Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:33:06.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Woman of Rome: The Matron in Justin, 2 Apology 2.1–9

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Robert M. Grant
Robert M. Grant
Affiliation:
Mr. Grant is professor of New Testament and early Christianity in the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the sixth century Johannes Lydus revealed that the city of Rome had three names. The one related to mystic rites was Eros, while the hieratic one was Flora and the political one was Rome. The events we shall discuss took place at Rome, and under the influence of an Eros of sorts. We shall call the heroine “Flora” for reasons to be set forth later. The whole story is told by the early Christian apologist Justin.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , December 1985 , pp. 461 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mens. 4.73., p. 125.3 Wünsch. Names of classical authors and their works are abbreviated after The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 2d ed. (Oxford, 1970), p. ix–xxii.Google Scholar

2. On narrative see Keresztes, P., “The ‘So-Called’ Second Apology of Justin,” Latomus 24 (1965), p. 859;Google ScholarSider, R., Ancient Rhetoric and the Art of Tertullian (Oxford, 1971), pp. 21–23.Google Scholar

3. The whole text is printed as the Martyrdom of Ptolemaeus and Lucius in Krüger, G. and Ruhbach, G., Ausgewählte Märtyrerakten, (Tübingen, 1965), p. 14–15,Google Scholar and Musurillo, H., The Acts of the Christian Martyrs, (Oxford, 1972), pp. 38–41.Google Scholar

4. Casamassa, A., Gli apologisti greci (Rome, 1944), p. 73.Google Scholar

5. Controv. 1.2.22; Priapeia 3,8.

6. Basil, In martyrem Julittam, Migne, , PG 31, pp. 237–261,Google Scholar esp. 237C-240A.

7. A. Gellius 10.23.4; compare Dionys. Hal. 2.25.6.

8. Gellius 10.13.2.

9. Presumably Cato is the source of Pliny, Nat. hist. 14.90.

10. Ovid, , Ars amat. 3.765–766;Google Scholar Juvenal 6.300–301; Clement, Paed. 2.33.1–4(for the description see Chrys, Dio. Orat. 5.25).Google Scholar

11. Seneca, , Controv. 7.21;Google ScholarPetronius, ; Sat. 45, 69, 126;Google Scholar Martial 7.35; 11.75; Juvenal 6.331, 422; compare Vettius Valens 2.16, p. 75, 15 Kroll; Bardesanes in Eusebius, Praep. evang. 6.10.21.

12. Frag. 12, p. 86, 36 Lutz (Yale Class. Stud. 10, 1947).

13. Oneis. 1.78, p. 88, 5 Pack.

14. Paed. 3.32.3; compare Cicero, , Pro Cael., pp. 57–58.Google Scholar

15. Frag. 3, p. 41, 17.

16. Paed. 2.97.2–3; compare Musonius (?) ap. Stob, . Flor. 3.6.23, p. 286,Google Scholar 8 Hense.

17. Text and commentary by Chadwick, H., The Sentences of Sextus (Cambridge, 1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18. Paed. 2.87.3; 88.3.

19. See 1 Clem. 35.5–6. For a similar but later collection involving Romans see Theophilus, , Ad Autol. 3.13–14.Google Scholar

20. Mand. 4.1.5, 9.

21. Frag. 13A, p. 88, 24.

22. Lampe, G. W. H., ed., A Patristic Greek Lexicon, p. 850.Google Scholar

23. Coniug. praec. 16–17, 140B-C.

24. For examples see Schneider, K., “Meretrix,” Pauly-Wissowa, Real-Encyclopaedie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1931), 15:1021.Google Scholar

25. See the passages listed by Friedländer, L., M. Valeri, Martialis Epigrammaton Libri (Leipzig, 1886), 2:104,203.Google Scholar

26. Justin, Apol. 2.15.3; Tatian, , Or. 34;Google Scholar Clement, Protr. 61.2.

27. Strack, H. L. and Billerbeck, P., Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud und Midrasch (Munich, 1926), 3:68–69,Google Scholar especially the reference to Nedarim 20 a-b.

