Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
I have long been intrigued with the role of the American churches in dividing the nation and reinforcing the sectional conflict that led to the Civil War. Elsewhere I have argued that evangelical Protestantism was a major bond of unity for the United States during the first part of the nineteenth century; that the chief institutional forms of this faith were the large popular denominations—Methodist, Baptist, Presbyterian, each with nationwide constituencies; that these denominations, increasingly agitated by disputes over slavery, sundered into northern and southern factions long before political rupture, thus opening the first major cleavage between slaveholding and free states; and that the denominational schisms portended and to some extent provoked the crisis of the Union in 1861. What I wish to pursue further in this article is how the regional religion which these schisms both exposed and augmented not only broke a primary bond of national unity but also furnished a persuasive example of sectional independence, encouraged the myth of peaceable secession, reinforced North-South alienation, and heightened the moral outrage which each section felt against the other. The “inner civil war” of the divided churches thus exacerbated the ordeal of the Union and confirmed the nation's course to unrepressed conflict.
1. Goen, C. C., “Scenario for Secession: Denominational Schisms and the Coming of the Civil War,” paper presented at a conference on“Religion in the American South,” Florida State University, 1981;Google Scholar to be published with other papers from the conference under the editorship of Samuel S. Hill, Jr. A forthcoming book, Broken Churches, Broken Nation: Denominational Schisms and the Coming of the American Civil War, will incorporate the substance of that and the present essay, along with much more material both documentary and interpretive.
2. A Southern Clergyman [Brookes], Iveson L., A Defence of Southern Slavery against the Attacks of Henry Clay and Alex'r. Campbell (Hamburg, S.C., 1851), preface.Google Scholar
3. Birney, to Jay, Will (a London minister), 5 10 1840, in Letters of James G. Birney, 1831–1857, ed. Dumond, Dwight L., 2 vols. (New York, 1938), 2:605.Google Scholar
4. Potter, David, The Impending Crisis, 1848–1861 (New York, 1976), p. 94.Google Scholar
5. Capers later gave the letter to the Richmond Christian Advocate, which printed it 7 August 1851.Google Scholar
6. Southern Religious Telegraph (Richmond), 4 August 1837,Google Scholar quoted in Thompson, Ernest T., Presbyterians in the South, 3 vols. (Richmond, 1963–1973), 1:401.Google Scholar
7. Winans, William, quoted in the Christian Advocate and Journal (New York), 2105 1845, p.162.Google Scholar
8. Proposal for a separate denomination, signed by 51 southern Methodist ministers, in Sutton, R., The Methodist Church Property Case (Richmond, 1851), p.90.Google Scholar
9. Religious Herald (Richmond), 13 March 1845.Google Scholar
10. Document in Elliott, Charles, History of the Great Secession from the Methodist Episcopal Church (Cincinnati, 1855), p.1045.Google Scholar
11. A Calm Appeal to Southern Baptists in Advocacy of Separation from the North in All the Works of Christian Benevolence (n.p., [1845?]),. 7.Google Scholar
12. Sumter Banner, 21 March 1849,Google Scholar quoted in Craven, Avery O., The Coming of the Civil War, 2d ed. (Chicago, 1957), p. 244;Google Scholar Speeches of John C. Calhoun, ed. Richard Crallé (New York,1968), p. 556;Google Scholar the newspaper admonition appeared first in the Mississippi Baptist and was reprinted in the Eastern Clarion (Jackson) on 5 December 1860 (see Rainwater, Percy Lee, Mississippi: Storm Center of Secession, 1856–1865 [Boston, 1938], p. 175);Google Scholar Simms to Bockee, John Jacob, 12 12 1860, in The Letters of William Gilmore Simms, ed. Simms, Mary C. et al. , 5 vols. (Columbia, S.C., 1952–1956), 4:288.Google Scholar
13. New York Baptist Register (Utica), 4 April 1845, p. 34;Google Scholar Wayland, to Jeter, Jeremiah B. of Richmond, , quoted in Baker, Robert A., Relations between Northern and Southern Baptists (Fort Worth, 1948), p. 89;Google Scholar Dr.Wayland on the Moral and Religious Aspects of the Nebraska Bill (Rochester, 1854), p.5;Google Scholar New York Observer (Old School Presbyterian), 22 November 1860, p.370.Google Scholar
14. Nevins, Allan, The Emergence of Lincoln, 2 vols. (New York, 1950), 2:332.Google Scholar
15. Nagel, Paul C., One Nation Indivisible: The Union in American Thought, 1776–1861 (New York, 1964), pp. 264–265.Google Scholar
16. Bushnell, Horace, Reverses Needed, a Disclosure Delivered on the Sunday after the Disaster at Bull Run (Hartford, 1861), p. 20.Google Scholar Bushnell's concept of organic nationhood is examined by Barnes, Howard A.,“The Idea that Caused a War: Horace Bushnell versus Thomas Jefferson,” Journal of Church and State 16(1974): 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. The doctrine of states' rights, of course, originally meant much more than the right to withdraw from the Union. Bestor,, Arthur“The American Civil War as a Constitutional Crisis,” American Historical Review 69 (1964): 350,CrossRefGoogle Scholar reminded us that“secession itself was responsible for reducing the argument over state sovereignty to such simple terms.”
