Article contents
Calvin's Conception of the “Communio Sanctorum”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
The year 1936 marks the four hundredth anniversary of the Institutes of the Christian Religion In that work is contained the mature expression of Calvin's religious thought. Attention may well be centered, at this time, upon one of the most procreative conceptions contained in the Institutes—a conception still rich in suggestions for our community of Christian life. The conception is that of the “societas fidelium” or the “communia sanctorum.” In the following study the “communia sanctorum” is considered in relation to its concept and to predestination, cult, discipline, and social service.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Church History 1936
References
1 For the discussion, of the Institutes, their various editions, their critical analysis and their comparative significance see especially: Ioannis Calvini Opera Quae Supersunt Omnia, ed. Baum, G., Cunitz, E., Reuss, E., Brunsvigae 1865, III, VII–XLVIIGoogle Scholar; Calvin, Jean, Institution de la Religion Chréstienne, ed. Lefrane, A., Chatelain, H., et Pannier, J., Paris, 1911, I, 1–57Google Scholar; Doumergue, E., Jean Calvin: les hommes et les choses de son temps; Lausanne, 1910, IV, 1–17Google Scholar. Foster, H. D., Collected Papers, p. 32.Google Scholar
2 Opera, I, 72Google Scholar—Credo sanctam ecclesiam catholicam, sanctorum communionem, remissionem peceatorum, carnis resurrectionem, vitam aeternam. Cf. Opera, I, 77–78.Google Scholar
3 Opera, I, 72Google Scholar—Primum credimus sanctam ecclesiam catholicam, hoc est, universum electorum numerum, sive angeli sint, sive homines.…; ex hominibus, sive mortui, sive adhuc vivant; ex viventibus, quibuscunque in terris agant, a ut ubivis gentium dispersi sint; unam esse ecclesiam ac societatem et unum Dei populum cuius Christus, Dominus noster, dux sit et princeps, ac tanquam unius corporis caput; prout in ipso divina bonitate electi sunt, ante miundi constitutionem, ut in regnum Dei omnes aggregarentur, sq. Of. also Inst., IV 1, 2–3Google Scholar—Opera, II 746–748Google Scholar; 1541 ed. pp. 265–266.
4 Opera, II, 72–73Google Scholar—Haec autem societas catholica est, id est, universalis, quia non duas aut tres invenire liceat, verum electi Dei sic omnes in Christo uniuntur ac coadunantur, ut quemadmodum ab uno capite pendent, ita in unum velut corpus coalescant; … Inst., IV 1, 2Google Scholar—Opera, II, 747Google Scholar reads: Quin sic electi Dei omnes in Christo sunt connexi, ut quemadmodum ab uno capite pendent, ita in unum velut corpus coalescant, ea inter se compage cohaerentes que eiusdem corporis membra; vere unum facti, qui una fide, spe, caritate, eodem Dei spiritu simul vivunt, non in eandem modo vitae aeternae haereditatem, sed in unius Dei ac Christi participationem etiam vocati. Cf. 1541 ed. p. 266.
5 Opera, I, 77–78Google Scholar; Inst., IV 1, 2–3Google Scholar—Opera, II, 747–748Google Scholar: Atque ideo adiungitur sanctorum communicatio. Quae particula licet a veteribus fere praetermissa sit, non tamen negligenda est, quia ecclesiae qualitatem optime exprimit. Quasi dictum esset hae lege aggregari sanctos in soeietatem Christi, ut quaecunque in eos beneficia Deus confert, inter se mutuo communicent.
6 Inst., IV 1, 7Google Scholar—Opera, II, 752–753Google Scholar—Inst., IV 1, 2Google Scholar—Opera, II, 747Google Scholar; Nisi enim sub capite nostro Christo coadunati simus reliquis omnibus membris, nulla nos manet spes haereditatis futurae.
7 Inst., IV 1, 3Google Scholar; Opera, II, 748Google Scholar; 1541 ed. pp. 268–269.
8 Inst., IV 1, 7–8Google Scholar; Opera, II, 752–753Google Scholar; Opera, I, 75.Google Scholar
9 Ibid., II VIII, 55; Opera, II, 305–306Google Scholar; Inst., III, XXIII, 14Google Scholar; Opera, II, 710–711.Google Scholar
10 Doumergue, , op. cit., V, 20, pp. 55–67.Google Scholar
11 For the sources upon which the foregoing is based see especially: 1541 ed. pp. 471–473, 485–495; Inst., III XXI, 5Google Scholar; Opera, II, 682 ff.Google Scholar; Inst., III XXIII, 12Google Scholar; Opera, II, 708.Google Scholar
12 Troeltseh, E., “Calvin and Calvinism,” Hibbert Journal, 10 1909, pp. 108 ff.Google Scholar
13 For the relation of election, vocation, justification, faith, works, etc. see especially 1541 ed. pp. 354, 387–390; Inst., III, XIV, 8, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21Google Scholar; Opera, II, 560, 575–579.Google Scholar
14 Inst., III XVI,18Google Scholar; Opera, II, 576Google Scholar: Sic fundata, erecta, stabilita conscientia operum quoque consideratione stabilitur; quatenus, scilicet testimonia sunt Dei in nobis habitantis ac regnantis.
