Article contents
Arius: Twice a Heretic?
Arius and the Human Soul of Jesus Christ
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
“Christology was an important element of the earliest Arianism.” So states Raven in the introductory chapters to his study of apollinarianism. This paper will consider the christology of the “earliest′ Arians,” in particular that of Arius himself. Christology has been defined as “the study of the Person of Christ, and in particular of the union in Him of the Divine and human natures.” In the latter “particular” sense, we shall conclude that Arius really had no developed christology. This is not to say, however, that Arius was not christologically concerned in the larger sense of the word; i.e., “the study of the Person of Christ.” It is true to say after Dorner that:
We should be very greatly mistaken … if we were to suppose that the Christological labours had meanwhile been totally suspended: on the contrary, in the case of the thinkers of the Church, Christology was the perennial motive of their trinitarian efforts.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Church History 1960
References
1. Raven, Charles E., Apollinarianism, (Cambridge, 1923), p. 86.Google Scholar
2. Cross, F. L., ed., The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, (Oxford, 1958), p. 278.Google Scholar
3. Dorner, J. A., History of the Development of the Doctrine of the Person of Christ, Eng. tr., Simon (Edinburgh, 1875), vol. III, p. 332.Google Scholar
4. Harnack, Adolph, History of Dogma, Eng. Tr. from 3rd German edition by Speirs, and Millar, , (London, 1898), vol. iv, p. 19.Google Scholar “All that Scripture and tradition assert in reference to the incarnation and the humanity of this being holds good; he truly took a human body (sōma apsuchon); the feelings shewn by the historical Christ teach us that the Logos to whom they attach—for Christ had not a human soul— is a being capable of suffering, not an absolutely perfect being, but one who attains by effort absolute perfection.”
5. Dorner, op. cit., p. 243.
6. Gwatkin, H.M., Studies of Arianism (Cambridge, 1882), p. 2.Google Scholar
7. Kelly, J. N. D., Early Christian Doctrines (New York, 1958), p. 281.Google Scholar
8. Cave, , The Doctrine of the Person of Christ (London, 1925), p. 98.Google Scholar
9. Cross, op. cit., p. 278; D. T. C., Vol. VIII, Col. 1257.
10. Raven, op. cit., p. 178.
11. Hardy, E. R. and Richardson, Cyril, Christology of the Later Fathers, vol. 33 of the Christian Classics, (Philadelphia, 1954), p. 30.Google Scholar
12. Harnack, op. cit., p 146.
13. Dorner, op. cit., p. 518.
14. Theodoret, , Dialogues, 3. Post-Nicene Fathers, second series, vol. III, p. 235.Google Scholar The Greek is taken from Dorner, op. cit., p. 518.
15. Gregory, of Nyssa, , Contra Eunomius, II, 13Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., vol. V, p. 127.Google Scholar
16. Gregory, of Nazianzus, , Epistle ad Cledon; PNF, 2nd ser., vol. VII, p. 440.Google Scholar
17. Kelly, op. cit., p. 282. Taken from Holl, Bibliothek der Symbole, sec. 191. Greek from article by Michel, A. on “Incarnation” in Dictionnaire de Théologie Catholique, v. 7, col. 1449. (Paris, 1903–1905).Google Scholar
17a. Gwatkin, op. cit., p. 74 (note).
18. Socrates, , Historia Ecclesiastica, I, 9Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., vol. II, p. 14.Google Scholar
19. Bardy, Gustave, Recherches sur Saint Lucien d'Antioche et son École (Paris, 1936), p. 347.Google Scholar
20. Bardy, op. cit., p. 228f. Eusubius preserves Arius' letter in a letter he wrote to Alexander preserved in the Acts of the Second Council of Nicea; Athanasius, , in De Synodis, 16Google Scholar; Hilary, in De Trinitate, IV, 11–12Google Scholar and in VI, 4; Foebade, in Contra Arian, 8Google Scholar; and Epiphanius, in Haeres, LXIX.Google Scholar
21. Bardy, op. cit., p. 224f.; Epiphanius, , Haeres, LXIXGoogle Scholar; Theodoret, , H. E., I, 4, 63Google Scholar; Epiphanius, the Scholastic, , in Cassiodore's Historia Tripartite, I, 15Google Scholar: the Latin translations are in Migne's, P. L., VII, 1035Google Scholar; and the other in Rev. Benedict. t. XXVI, 1909, p. 95.Google Scholar
22. Athanasius, , Oratione, adv. Ar., I, 5.Google ScholarPNF. ser. 2, vol. IV, pp. 308–9.Google Scholar This is with parallel texts in the Epist. ad episc. Aegypti et Lib., 12 used as the basis for fragments III and half of IV in Bardy, op. cit., pp. 261–2.