28. Compare Paed. 2.87.1–2; 95.3; Augustine, , De bono coniug. 12Google Scholar(CSEL 41:203).

29. Frag, . 12, pp. 84, 31;Google Scholar 86, 3; followed by Clement, Paed. 2.97.2; 98.1.

30. Diss. 1.6.9; see also Clement, Paed. 2.87.1–3.

31. Dio Cass. 51.17.1; Athenaeus 10. 420E; compare Quintilian, Inst. 1.2.7.

32. Synebiou occurs at the beginning of the narrative; for symbiosis see Levy, E., Der Hergang der römischen Ehescheidung (Weimar, 1925), p. 111;Google ScholarDelling, G., “Eheleben,” Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum (1959), 4:697Google Scholar (his article, “Ehescheidung,” ibid., pp. 707–719, does not mention our case).

33. Levy, p. 59, with references to Justin and Tertullian; compare p. 84.

34. Marriage contracts in Mitteis, L. and Wilcken, U., Grundzüge und Chrestomathie der Papyruskunde, 2.2 (Leipzig, 1912), pp. 313–339Google Scholar(nos. 280–300); Hunt, A. S. and Edgar, C. C., Select Papyri (London, 1932), 1:2–31Google Scholar (nos. 1–9).

35. Wolff, H. J., “Das iudicium de moribus und sein Verhältnis zur actio rei uxoriae,” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte (Romanistische Abteilung) 54 (1934): 315–321.Google Scholar

36. See Millar, F., The Emperor in the Roman World (Cornell, 1977), pp. 465–549.Google Scholar Note the case cited on p. 472 and the comments on p. 547.

37. Valerius Maximus 8.2.3 (cited by Wolff, pp. 318–319); Plutarch, , Marius 38.3–4.Google Scholar

38. S.H.A., M. Antoninus, 19. 8–9.Google Scholar

39. Among many examples we note P. Giss. 41, in which a strategos requests sixty days' leave “to put his affairs in order”; compare Wilcken, U., Chrestomathie der Papyruskunde (Leipzig, 1912), no. 18.Google Scholar

40. See Mart. Scill. 13 (30 days) or Eusebius, Hist. Ecl. 7.15.3 (3 hours), or Mart. Phileae 12 (Greek) or 8 (Latin).

41. “Zur Geschichte des altesten Christentums in Rome,” Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft (ZNW) 70 (1979):97–114.Google Scholar

42. Ad Floram – Epiphanius, Adu. Haer. 33.4.4–9.

43. See Rudolph, K., Gnosis, trans. Wilson, R. McL. (Edinburgh, 1983), pp. 257–260.Google Scholar

44. Simon, , Menander, , Marcion, in Apol. 1.26;Google ScholarMarcionites, , Valentinians, , Basilidians, , Satornilians, in Dial. 35.6.Google Scholar

45. See Schmid, W., “Die Textüberlieferung der Apologie des Justin,” ZNW 40 (1941):105–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46. Irenaeus, Adu. hoer. 1.24.6.

47. See Frend, W. H. C., “The Gnostic Sects and the Roman Empire,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 5 (1954/1955):25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48. Robinson, J. M., ed., The Gnostic Library of Nag Hammadi (San Francisco, 1977), pp. 31–32.Google Scholar

49. Apol. 1.26.5; compare 7.3–4.

50. Epiphanius, Adu. Haer. 33.5.3–6.

51. Clement, , Str. 4.71–72;Google Scholar Clement's own view was much the same.

52. “Patristica,” Vigilae Christianae 3 (1949):225–229.Google Scholar

53. Schmid, W., “The Christian Reinterpretation of the Rescript of Hadrian,” Maia 7 (1955): 9.Google Scholar

54. Berger, A., Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law (Philadelphia, 1953), p. 379,Google Scholar s. v. “Calumnia.”

55. See MacMullen, R., Enemies of the Roman Order (Cambridge Mass., 1966), pp. 163–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56. Matt. comm. 14.24, pp. 344, 2–11, 19–24 Klostermann.