15 Ibid., III XIV, 28; Opera, II, 577–578Google Scholar: Videmus iam non earn in sanctis fiduciam operum esse quae vel eorum merito aliqnid tribuat (quando ea non aliter quam Dei dona intuentur, unde eius bonitatem recognoscant, non aliter quam vocationis signa unde electionem reputent), … Cf. Ibid., III, XIV, 19; Opera, II, 577Google Scholar. Cf. also III, XV, 8; Opera, II, 585Google Scholar: Ecce, non iustifieamus hominem ex operibus coram Deo; sed omaes qui ex Deo sunt, dicimus regenari, et novam creaturam fierei, ut ex regno peccati transeant in regnum iustitiae, atque hoc testimonio certam facere suam vocationem, et tanquam arbores a fructibus indicari.
16 1541 ed. pp. 490–491 ff. Opera, II, 716.Google Scholar
17 Doumergue, , op. cit., V, 625 ff.; IV, 284–287.Google Scholar
18 Troeltsch, , op. cit., p. 119.Google Scholar
19 Choisy, E., La théocratie à Genève am temps de Calvin, Genève, n. d., pp. 232 ff.Google Scholar
20 Choisy, , op. cit., pp. 232–238Google Scholar; Articles of 1537, Opera, X a, 12–14Google Scholar; see also Walker, , op. cit., p. 129Google Scholar; 1541 ed., the Argument, p. II: Combien que la saincte Escriture contienne une doctrine parfaicte, à laquelle on ne peut rien adjouster: comme en icelle nostre Seigneur a voulu desployer les Thresors infiniz de sa Sapience. Cf. Reyburn, H.John Calvin, London, 1914, pp. 351–354Google Scholar; Doumergue, , op. cit., IV, 54–84.Google Scholar
21 Inst., III, xx, 30–31Google Scholar; Opera, II, 657, 658Google Scholar: Potissimus tarnen linguae usus est in orationibus publicis, quae in fidelium conventu habentur; quibus hoc agitur, ut Deum, quem uno spiritu eademque fide colimus, communi una voce et veluti eodem omnes ore pariter glorificemus, idque palam, ut omnes vicissim, a suo quisque fratre, confessionem fide accipiant ad eius exemplum invitentur et incitentur. Cf. 1541 ed. p. 541. Cf. also on songa, chants, etc., Inst., III, XX, 32Google Scholar; Opera, II, 659Google Scholar; Articles of 1537, Opera, Xa, 12.Google Scholar
22 The 1541 edition, p. 541 reads: Dont aussi il appert, que oraisons publiques ne se doivent faire ne en langage Grec entre les Latins: ne en latin entre Franeoys ou Anglois, (comme la coustume a esté par tout cy devant), mais en langaige commun du pays: qui se puisse entendre de toute l'assemblée. Cf. Inst., III, XX, 33Google Scholar; Opera, II, 659.Google Scholar
23 Inst., III, XX, 38Google Scholar; Opera, II. 663Google Scholar; 1541 ed. pp. 546–547. Cf. Doumergue, , op. cit., IV, 339–340.Google Scholar
24 Inst., III, XX, 38Google Scholar; Opera, II, 664Google Scholar: Neque solum quos tales ad praesens videt atque cognoseit, sed emnes qui super terrain agunt homines; de quibus quid statuent Deus, extra notitiam est; nisi quod illis optima optare et sperare non minus pium quam humanum est.
