Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T06:04:59.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Weber Thesis Reexamined

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Winthrop S. Hudson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For more than fifty years the Weber thesis, which attributed to Calvinism a decisive influence in the development of modern capitalism, has been vigorously debated. In his celebrated essay, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Calvinism (1904), Max Weber had suggested that Calvinism contributed to the rise of capitalism in various ways—by relaxing the restraints which hitherto had largely served to impede its growth; by fostering the economic virtues of diligence, frugality, honesty, prudence, and sobriety; and, most of all, by providing a psychological fillip to the development of the “spirit” of capitalism, “the temper of single-minded concentration upon pecuniary gain.” The controversy precipitated by the publication of Weber's essay engendered considerable heat that often served to obscure the points at issue, but over the years the continuing discussion has served to remove many of the issues from the area of debate and to narrow the focus of the central issue that remains.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 57 , supplment S1 , March 1988 , pp. 56 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tawney, R. H., Religion and the Rise of Capitalism, pp. 212, 226, 316.Google Scholar

2. Ephraim, Fischoff, “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism: the History of a Controversy,” Social Research, XI (1944)Google Scholar; reprinted in Green, Robert W., Protestantism and Capitalism: The Weber Thesis and its Critics, pp. 108–09, 113–14.Google Scholar

3. Tawney, , op. cit., 226.Google Scholar

4. Ibid., 316; Robertson, H. M., Aspects of the Rise of Economic Individualism, pp. 52–56Google Scholar; Amintore, Fanfani, Catholicism, Protestantism, and Capitalism, pp. 160–82.Google Scholar

5. Green, R. W., op. cit., 30–34Google Scholar; Robertson, , op. cit., 4–7Google Scholar; Fanfani, , op. cit., 196, 200–04.Google Scholar

6. Fanfani, , op. cit., 186–187.Google Scholar

7. Max, Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, p. 27.Google Scholar

8. Ibid., 2.

9. Ibid., 3, 160–63, 172.

10. Green, , op. cit., 107, 109, 112, 113.Google Scholar

11. A not untypical instance of manipulation is the way in which he handles Cromwell's request for legislation to reform economic abuses. Cromwell, after the battle of Dunbar, had written to the Long Parliament: “Be pleased to reform the abuses of all professions: and if there be any one that makes many poor to make a few rich, that suits not a Commonwealth.” Weber then adds the comment: “Nevertheless, we will find Cromwell following a quite specifically capitalistic line of thought,” documenting this assertion by quoting in a footnote Cromwell's words of reproach to the Irish rebels—a reproach which was actually very conventional and might have been spoken by any ruler to rebellious subjects. By this means Cromwell's forthright request for legislation to curb an unbridled lust for gain is brushed aside. Weber, , op. cit., 82, 213.Google Scholar

12. Ibid., 7, 10–11.

13. Green, , op. cit., 111.Google Scholar See also Fanfani, , op. cit., 160–82.Google Scholar

14. Weber, , op. cit., 155.Google Scholar

15. Tawney, , op. cit., 213, 226, 317.Google Scholar

16. Ernst, Troeltsch, The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches, II, 649.Google Scholar

17. Tawney, , op. cit., 317.Google Scholar

18. Ibid., 226, 227.

19. Ibid., 240. “The first person to emphasize the way in which the idea of a ‘calling’ was used as an argument for the economic virtues was Weber, to whose conclusions I am largely indebted.” Ibid., 321.

20. Ibid., 230.

21. Ibid., 240. See Troeltsch (op. cit., 645), who also traces “the present-day bourgeois way of life” to the Calvinist doctrine of the calling with its emphasis upon profit and gain as a sign of God's blessing.

22. Robertson, , op. cit., 1–7.Google Scholar

23. Fanfani, , op. cit., 204.Google Scholar

24. Ibid., 192.

25. Baxter's views have been summarized in Hudson, W. S., “Puritanism and the Spirit of Capitalism,” Church History, XVIII (1949), 8–14.Google Scholar

26. Fanfani, , op. cit., 153–54.Google Scholar

27. Weber, , op. cit., 60.Google Scholar

28. Troeltsch, , op. cit., 645.Google Scholar

29. Tawney, , op. cit., 226.Google Scholar

30. Ibid., 225.

31. Ibid., 103.

32. Fanfani, , op. cit., 202.Google Scholar

33. Ibid., 178–79.

34. Ibid., 197–99.

35. Ibid., 210.

36. Tawney, , op. cit., 237–38.Google Scholar

37. Robertson, , op. cit., 22, 27.Google Scholar

38. Tawney, , op. cit., 238.Google Scholar

39. Robertson, , op. cit., 210–11.Google Scholar

40. Fanfani, , op. cit., 187–88.Google Scholar