada, 1925), p. 19.Google Scholar
36. The Executive Committee of the Canadian Wesleyan New Connexion Church protested against “unwarranted interference” from its British parent body on the union issue. Caldwell, J. Warren, “The Unification of Methodism in Canada, 1865–1884” in The Bulletin, 1967, p. 21.Google Scholar
37. Johnston, J. A., “Factors in the Formation of the Presbyterian Church in Canada, 1875,” doctoral thesis in the Archives of The United Church of Canada and Victoria University, 1955, p. 170.Google Scholar
38. Boon, T. C. B., The Anglican Church from the Bay, to the Rockies (Toronto: Ryerson, 1962), p. 186.Google Scholar
39. The Rev. A. B. Courtice of the Bible Christians wrote of the Methodist union that was to be consummated in 1884, “The present movement, if not balked, is to be a great and gracious blessing to the North-Western portion of this Dominion, now providentially opened up as an inviting mission field.” Observer, May 24, 31, 1882.
40. Vernon, C. W., The Old Church in the New Dominion (London: SPCK, 1929), p. 89.Google Scholar
41. Carroll, John, Case and His Cotemporaries. Vol. V. (Toronto: Methodist Publishing Rouse, 1877), 214–218.Google Scholar
42. Gregg, William, History of the Presbyterian Church in the Dominion of Canada (Toronto: Presbyterian Printing and Publishing Co., 1855), p. 574.Google Scholar
43. Sutherland, A., Methodism in Canada, (Toronto: Methodist Mission Room, 1904), pp. 282–283.Google Scholar
44. Riddell, J. H., Methodism in the Middle West (Toronto: Ryerson, 1946), p. 52.Google Scholar
45. Jones, J. Gordon, Greatness Passing By! (Toronto: Baptist Federation of Canada, 1967), p. 45.Google Scholar
46. Canadian Independent, 03, 1867, p. 354.Google Scholar
47. Toronto, James Campbell; London, Sampson Low.
48. Senator William McMaster was the leading promoter of the Dominion Board which for some years sought to co-ordinate the missionary work of Baptists in eastern and western Canada. Hamilton, Robert, “The Founding of McMaster University,” B.D. thesis, McMaster University, 1938, p. 81.Google Scholar
49. “The North-west is the question for Canada.” Christian Guardian, 10 14, 1868, p. 170.Google Scholar
50. Grant and Hamilton, op. cit., p. 131.
51. Presbyterian Witness, 09 17, 1864, P. 150.Google Scholar
52. Acts 17:5 quoted in the Canadian Independent, 10, 1867, p. 149.Google Scholar
53. J. Gordon Jones, op. cit., p. 85.
54. See articles by Freitag, Walter and Mladenovic, Milos in Grant, J. W. (ed.), The Churches and the Canadian Experience (Toronto: Ryerson, 1963), pp. 94–118.Google Scholar