25 Inst., III, XX, 39, 47Google Scholar; Opera, II, 664, 675.Google Scholar
26 Inst., IV, XVII, 1, 3–10Google Scholar; Opera, , II, 1002 f.Google Scholar, 1007–1010; Inst., IV, XVII, 2, 9–10, 37Google Scholar; Opera, IV, 977, 985–986, 1040.Google Scholar
27 Inst., IV, XVII, 38Google Scholar; Opera, II, 1040Google Scholar; Opera, IV, 1041–1042.Google Scholar
28 For the ethical significance of the communion in the life of the communicant see Foster, , op. cit., p. 48.Google Scholar
29 McNeill, J. T., Unitive Protestantism, New York, 1930, pp. 47–49Google Scholar; McNeill, , Makers of Christianity, II, 193Google Scholar; Foster, , op. cit., pp. 49 ff.Google Scholar
30 Inst., IV, XII, 1–3, 5, 15Google Scholar; Opera, II, 905–906, 907–908Google Scholar; on the reclamatory ends of the process of excommunication see Inst., IV, XII, 10Google Scholar; Opera, II, 911Google Scholar; Opera, IV, 830.Google Scholar
31 On the process of discipline, excommunication and restoration and its significance for communion see Opera, Xa, 7–10; Inst., IV, XII, 4; Opera, II, 907.Google Scholar
32 Opera, XXXIV, 115 cited by Doumergue, , op. cit., V, 629, note 5.Google Scholar
33 Commentary on the Ephesians, , IV, 16Google Scholar, cited by McNeill, , Unitive Protestantism, pp. 31–33.Google Scholar
34 Inst., III, VII, 5Google Scholar (Allen's tr.); Opera, II, 509Google Scholar, says: At scriptura ut eo nos manu ducat, praemonet, quidquid a Domino gratiarum obtinemus, esse nobis hac lege concreditum, nt in commune ecclesiae bonum conferatur. Ideoque legitimum gratiarum omnium usum esse, liberalem ae benignam cum aliis communieationem.
35 Inst., II, VIII, 39Google Scholar; Opera, II, 294.Google Scholar
36 Doumergue, , op. cit., V, 629–30Google Scholar; Opera, XXXIII, 308–309.
37 Inst., II, VIII, 55 (Beveridge tr.)Google Scholar; Opera, II, 306Google Scholar: Sed dico, universum hominum. genus, nulla exceptione, uno caritatis affectu esse amplexandum: … nullum hic esse discrimen barbari aut Graeci, digni vel indigni, ainici vel inimici; quoniam in Deo, non in se ipsis considerandi sunt.
38 Inst., III, XXIII, 14Google Scholar; Opera, II, 711.Google Scholar
39 Inst., III, VI, 4Google Scholar; Opera, II, 504Google Scholar: Nom enim linguae est doctrina, sed vitae.
40 Doumergue, , op. cit. V, 625–633Google Scholar; Opera, I, 75.Google Scholar
41 Troeltseh, , op. cit., pp. 119–120.Google Scholar
42 Troeltsch, , op. cit., pp. 120–121.Google Scholar
43 Inst., III, VII, 7Google Scholar; Opera, II, 511–512Google Scholar. Too often (cf. Opera, IV, 194)Google Scholar: “quand un homme riche a donné quelque chose du sien, il laisse là toutes les autres charges, et, s'en exempte comme si elles ne luy appartenoyent de rien.”
44 Doumergue, , op. cit., V, 631Google Scholar; McNeill, , Makers of Christianity, 193; McNeill, Unitive Protestantism, pp. 49–56.Google Scholar
45 Cf. Doumergue, , op. cit., V, 631–32Google Scholar for Troeltsch's ideas more fully developed; cf. Choisy, , op. cit., pp. 278, 231, 266Google Scholar; cf. Inst., III, IX, 3Google Scholar; 1541 ed. p. 813.
46 Troeltsch, , op. cit., pp. 120–121.Google Scholar
47 Foster, , op. cit., pp. 30–76Google Scholar for “Calvin's Programme for a Puritan State.”
48 Cf. the Ordonnances ecclesiastiques, Opera, Xa, 15 ff.Google Scholar, 91 ff.; cf. Kidd, B., Documents, Oxford, 1911, 591–603Google Scholar; Choisy, , op. cit., 231, 249–250Google Scholar; Harkness, G., John Calvin, N. Y., 1931, pp. 26, 28, 221 ff.Google Scholar; Inst., IV. III, 9Google Scholar; Keyburn, , op. cit., pp. 335 ff.Google Scholar
49 Reyburn, , op. cit., p. 207Google Scholar; Harkness, , op. cit., p. 50 ff.Google Scholar; Opera, Xa, 245–249Google Scholar; Opera, XXIV, 679–683; Doumergue, , op. cit., V, 624–712Google Scholar; Harkness, , op. cit., pp. 157–221.Google Scholar
50 Foster, , op. cit., p. 73Google Scholar; ef. Doumergue, , op. cit., V, 233–301Google Scholar for social character and the social services of Calvin and Calvinism. For a discussion of governmental theory cf. Inst., IV, XX; Foster, , op. cit., pp. 36, 38–43Google Scholar; Harkness, , op. cit., pp. 221–237.Google Scholar
51 Troeltseh, , op. cit., pp. 117–118.Google Scholar
52 Troeltseh, , op. cit., p. 121.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by