18. The observation was made by Alexander H. Stephens, vice-president of the Confederacy. See Wilson, Edmund, Patriotic Gore: Studies in the Literature of the American Civil War (New York, 1961), pp. 97, 422.Google Scholar
19. The Works of Daniel Webster, 16th ed., 6, vols. (Boston, 1872), 5:331, 361.Google Scholar
20. Potter, , The Impending Crisis, p. 490,Google Scholar cites several such boasts.
21. Quoted in Potter, David, Lincoln and His Party in the Secession Crisis (New Haven, 1942), p.226.Google Scholar
22. Basil Manly, for example, a prominent Southern Baptist minister and president of the University of Alabama, rejoiced at his state's withdrawal from the Union.“I thank God… that I have lived, after thirty years of waiting, to see [secession]” (quoted in Daniel, W. Harrison,“Southern Protestantism and Secession,” The Historian 29 [1967]:405).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Potter, , The Impending Crisis, p.43.Google Scholar
24. See the summary of Craven's work in Potter, David, The South and the Sectional Conflict (Baton Rouge, 1968), pp. 94–95;Google Scholar see also Fehrenbacher, Don E.,“Disunion and Reunion,” in The Reconstruction of American History, ed. John, Higham (New York, 1962), p.117.Google Scholar
25. Christian Advocate and Journal, 4 September 1844, p.14.Google Scholar
26. Moorhead, James H., American Apocalypse: Yankee Protestants and the Civil War, 1860–1869 (New Haven, 1978), pp. 29–32,Google Scholar describes the hardening of northern attitudes toward the South.
27. Dabney, Robert Lewis to Dabney, Charles William (a brother), 15 01 1851, in The Life and Letters of Robert Lewis Dabney, ed. Johnson, Thomas C. (Richmond, 1903), p. 129;Google Scholar Thornwell, James Henley,“The Relation of the Church and Slavery” (1851),Google Scholar in The Collected Writings of James Henley Thornwell, ed. John B. Adger and J L. Girardeau, 4 vols. (Richmond, 1871–1873), 4:393;Google Scholar Smyth, Thomas,“The Sin and the Curse; Or, The Union the True Source of Disunion” (1860), in The Complete Works of Thomas Smyth, 10 vols. (Columbia, S.C., 1910),7:543.Google Scholar Smyth went on to attack the libertarianism of the Declaration of Independence as an“infidel, atheistic, French Revolution, Red Republican principle” which had become the“bitter root of all our evils” (p. 545).
28. Thornwell, James Henley,“Our National Sins” (1860), in Fast-Day Sermons; Or, The Pulpit on the State of the Country (New York, 1861), p. 40;Google Scholar Bascom, Henry B., A Brief Appeal to Public Opinion (Louisville, 1848), pp. 61–62;Google Scholar Elliott, Charles, South-Western Methodism: A History of the M. E. Church in the South- West from 1844 to 1864 (Cincinnati, 1868),Google Scholar preface; Southern Christian Advocate (Charleston), 4 October 1860.Google Scholar
29. Convention, Southern Baptist, Annual, 1861, p. 63;Google Scholar Smyth, Thomas,“The Sin and the Curse,” in Works, 7:542;Google Scholar Palmer, Benjamin Morgan,“Slavery as a Divine Trust,” inFast-Day Sermons, p. 70.Google Scholar See Eubank, Wayne C.,“Benjamin Morgan Palmer's Thanksgiving Sermon, 1860,” in Antislavery and Disunion, 1858–1861: Studies in the Rhetoric of Compromise and Conflict, ed. Auer, John Jeffrey (New York, 1963), pp. 291–309;Google Scholar and Monroe, Haskell,“Southern Presbyterians and the Secession Crisis,” Civil War History 6 (1960): 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. So reported the Central Presbyterian (Richmond), 11 May 1861, p.74.Google Scholar
31. Mckivigan, John R.,“The American Baptist Free Mission Society: Abolitionist Reaction to the 1845 Baptist Schism,” Foundations 21 (1978): 350–351.Google Scholar
32. The Christian Times (Chicago), 26 August 1857, p. 1;Google Scholar Western Christian Advocate (Cincinnati), 31 August 1854.Google Scholar
33. Minor, to Dabney, Robert Lewis, 14 January 1861, in Life and Letters of Robert Lewis Dabney, p. 219.Google Scholar
34. Peck, Jesse T., History of the Great Republic, Considered from a Christian Stand-Point (New York, 1868), p.693.Google Scholar
35. The Presbyterian (Philadelphia), 21 September 1861, p.150.Google Scholar
36. Both reports are printed in Frank, Moore, ed., Rebellion Record: A Diary of American Events, 12 vols. (New York, 1861–1868), 3:P-13, 4:P-22.Google Scholar
37. Report of Debates in the General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church, ed. Robert A. West (New York, 1855), p.95.Google Scholar