23. Richard, M., “S. Athanase et la Psychologie du Christ selon les Ariens,” Mélanges de Science Religieuse t. IV, 1947, pp. 7–9Google Scholar
24. Harnack, op. cit., p. 39.
25. Bardy, op. cit., p. 269. Quotation is from Athanasius, , Oratione, I, 51.Google Scholar Parallels in Ep. ad Episc. Aeg. et Lib., 12 and De Synodis, 15.
26. Richard, op. cit., p. 10.
27. Bardy, op. cit., pp. 292–3. Quotation is from Athanasius, Oratione, III, 10.
28. Ibid., p. 265. Quoted from Athanasius, , Oratione, I, 5.Google Scholar Parallel in Ep. ad Episc. Aeg. et Lib., 12.
29. Ibid.
30. Richard, op. cit., p. 10.
31. Bardy, op. cit., p. 262. Quoted from Athanasius, Oratione, I, 9. Tr. PNF, 2nd ser., vol. IV, p. 311.
32. Ibid., p. 267. Quoted from Athanasius, , Oratione, I, 6.Google Scholar For parallels, see Ep. ad Episc., Aegypt. et Lib., 12; De Decretis, 6; De Sent. Diony., 23. Tr. PNF, 2nd ser., vol. IV, p. 309.Google Scholar
33. Ibid., p. 264. Quoted from Athanasius, , Oratione, I, 6.Google Scholar
34. Athanasius, , De Synodis, 15Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., vol. IV, p. 457.Google Scholar
35. Bardy, op. cit., p. 275. Quoted from Socrates, , HE, 26Google Scholar; version, Sozomen's is in HE, II, 27.Google Scholar
36. Ibid., pp. 276–7.
37. Athanasius, , Epis. ad Episc. Aegypt. et Lib., 18Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., vol IV, p. 232.Google Scholar
38. Liebaert, , La Doctrine Christologique de Saint Cyrille d' Alexandre avant la Querelle Nestorienne (Lille, 1951), p. 114.Google Scholar
39. Raven, op. cit., p. 12. Quoted from Justin Martyr, Apol., 2, 10.
40. Ibid, p. 65.
41. Ibid. Quoted from Leontius adv. Nest. et Eutych., III.
42. Kelly, op cit., p. 159
43. Sellers, , Two Ancient Christologies (London, 1940), p. 32.Google Scholar
44. Tomus ad Antioch, 7; PNF, 2nd ser., vol. IV, p. 485.Google Scholar
45. Athanasius, , De Incarn., iv, 44Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., vol. IV, p. 44.Google Scholar
46. Athanasius, , De Decretis, 14Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., Vol. IV, p. 158.Google Scholar
47. Athanasius, , Oration adv. Ar., III, 30Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., Vol. IV, p. 410.Google Scholar
48. Ibid., III, 51; p. 421.
49. Ibid., III, 30; p. 410.
50. Athanasius, , De Synodis, 28Google Scholar; PNF, 2nd ser., Vol. IV, p. 466.Google Scholar
51. Raven, op. cit., p. 113.
52. Sellers, op. cit., pp. 23–4.
53. Richard, op. cit., p. 11.
54. Liebaert, op. cit., p. 239.
55. Bardy, op. cit., p. 280. Quoted from Augustine, , Contra Haeres, 49. Trans. by Muller, , (Catholic University of America, Washington, 1956) :Google Scholar “They are less known for maintaining the error that Christ assumed flesh alone, without a soul. I did not find this argued against them at any time by anyone. But Epiphanius testified to the truth of this, and I have certainly determined it from some of their writings and discourses.”
56. Ibid.Praedestinatus, I, 49. Bardy is of the opinion that whoever its author may be, the work depends directly upon Augustine.
57. Epiphanius, , Anacoratus, 33; ed. Dindorfius, (Lipsiae, 1859), Vol. I, p. 126.Google Scholar Literal translation: “St. Paul broke down the way of the Lucianists and the power of Arius, for Lucian and the Lucianists deny that the Son of God took a soul.”
58. Epiphanius, , Contra Haeres, LXIX, 19; ed. Dindorfius, (Lipsiae, 1861), Vol. III, p. 162.Google Scholar
59. Rufinus, , HE, ix, 6.Google Scholar Bardy refers to Rufinus' use of this statement of Epiphanius.
60. Bardy, op. cit., p. 154.
61. Unsigned article on “Epiphanius” in Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed., vol. IX, p. 695.Google Scholar
62. Tixeront, , A Handbook of Patrology, Eng. tr., (St. Louis, 1920), pp. 192–3.Google Scholar
63. Smith, and Wade, , ed., A Dictionary of Christian Biography, (London, 1880), Vol. II, p. 49f;Google Scholar article by A.A. Lipsius.
64. Supra, p. 1.
- 1
- Cited by